marieToo
Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006 From: Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WildnWicked Ever had sex with someone for any other reason than expression of love, physical gratification or reproduction? No. Ive had sex when I didnt feel like it, but I would indeed consider it an "expression of love", in the sense that we do things all the time for someone we may love, that we may not neccesarily feel like doing. This happens alot in marriages; the examples spread out far and wide in such a relationship, not just sexually. quote:
Meaning, have you ever used sex within a relationship to get what you wanted? No. quote:
Did you ever in your life use sex to pacify a partner or put them in a better mood to get what you wanted? (I want to go out and if I have sex with him it will put him in a better mood and there won't be a fight). Yes, if I gave my ex husband sex when he wanted it and yes he would be in a better mood. The same way we're all in a better mood when we get what we want. Though I cant say I ever did this so that he would take me out without an argument. Im sure he went shopping with me many times when he didnt feel like it We do and tolerate things for loved ones all the time in relationships. I wouldnt call this prostitution. quote:
Ever done anything sexual to get any kind of payoff (emotional, mental, financial -directly or indirectly, etc). No. quote:
I think if most women really looked at their past they can see where at some time in their life they have had sex in exchange for something. Maybe it wasn't a spoken agreement, but more like a conscious or subconscious manipulation of a situation. I think actually you make a well-articulated point stating that there are a myriad of 'reasons' that we may have sex with someone other than sheer desire. I personally, do not see this as prostitution. quote:
Most men have paid through the nose for sex. Sex workers at least have a flat fee. Dates can drain your wallet dry on a CHANCE of getting laid! Taking your lover or potential lover on a dinner date is not the same as paying for sex, or gambling for the possibility of it. Especially today, when most women can simply buy their own dinner if they wanted to. I cant speak for other women out there, but dinner or lack thereof, is not a determining factor of whether or not I consider being sexually intimate with someone. To suggest that (and Im not saying thats what you did) would be an insult to women in general and to men in general. I can name at least 5 men off the top of my head that would gladly have my dinner company and pick up the tab, knowing that our night isnt going to end in sex. quote:
How many diamonds does a husband have to buy before the wife finally puts out?How many dinners does he have to go to at his in-laws before he gets a "thank you" blowjob? How many times has the man known the wife/gf wants to go out and has set up the relationship to where she knows to bang him and he won't give her shit about going out? All of the above, I would consider dysfunctional on some level, for different reasons. But I still cant get with this being called prostituion. quote:
Sex is exchanged for more than just money. It is a payoff either way you look at it. If I were a prostitute, I'd probably agree with this. But Im not, so I dont. I take no position on pro domming negative or positive. Nor do I take a position on whether or not prostituion is wrong. I do however believe that if one is a prostitute one should simply own it, rather than justify it. marie.
|