JVoV
Posts: 3600
Joined: 3/9/2015 Status: offline
|
Our Constitution is written so that the judicial branch can interpret the laws written by the legislative branch and administered by the executive branch. You should read it sometime. "Activist judges" is a dum term. It makes it sound like they're making laws up without any actual case before them that they have to decide. Every legal decision starts by an aggrieved party filing suit. The judicial branch of the federal government is the least democratic branch of all. Voters have absolutely no direct decision on any federal judges. Each one is appointed by the president, which is elected, then confirmed by the Senate, which is also elected. So the judicial branch is our democratic Republic in action, just as the founding fathers wrote out and agreed to. Congress may not have allocated find for specific projects. That would be a problem with Congress. Laws should be passed to prevent any agency from funding organizations and countries on a list of terrorists. Without such laws, the agencies themselves can be making terrible decisions with our money, going against our own best interests or wishes, but it would be perfectly legal. Congress has an Oversight Committee for such a thing and should use it accordingly. Congress should not be giving a rubber stamps to any agency at all, but doing it's due diligence on the budget. Of course, that's nearly impossible, with each member of Congress championing their own pet projects and trying to get funds for their district (which is kinda what they're elected to do). A prime example would be members or Congress voting against the Build Back Better law but then scrambling to get funding from it in their district. I did not say that every project from every agency was allocated specific funds by Congress in the budget, so I'm not sure why you're arguing that at all. I haven't read the actual budget to know, in just glad there is one. Well, not a budget precisely, but whatever it is. Personally, I'm of the opinion that all members of Congress should be arrested for not making a real damn budget. Our government should never be shut down for any reason. That just shouldn't be allowed. I wasn't in favor of Trump & CO on the campaign trail and I'm not now. It's not a matter of whether or not I agree with the action as much as whether or not the action is legal under our Constitution. That document enumerates precisely what authority each branch of government has, with everything not specifically mentioned left to the States or to the people, as the 10th Amendment says. I don't think that DIGE should exist. I don't think it should have to. Trump is currently giving himself a line-itrm veto, which probably isn't legal.l anyways, but the timing of it is just dumb, considering a new budget resolution needs to be signed into law for May, otherwise the government shuts down again. Trump also wants to suspend the debt ceiling. That's a good indication that he plans to once again create larger deficits. The Congressional Oversight Committee should have at least one member dedicated to looking over the budget of each agency, monitoring it so that a DIGE isn't necessary. Meaning Congress should actually do their fucking jobs.
|