wickedsdesires
Posts: 742
Joined: 10/25/2008 Status: offline
|
Charles6682, as it would I. Boscox, has already brought that one up on here. He tends to do click bait headlines where even the text of his click bait artciles rarely have even an iota of truth and reality. Having looked into myself https://www.collarchat.com/m_5107450/tm.htm fuller explanation which included According to its statement, West Yorkshire Police did not investigate Richelieu-Booth because the photo showed him holding a gun but rather because a complainant interpreted his online posts as a threat to their safety. Gun ownership is legal in the U.K. only with a police-issued license. However, I can tell you this happened this week. Barton, 43, was handed a six-month prison sentence, suspended for 18 months, at Liverpool Crown Court on Monday following his convictions for sending grossly offensive electronic communications with intent to cause distress or anxiety. At the trial, Jurors were told that in June 2024, Barton agreed to pay Mr Vine £75,000 in damages for defamation and harassment, together with his legal costs, after both parties settled in a civil action. In a further settlement between both parties, Barton paid Mr Vine £35,000 damages and legal costs over similar matters. The court heard Barton also apologised to the broadcaster in a post on his X account in June 2024, in which he said he had made a "very serious allegation" on social media in which he accused Mr Vine of having a sexual interest in children, which he said was "untrue". A jury found Barton, originally of Huyton, Merseyside, but now of now of Widnes, Cheshire, guilty on six of 12 counts between January and March 2024, and not guilty on six counts in November. The trial heard he had "crossed the line between free speech and a crime" with six posts. "He's got three million followers and he thinks he's got a licence to tell filthy lies about people and he hasn't," Mr Vine said. "I took a libel case against him, which cost him, by his account, £600,000 so at that point I felt I got satisfaction. The criminal case was an add-on. "Now he's got a suspended sentence so he should have learned his lesson but I don't think he will have." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce3zyv055vjo I havent read all the details on that not sure what to think myself. I see the defamation part. As a general rule in the UK you cannot incite hate, violence or terror. Ironic given that Elon Musk called UK cave rescuer a pedo on X and when that came to court Elon Musk wins defamation case over 'pedo guy' tweet about caver https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-50695593 Elon Musk did not defame a British caver who helped in last year's rescue of trapped Thai schoolboys by calling him a "pedo guy", a US jury has found. Vernon Unsworth sought $190m (£145m) in damages from the Tesla founder, arguing that the tweet damaged his reputation. A public row broke out between the two men over the rescue of 12 boys trapped in a Thai cave in June 2018. Mr Musk told the court this week the phrase "pedo guy" was common in South Africa, where he grew up. Speaking to reporters outside the courtroom after the jury reached its decision, Mr Musk said: "My faith in humanity is restored." Mr Unsworth's lawyer Lin Wood said their side would leave the court "with our heads held high" but that the decision was "not a good verdict for society". "This verdict sends a signal, and one signal only - that you can make any accusation you want to, as vile as it may be and as untrue as it may be, and somebody can get away with it," he said. The case had been closely watched as it was seen as testing the legal threshold in the US for defamatory material on social media. Appearing dejected, Mr Unsworth himself added: "I respect the jury's decision. I'd just like to say my legal team have been absolutely awesome. I came here for a verdict, unfortunately it's not gone the way I expected but I respect the jury's decision and thank them for that." Jurors took less than an hour to return their unanimous verdict, following a four-day trial at a federal court in Los Angeles. Dont ask me why this trial was not in the UK. Sure as hell looked defamation to me UK, and even USA. Mr Musk, who now has nearly 30 million followers, responded with a series of tweets about Mr Unsworth - including the one calling him "pedo guy". It was later deleted. One of the smartest moves by Elon Musk's defence was in introducing the concept of "JDart", an acronym to describe their client's conduct on Twitter in relation to the infamous "pedo guy" tweet. A JDart, lawyer Alex Spiro explained, meant: a Joke that was badly received, therefore Deleted, with an Apology and then Responsive Tweets to move on from the matter. JDart. More details in all my links, boscox never reads them. But, don't forget this is America and land of free Speech Trump and his arse lickers British Reporter DISMANTLES Trump Bootlicker With ONE Simple Question! If there's any country right now facing real 7:18 attacks on free speech, it's the United 7:20 States, not the UK. The journalist in 7:23 the clip laid it all out clearly. Trump 7:25 targeting critics and lawyers, cutting 7:27 university funding over campus speech, 7:29 blocking journalists from the White 7:30 House, banning words like gender and 7:32 LGBT and federal communication, 7:34 punishing public critics, pressuring 7:36 institutions, and cracking down on 7:37 peaceful protests. These are textbook 7:40 signs of a government fighting against 7:41 free expression. So, when John Hulps was 7:43 asked a simple question, what exactly 7:45 did JD Vance do? She had nothing. She 7:48 couldn't answer because she didn't know. 7:50 She just crumbled the same way she did 7:52 the first time I covered her. And this 7:53 is who the right keeps putting forward 7:55 to defend Trump. It's honestly 7:56 embarrassing. Do you feel America has free speech? Amazing none of you bring this up and seem concenrened with other countries. America isnt far of China and Russian State these days.
< Message edited by wickedsdesires -- 12/11/2025 6:07:01 AM >
|