RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


JVoV -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (1/22/2025 10:18:25 AM)

Facts don't care about your feelings bro.

Cry harder snowflake.




BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (1/22/2025 2:32:44 PM)


VIDEO - nearly 7 minutes of network news videos from around the country of females of different ages that were kidnapped, beaten, raped and killed by men here illegally

But I'm sure they wouldn't vote for the cult that coddles them, technically they are permitted to do do that




BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (1/22/2025 3:36:43 PM)


*not permitted to do that.




JVoV -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (1/22/2025 5:09:59 PM)

That's probably why Trump won so much in court on 2020, huh?

Cry harder, snowflake.




BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (3/26/2025 4:23:20 AM)


Fast reply -

President Trump is asking Congress for legislation that finally deliver secure elections. What he's calling for:

- Proof of citizenship
- Voter ID
- One Day Voting
- Paper Ballots

quote:

"You are about to see the most significant fight yet out of the Democrats, and it will be over the voter ID issues. They know if this passes, they will never win another election. They are about to go nuclear on it." - @Sadie_NC

https://x.com/Sadie_NC/status/1904752124400959589




JVoV -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (3/26/2025 1:27:25 PM)

Two months later huh? And what I said is still accuratefor every story about a Dem commiting voter fraud, there's
at least 100 about GOP cultists doing it.




BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/20/2025 6:07:45 AM)


FAST REPLY -

VIDEO - Nancy Mace destroys the left's voter ID narrative

DESTROYS it: https://x.com/RickyDoggin/status/1913796937008247153




JVoV -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/20/2025 8:46:59 AM)

You necros a thread just to say 'nu uh'? Lame.

Why don't we talk about how the SAVE Act would disenfranchise millions of legal citizens?

Actually, the biggest target to or that would be white women,l the majority of which voted for Trump anyway. So I'm on the fence on that one.




BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/20/2025 9:32:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

You necros a thread just to say 'nu uh'? Lame.

Why don't we talk about how the SAVE Act would disenfranchise millions of legal citizens?

Actually, the biggest target to or that would be white women,l the majority of which voted for Trump anyway. So I'm on the fence on that one.


Your masters have you mindwashed into believing, REALLY believing, that women are far too stupid to obtain the kind of IDs necessary to vote. [sm=brush.gif]

And you lecture ME about accurately describing bimbos, as bimbos... [sm=biggrin.gif]

So because as you say, women are far too stupid to obtain proper IDs, we have to let the tens of millions of illegal aliens who they actively brought in, vote in our elections to make your oligarch masters all-powerful, uberwealthy, and untouchable elitists forever

At least your masters have moved on from their racist preaching that blacks cannot obtain proper IDs because "they are inferior" to you, their white liberal savior

YouTube Video: Ami Horowitz - How white liberals really view black voters:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JGmKHrWKMQ

Substitute "women" and it's the same argument

80% of blacks support voter ID laws btw

https://x.com/SenatorTimScott/status/1481355398733045763




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/25/2025 2:53:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

After Orange County received received a bomb threat and before the workers were removed from the ballot counting facility an election worker in Orange County, California, counted the same large stack of ballots three times on the evening of November 8th.

Republicans lost a House seat in Orange County a month after the election.


Video - https://x.com/BehizyTweets/status/1880057920639103037




You are just sooooooooo fucking gullible. You lap this shit up like catnip. Some grifter on Rumble posts this nonsense, and then someone echoes it on X.
And here it is echoed by you.


For the millionth time for ALL of the idiotic right wing sheep that are out there...

Ballots have BAR CODES, which make them UNIQUE. I could scan the same ballot 1000 times. The first time, it would be counted. The other 999 times, it would be rejected.

The video has been edited, but she scanned the batch the first time and there were some inconsistencies in the data (digital from the barcode VS the data on file in the registry) on a few of the ballots. She manually verified those ballots in the system and marked them as such. She then re-scanned the batch (as per her process). There were a few more to verify. She verified and re-scanned again.

AS IS HER PROCESS.
https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/video-unsuccessful-ballot-scans-misrepresented-evidence-fraud-2025-01-29/




BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/26/2025 8:27:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

You are just sooooooooo fucking gullible. You lap this shit up like catnip. Some grifter on Rumble posts this nonsense, and then someone echoes it on X.
And here it is echoed by you.


