Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/28/2006 10:15:49 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Also, do you have an official name to the project?  The closest I could find to "WHOPR" was the fictional WOPR (War Operation Plan Response) computer system in the movie WarGames.

FirmKY


I used to have a computer user account on a computer named "WHOPER" in Cheyenne Mountain, the home of NORAD.

But apparently you are more in tune with our missile defense system than I am.

Go you.

Sinergy.

p.s. as a side note, I generally refer to NORAD as a hamster cage on springs.  It is this large tunnel burrowed into Cheyenne Mountain built out of iron and bouyed up on 4 foot springs.  I was in there one night doing stuff with things and they decided to test the blast doors.  I was on my way home, and they could not get the doors open and were using a jackhammer to get the pins to open up from the inside.

My question to the security guy of "Is there any other way out of here?" was met with a rather baleful stare, as if he was figuring out the dimensions of my coffin.

I didnt really care, I had been in that stupid place for 32 hours and I wanted to go to sleep.  If you are interested, I am not sure the cafeteria in that silly place rates a star in the Michelin guide.

Sinerg

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 521
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/28/2006 10:25:35 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well imo nations with nukes pointed at us are a very real cause for concern.  The soviets were expanding and of course we couldnt have to much of that. 



One of the main criticisms of the US military during Desert Storm was our inability to track and take down SCUD missiles fired at Isreal.

Due to the SALT treaties which Carter initiated, neither side could develop any sort of missile defense system.  Within reason, of course.

Our missile warning system deals with ballistic missiles, which is a missile which takes off from the surface of the planet, gets semi-orbital, and then drops out like a bomb from outer space.  The only really effective way to even track a ballistic missile is to figure out what type of ballistic missile it is during it's launch phase, and then figure out where it is capable of landing.

SCUDs are not a ballistic missile.  Our entire missile defense system was useless during the gulf war.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 522
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/28/2006 10:26:51 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well imo nations with nukes pointed at us are a very real cause for concern.  The soviets were expanding and of course we couldnt have to much of that. 



No argument here.

For the first 3.5 years of the contract there was a real cause for concern.

Unless, of course, one considered the whole concept of mutually assurred destruction, Detente, etc., where people sat down in a room and realized that the only way to win nuclear war was not to play.

Then the Soviet Union went bankrupt (largely because they spent all their money on their military) and we no longer had a mass raid threat.

So the last 3.5 years were simply, in my opinion, a blithering idiots determination to throw good money after bad.

But, being a good employee, I sat at my terminal and did performance analyses.

Just me, etc.

Sinergy


Budget justification LOL


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 523
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/28/2006 10:31:15 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

well imo nations with nukes pointed at us are a very real cause for concern.  The soviets were expanding and of course we couldnt have to much of that. 



One of the main criticisms of the US military during Desert Storm was our inability to track and take down SCUD missiles fired at Isreal.

Due to the SALT treaties which Carter initiated, neither side could develop any sort of missile defense system.  Within reason, of course.

Our missile warning system deals with ballistic missiles, which is a missile which takes off from the surface of the planet, gets semi-orbital, and then drops out like a bomb from outer space.  The only really effective way to even track a ballistic missile is to figure out what type of ballistic missile it is during it's launch phase, and then figure out where it is capable of landing.

SCUDs are not a ballistic missile.  Our entire missile defense system was useless during the gulf war.

Sinergy


yeh but under the circumstances they really did pretty good all thi8ngs considered..  didnt they get like over 50% what they shot at or is my data wrong?


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 524
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/28/2006 10:33:14 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Budget justification LOL



Dude, I had kids and a wife who needed to eat.

I realize that there is a particular level of hell reserved  for people like me, who
sacrifice their principles and reasoning skills for the Almighty Dollar.

But about 4 years ago I came to my senses, and at this point in my life I would rather paint my brains on the wall with a 9mm than work for The Man.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 525
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/28/2006 10:36:16 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Budget justification LOL



Dude, I had kids and a wife who needed to eat.

