thetammyjo
Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kaledorus I have noticed that during the Reagan years and the G HW Bush term, that TV was much racier in showing skin and PBS was replete with full frontal nudity and even the "F" word, then Clinton came in and things, especially on PBS, got cleaned up. I just can't figure that out but so it is. Why can't our TV be more like Brazil or Europe's? Consider the types of Europeans who came to the "New World" -- not the most open minded and sexually free people in my opinion. Brazil drew from a different group of Europeans as well. Like I said, neither Democrats or Republican like porn but cleaning up their own televions programs and promoting shows that might be argueable less racy is quite different than using the legal system to track down and prosecute businesses and individuals. I also don't think that the amount of sex shown is a solid measurement of how liberal or free, conservative or limited, a country or government is. I think the type of sex, how it is shown and discussed, attitudes toward sex, laws and their enforcement, and type of sexual education may be a better measurement.
_____________________________
Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains, TammyJo Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/
|