Leonidas
Posts: 2078
Joined: 2/16/2004 Status: offline
|
Hello willing2serve, Dominance (power) isn't an interpersonal dynamic, it's a quality possessed by some people. Thorn's definition: "power is a real or perceived ability to affect a persons existence" is right on. Our leaders have power, but so do our enemies. Our perception of their power alters our behavior profoundly. We ally ourselves with, or submit to (they aren't the same thing) our leaders because of our perception of their power. We build walls and other defenses to keep our enemies at bay because of our perception of theirs. While folks in this lifestyle like to think that dominance and submission is a personal kink, it really isn't. It's a fundamental organizing principal of human existance. People give their allegence to, or submit to (they aren't the same thing) people that they percieve to be more powerful (dominant) than they are. They do that because it is their perception that their personal fortunes, or some greater good to which they are committed, will be furthered by doing so. This, of course, isn't the same thing as "power play" where two people set up a scenario in which one plays at submitting to the power of the other for mutual sexual gratification, but where no real power differential exists outside that play scenario. Control isn't really the same thing, as american business is learning slowly. You can give a manager control, but you can't really give him or her power by fiat. He or she is either possessed of dominance, or they are not. A high profile example of this from recent news is Carly Fiorino's sudden firing at HP. She had great vision, and she was and could be ruthless in business, but in the final analysis, she did not get those over whom she had been given control to rally behind her. She had control, but not sufficient power to do that very difficult job.
< Message edited by Leonidas -- 2/16/2005 3:58:44 PM >
_____________________________
Take care of yourself Leonidas
|