I realize that there is a particular level of hell reserved  for people like me, who
sacrifice their principles and reasoning skills for the Almighty Dollar.

But about 4 years ago I came to my senses, and at this point in my life I would rather paint my brains on the wall with a 9mm than work for The Man.

Sinergy


Not you man!  The project managers/budget dierctors etc!  LOL


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 526
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/28/2006 10:45:57 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

yeh but under the circumstances they really did pretty good all thi8ngs considered..  didnt they get like over 50% what they shot at or is my data wrong?



Apples and oranges.

Patriot missiles are designed to detect non-ballistic missiiles and shoot them down. 

A SCUD is not a ballistic missile.

Sure, those did great, but the 7 billion dollar missile defense system was as useful as tits on a snake.

Just me, etc.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 527
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/28/2006 10:46:20 PM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

....i've picked out these three questions because i believe here is where we most disagree. The first question speaks to the manipulation of data. By suggesting that both sides are equally distorting the data i believe you make an error. As you have already agreed with, there is a human impact on global climate. One side denies this, the other sides position is based on this as a premise. Given a right/wrong answer only one side can be manipulating the data, in this case the nay-sayers.

Amongst those who disagree about global warming I include not only those who don’t believe that the Earth is getting warmer but those who believe it but dispute its’ causes and effects. As for manipulation of the data I don’t necessarily mean direct falsification of the data (which any scientist worth his salt would consider unethical) although I am sure that does happen. Rather, I include how that data is presented to the general public. Which facts are emphasized and which ones go unmentioned. This isn’t always a conscious decision but is often the result of built in bias. We see what we want to see. Then there is good old fashioned human nature. I don’t want to sound insulting but I think it is naive to believe that one side of the debate (or any debate for that matter) is pure and good, and the other side is evil (or stupid).

quote:

Next you go on to talk about 'fear of global warming' and how it is used to further agendas. Clearly if one side of an argument denies its existence, then it can't use fear of something it doesnt admit to existing to further its agenda. Your point is designed so as to be inherently biased against a green agenda.


Well... people are using fear of global warming to advance agendas be they political and/or social. Agenda’s that may be well meaning (but then again, may not) but end up doing more harm than good if actually implemented. However, the other side does use fear as a tactic ("they’re commies who want to take away your property rights!"), fear is the oldest weapon in the human arsenal.

quote:

You speak of collectivist agendas, you explicitly state that any collectivist agenda leads to totalitarianism. That is simply not true.

I’m not including small communes (although many of them are weird cults with stringent – and strange – rules) but am referring to collectivism on a national level. Collectivism on a national level means a small group of people at the top making all the decisions, economic (i.e. central planing) as well as political. Aside from the fact that power attracts the corruptible, there is the fact that not everyone will want to go along with the powers that be. Coercion then becomes necessary. Collectivism in its’ purest form – communism (in which those at the top have no accountability to the people) – has always been oppressive. With socialism those at the top have some accountability (they may always be voted out) but the socialist agenda does restrict people's freedom of choice.

quote:

The UK utilises collectivist thinking in running its national health service, collectivist thinking is implied by any standing army...regardless of nationality. To think as a collective is merely to think about how some challenges must be faced by our society as a group, not as individuals. You jump all the way from working as a group to dictatorships.

There is a difference in working as a group based upon general consensus and working as a group under the whip of a tiny minority.

Yes, armies are an example of collectives. In fact they are a great example – a tiny few at the top make all the important decisions while the majority at the bottom are kept under a strict discipline. They have to be. Most people’s natural impulse is to walk away from the sound of gun fire. Coercion, as well as massive propaganda, are necessary to get them to walk toward gun fire. Armies serve a specific purpose however and in western nations they are ultimately (in theory anyway) under a civilian authority.

As for nationalized health care systems, well that’s another whole can of worms that I really don’t want to get into right now (it’s getting late and I have to get up early tomorrow). Suffice it to say I am not in favor of my health care decisions being made by a committee.

quote:

.......what is it you really fear about collectivist thinking?