For the millionth time for ALL of the idiotic right wing sheep that are out there...

Ballots have BAR CODES, which make them UNIQUE. I could scan the same ballot 1000 times. The first time, it would be counted. The other 999 times, it would be rejected.

The video has been edited, but she scanned the batch the first time and there were some inconsistencies in the data (digital from the barcode VS the data on file in the registry) on a few of the ballots. She manually verified those ballots in the system and marked them as such. She then re-scanned the batch (as per her process). There were a few more to verify. She verified and re-scanned again.

AS IS HER PROCESS.
https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/video-unsuccessful-ballot-scans-misrepresented-evidence-fraud-2025-01-29/



Even if you believe that you have a valid point, your training forces you to to rely on ad hominem fallacies to make that point really stick. Is that due to an inferiority complex on your part? Or something else.

Because it isn't a good look.




wickedsdesires -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/26/2025 12:53:20 PM)

Fuck, I have lost track! What are we all talking about now?

Voter ID is brand spanking new to the UK. Hopefully I gave you all the basics. Voter fraud in Scotland, and that shithole England, and what ever the fuck America is, is non existent.

None of UK voter ID requirement's make any sense. What applies to one age group doesn't apply to another therefore it makes fuck all sense, and even I make sense on occasions. It is a form of voter suppression. Best I can tell both UK right and left parties are on board with it. We don't need it nor does America.

I will keep it simple for you all. Here is one absurdity from many, that is the UK. If you postal vote in the UK you do not need photo ID or any ID!

I heard Panda's, actually fucking Chinese Panda's, were sniffing out all the American fake delicious paper imported bamboo ballots in the second last America election. Did they find any? And how much did that cost, and all election challenges, and who the fuck paid for all of that?

Gerrymandering I dont know enough but I think that is a State level thing or is it? I am aware the right led states removed millions of voters from the Presidential ballot. The absurdity here is call it 4 people they challenged, and got removed, 40,000 people.


Almost every state has laws concerning voter challenges to ensure elections remain fair and guarantee that only eligible voters cast ballots.



https://www.brennancenter.org/series/limits-voter-eligibility-challenges Most states allow residents to challenge the eligibility of other voters, either before or during an election. Many of these laws originated or were expanded during Reconstruction as a tool for suppressing Black voters. Today, technological advances have made it easy to pull massive amounts of (often unreliable) data from the internet and automatically fill out online voter challenge forms with just a few clicks. Many election deniers, riled up by disinformation about the risk of voter fraud, are doing just that on a mass scale.



Our democracy is strongest when every American has the opportunity to participate. Yet coordinated efforts by partisan actors to conduct “mass voter challenges” threaten Americans’ freedom to vote across the country and stand to overwhelm and overburden election officials during an already busy time.

Mass challenges are exactly what they sound like — attempts by individuals to question or challenge someone’s eligibility to vote. Currently, 46 states have laws on the books that allow individuals to challenge a registered voter’s qualifications under certain circumstances.

Voter challenge laws have long been used in this country to target recently naturalized citizens, voters of color, student voters, and voters with disabilities. Many states first enacted their voter challenge laws following Reconstruction to block newly enfranchised Black voters from accessing the polls.

Bad actors have used some states’ relatively lenient challenge laws to challenge the eligibility of hundreds, and even sometimes thousands, of voters at once.
https://campaignlegal.org/update/protecting-americans-mass-voter-challenges

Unraveling the Rise of Mass Voter Challenges https://protectdemocracy.org/work/voter-challenges/

Who are these people? Who do they work for? Who pays them? Project 2025 and Russia!




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/26/2025 1:20:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

You are just sooooooooo fucking gullible. You lap this shit up like catnip. Some grifter on Rumble posts this nonsense, and then someone echoes it on X.
And here it is echoed by you.


For the millionth time for ALL of the idiotic right wing sheep that are out there...

Ballots have BAR CODES, which make them UNIQUE. I could scan the same ballot 1000 times. The first time, it would be counted. The other 999 times, it would be rejected.

The video has been edited, but she scanned the batch the first time and there were some inconsistencies in the data (digital from the barcode VS the data on file in the registry) on a few of the ballots. She manually verified those ballots in the system and marked them as such. She then re-scanned the batch (as per her process). There were a few more to verify. She verified and re-scanned again.

