quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
It's routine to relocate prisoners, and there can be hundreds of good non-conspiracy-theory reasons

No. It sure as hell is not routine to relocate prisoners. It rarely happens, unless it is a medical necessity.
Sexual offenders of this magnitude are NEVER put in "CAMPS". NEVER

The are not hundreds of good non-conspiracy-theory reasons. There is not even one.

A statement will be released by the AG saying Maxwell stated that the President had no involvement. (In return for this deal)

As Rachael Maddow says...

"Watch this space!"


ROFL LMFAO

Sure enough. They are editing video of the Blanche interview with Ghislane Maxwell, and will release the highly edited video that removes our president's involvement.

I said "WATCH THIS SPACE"

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

As Rachael Maddow says...

"Watch this space!"

quote:

Democrats Humiliate Themselves AGAIN With Another Epstein Drop

House Oversight Democrats embarrassed themselves again on Wednesday with yet another stunt masquerading as transparency. They released what they hyped as never-before-seen photos and videos from Jeffrey Epstein's private island.

Dems postured as noble seekers of justice in their post on X:

quote:

Oversight Dems
@OversightDems
🚨 BREAKING: Oversight Dems have received never-before-seen photos and videos of Jeffrey Epstein's private island that are a harrowing look behind Epstein’s closed doors.

See for yourself. We won’t stop fighting until we end this cover-up and deliver justice for the survivors.

https://x.com/OversightDems/status/1996254530447569384?s=20

“These new images are a disturbing look into the world of Jeffrey Epstein and his island. We are releasing these photos and videos to ensure public transparency in our investigation and to help piece together the full picture of Epstein’s horrific crimes. We won’t stop fighting until we deliver justice for the survivors,” Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said in a statement. “It’s time for President Trump to release all the files, now.”

There was just one problem: The images weren't new at all.

The post turned out to be the latest humiliation of Democrats in their attempts to anoint themselves as the party of transparency regarding the Epstein files. In fact, investigative journalist James O'Keefe and his O'Keefe Media Group had already made those same images public roughly seven months earlier.

quote:

James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII
The @OversightDems
are now redacting Epstein photos @OKeefeMedia
released in May.

Phone book:
“Karyna”
“Anna cell”
“Steph cell”
“STC office”

Chalkboard:
“Dank Brain”
Other redactions can hardly be made out in the uncensored photos.

How can they claim to be “fighting the coverup” when they’re redacting photos we already been released!?!?

https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1996338584413172007?s=20

O’Keefe said his organization would be requesting a retraction and pointed out that even TIME magazine had credited O'Keefe Media Group for previously releasing some of the very images Democrats were now labeling as never-before-seen.TIME wasn’t alone, either. ABC News also acknowledged “some of the material appeared similar to material previously published by Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe several months ago."

ICYMI: Bombshell Report Reveals Shocking New Motive for DC National Guard Shooter

Even more ironic is that Democrats slapped unexplained redactions all over these previously released images. O'Keefe pointed out that his organization had released the same photos in May without any redactions, yet Democrats were "now redacting Epstein photos" for reasons they didn't bother to explain.

A spokesperson for House Oversight Republicans dismissed the entire release as "another cherry-picked publicity stunt," noting it was odd that Democrats were "once again releasing selective information, as they have done before."

This isn't the first time Oversight Democrats have played fast and loose with Epstein documents to score cheap political points. They previously attempted to hide the name of a victim in redacted email dumps because that victim, Virginia Giuffre, had stated under oath that President Trump never acted inappropriately with her and that she never saw him with Epstein at any of his homes. Democrats also claimed Trump spent Thanksgiving in 2017 with Epstein and were forced to delete their post when it was easily disproved.

quote:

ORIGINAL: wickedsdesires

Why were those photos redacted?

quote:

Bill Clinton is in Hot Water After Epstein Dump Reveals Compromising Pictures [WATCH]

https://www.lifezette.com/2025/12/bill-clinton-is-in-hot-water-after-epstein-dump-reveals-compromising-pictures-watch/

quote:

Sister of Epstein victim reported him in 1996, but FBI failed to investigate, files reveal

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/sister-of-epstein-victim-reported-him-in-1996-but-fbi-failed-to-investigate-files-reveal/ar-AA1SLOGk?ocid=winp2fptaskbar&cvid=69473efb1b944190aeef910024f3cd5f&ei=20

quote:

ORIGINAL: wickedsdesires

What say you Boscox?

President Donald Trump flew on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's private jet 'many more times than previously has been reported,' according to an email from a New York prosecutor that forms part of a new batch of documents about Epstein released Tuesday by the U.S. Justice Department.

Trump "didn't know the man". I can remember a few taxis myself but not them all, but I reckon how many times I have been in aeroplane and private jets 100%.

If I was in a jet with Epstein I reckon I could remember, let alone with the school children. Granted, any more than 100 I will forget some of their names.

Got that ones age or did you double it and claim she looked about 20? If they do not want to show her, name picture can they show passport year born?



"On one flight in 1993, he and Epstein are the only two listed passengers; on another, the only three passengers are Epstein, Trump, and then-20-year-old..." - the rest of the sentence has been redacted.

It continues: "On two other flights, two of the passengers, respectively, were women who would be possible witnesses in a Maxwell case."



The email says Trump flew on Epstein's jet "including during the period we would expect to charge in a Maxwell case".

If you were in a jet with child flying to pedo island would you remember? If not, did they chuck the child out at 16000 feet? And a couple of hundred more. But even then if you visited my cat ridden hovel and I had 1000s school children would you not be alarmed, after hurled up, klaxons sound and then some?