Group Think... the greatest enabler of human tragedy.

quote:

You talk about seeing the environment as a challenge rather than a fear, i tend to agree with this......but a challenge can only be faced once it is acknowledged. To deny the human impact on climate change is not how one acknowledges a challenge to be faced.....to admit the truth of human activity in this regard is not to give in to fear.

Then it should be treated as a challenge and not a fear. Unfortunately the dialogue I see in the media tends toward the fear aspect. It is the things that fear lead to – rash decisions and incivility for starters – that I (ironically) fear. Rather than moving forward with simple, common sense ideas, people are becoming increasingly polarized, shouting invectives at each other (and sometimes worse) and not bothering to listen to each other or consider what motivates the other side. No good can come of this.

Wow. This thread is like the Energizer Bunny. It just keep going and going. It’s going to take me a while to get caught up - if I want to get caught up.


_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 528
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 2:49:21 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

Due to the SALT treaties which Carter initiated, neither side could develop any sort of missile defense system.  Within reason, of course.


SALT I:

Anti-ballistic missile defenses (ABM) system were "banned" under SALT I which was started by Richard Nixon in 1969, and was signed in 1971.  Part of the treaty was to limit ABM systems to one per nation.  The USSR had one (that didn't work very well) covering Moscow.  The US proposed one to cover some of it's silos, but I don't think it was ever built.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

Our missile warning system deals with ballistic missiles, which is a missile which takes off from the surface of the planet, gets semi-orbital, and then drops out like a bomb from outer space.  The only really effective way to even track a ballistic missile is to figure out what type of ballistic missile it is during it's launch phase, and then figure out where it is capable of landing.


These type of missiles are generally referred to as intercontinental ballistic missiles.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

SCUDs are not a ballistic missile.  Our entire missile defense system was useless during the gulf war.



SCUD ballistic missiles.

SCUDS, on the other hand, are simply ballistic missiles. Sometimes they are referred to as tactical or theatre ballistic missiles, because of their limited range.

Ballistic missiles:

Ballistic missile: A missile that travels to its target unpowered and unguided after being launched and at a velocity such that it will follow a flight trajectory to a desired point. Part of the flight of longer-range ballistic missiles may occur outside the atmosphere and involve the "reentry" of the missile.

Here is a world wide listing of ballistic missiles, including the SCUD in all it's variations:

Worldwide Ballistic Missile Inventories

***
As for you comment "Our entire missile defense system was useless during the gulf war", I'm not sure what, exactly, you are basing this conclusion on, so it's hard to objectively answer it.

I also looked for something more definitive about your "WHOPR" system.

You said:
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

3 years into the contract, the Soviet Union went toes up and we no longer had a threat of a mass raid of atomic weapons being fired at us.

The contract bigwigs did not even pause in their determination to build the thing to think "gee, maybe another 4 years and 4 billion dollars is a waste of money now that we no longer have an enemy with thousands of nuclear missiles they are planning on firing at us."


Since the USSR went "toes up" all through-out 1991, and officially disbanded in December of that year, this would put your computer project at approximately 1988 to 1995.

Now, see, this is where I have a problem.

Up until well after 1988, the SDI program was simply in the exploration and technical feasibility study stage.  In fact, in 1988, Congress slashed what little funding that was going to the program to almost next to nothing.

No systems were in place.  I don't remember any major SDI related upgrades to the NORAD base being discussed, or funded.  Perhaps it was a "black account" in the budget?

But, as a matter of fact, because of the Gulf War, Congress passed the 1991 Missile Defense Act, requiring the deployment of a missile shield, and a total of 4.3 billion dollars was requested for the 1993 - and this was a substantial increase over the axed feasibility studies.

And, since there were no systems in place (until recently, as a matter of fact - 2004).  And the focus has changed since the demise of the USSR, away from a "national" shield, to what's generally called "theater threats" (this distinction is kinda nebulous, and isn't officially used anymore, either).