AS IS HER PROCESS.
https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/video-unsuccessful-ballot-scans-misrepresented-evidence-fraud-2025-01-29/



Even if you believe that you have a valid point, your training forces you to to rely on ad hominem fallacies to make that point really stick. Is that due to an inferiority complex on your part? Or something else.

Because it isn't a good look.


My post - Facts... Solid logic and premise
To wit:

1. The conclusion reached by the creator of the video is clearly a lie and a grift as the facts bear out
2. The Facts in item #1 are that Ballots have unique barcodes to only allow them to be scanned once. Therefore they could not count as three votes
3. The right wing echo chamber works quickly: Rumble-->X-->This forum
4. You do no research and have no broad knowledge of any topic. You simply find a story that fits your narrative and you go with it. That is why you are so brainwashed with social media. You LOVE X, because it does all the work for you. It tells you exactly what to think, and fills your feed with it.
5. You also are now using X to source your FAST REPLIES. You just lap up the next fake news article in your feed and paste it in the forum. No thinking to be done!


On the other hand,
Your post in it's entirety is one big ad hominem fallacy.
You can't argue any of the facts in my post, so you project your reliance on ad hominem attacks on me.





BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/27/2025 7:06:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


You don't know what an ad hominem fallacy is, it is tiresome to try to teach you such basic things, and I do not rely on them almost exclusively as you and yours do.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/27/2025 12:24:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


You don't know what an ad hominem fallacy is, it is tiresome to try to teach you such basic things, and I do not rely on them almost exclusively as you and yours do.


I know precisely what an ad hominem fallacy is. To put it simply, it is an irrelevant attack on a person making a point, rather than the actual points he/she has made. You do it in almost 100% of your posts.

Every one of your threads. Every post is an attack. Whenever anyone challenges your pasted nonsense from X, you irrelevantly attack them. You almost never research the actual facts, so you have no ability to debate. That is basically your only debating tactic. I don't think in the history of this forum there has ever been a contributor who relies more heavily on ad hominem fallacies than you.

Pretty soon all of the AI engines will reference "BoscoX" when anyone searches for ad hominem fallacies.




BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (4/27/2025 2:19:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Pretty soon all of the AI engines will reference "BoscoX" when anyone searches for ad hominem fallacies.



You and your constant ad hominem fallacies are tiresome and petty.





BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (5/2/2025 9:56:14 PM)


Democrats are losing a LOT of House seats because of this, and they're very upset [:@]

ICE Nabs Rapists, Predators, Gang Members In Deportation Blitz

https://dailycaller.com/2025/05/02/ice-arrests-migrants-donald-trump-border-ero-department-homeland-security/




JVoV -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (5/3/2025 1:21:03 AM)

I have no idea why Democrats would lose seats because of people that can't and don't vote in our elections anyway. The House seats are based on the census, which isn't due to be taken again until 2030 I think.




BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (5/3/2025 6:45:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

I have no idea why Democrats would lose seats because of people that can't and don't vote in our elections anyway. The House seats are based on the census, which isn't due to be taken again until 2030 I think.


You answered your own question. However, it's odd that you really seem to believe that five years from now never comes

The census is the one reason Democrats declared that their blue shit holes are "sanctuaries." "Democrats" <spit> are USING the invasion to steal representation from American citizens for their own personal wealth and power

Human trafficking cartels - vastly empowered and enriched. Terrorists, enemy agents from Russia and China, fentanyl, and everything else poured in over the Biden wide-open border, because your cult only cares about wealth and power for its Dearest Leaders.

We have suffered the biggest invasion in the history of the United States, vast numbers of people of all ages raped along the way, disappeared, because they were lured by your cult with promises of "free" luxury hotels and everything else

quote:

It’s an attack on democracy and a constitutional crisis.

It is the DUTY of the President to decide how to repel such an incursion on our sovereignty, not a random district court judge.

Scott Jennings @ScottJenningsKY

https://x.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1918374177759023281





BoscoX -> RE: There is ONE reason to ban voter ID requirements (5/3/2025 6:47:59 AM)


God and everyone else knows beyond a doubt that if Democrats had the power, every invader would be given the vote immediately

Hundreds of votes each, actually, just like California, where voter ID has been banned by state law




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625