As a matter of fact, the total budget for a national missile defense was to only be $3 billion over a five year period.

 But ... this is why I asked you about the name of the program.  It's possible that you are talking about upgrades to the computer system for the Boost Surveillance and Tracking System (BSTS)?

hmmm, no, probably not, because in 1990 and 1991, the SDIO restructured the ballistic missile defense architecture and initiated the Brilliant Pebbles and Brilliant Eyes programs and terminated the BSTS program.

Or is the time frame perhaps incorrect?

Now, the Cheyenne Mountain Upgrade (CMU) program was started in 1989, and they had several problems with it, but it wasn't a "Star Wars" system at all, although it did include tracking possible missile launches ... but it had nothing really to do with shooting them down.

According to the Federation of American Scientist (FAS):

CMU was placed on the DOT&E oversight list in 1990. In 1991 a test concept centered around end-to-end tests was approved for each of the three missions: air defense, space control, and missile warning. Several subsystems were tested between 1991 and 1993 with mixed results. Subsequently, three IOT&Es scheduled for 1993 had to be delayed or suspended because of software problems. Two IOT&Es conducted in 1994 identified serious performance and integration problems; and CMU breached its Acquisition Program Baseline. DOT&E assessed the CMU program in 1994 as neither operationally effective nor suitable.

According to FAS, the system was re-evaluated, and they spent another $48 million, but the results were pretty good.  Total cost about $2 billion from 1989 to 1996, even with the problems early in the program.

Again, this didn't really have much to do with "Star Wars".  Just the normal "watching everything in the sky" that has always been NORAD's mission.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Also, do you have an official name to the project?  The closest I could find to "WHOPR" was the fictional WOPR (War Operation Plan Response) computer system in the movie WarGames.

FirmKY


I used to have a computer user account on a computer named "WHOPER" in Cheyenne Mountain, the home of NORAD.

But apparently you are more in tune with our missile defense system than I am.

Go you.



If you say so.

Yeah.  I guess I am.

Go you, too.

FirmKY

< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 12/29/2006 3:49:20 AM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 529
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 3:18:11 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Are you saying it is right and proper for the US government to actively engage in the overthrow of a soverign nations government baised on the perceived zeitgeist of the period?


hmmm ...

Yes.

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 530
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 4:39:49 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Are you saying it is right and proper for the US government to actively engage in the overthrow of a soverign nations government baised on the perceived zeitgeist of the period?


hmmm ...

Yes.



and I bet you wonder why 9/11 happened.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 531
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 5:10:43 AM   
sleazy


Posts: 781
Joined: 11/23/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

Group Think... the greatest enabler of human tragedy.



Immediate memories of jokes about mice built to government specification and the brain/mouth ratio of committees spring to mind

_____________________________

Opinion is packaged by weight not volume, contents may settle during transit. Consult you medical practitioner. Do not attempt to stop moving parts by hand. Ensure all safety shields in place. Open this way up. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50C

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 532
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 5:12:24 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Are you saying it is right and proper for the US government to actively engage in the overthrow of a soverign nations government baised on the perceived zeitgeist of the period?


hmmm ...

Yes.



and I bet you wonder why 9/11 happened.


LOL!


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 533
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 6:28:37 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b


I’m not including small communes (although many of them are weird cults with stringent – and strange – rules) but am referring to collectivism on a national level. Collectivism on a national level means a small group of people at the top making all the decisions, economic (i.e. central planing) as well as political. Aside from the fact that power attracts the corruptible, there is the fact that not everyone will want to go along with the powers that be. Coercion then becomes necessary. Collectivism in its’ purest form – communism (in which those at the top have no accountability to the people) – has always been oppressive. With socialism those at the top have some accountability (they may always be voted out) but the socialist agenda does restrict people's freedom of choice.



So you don't think the richest 1% in the US that own 40% of all the wealth of the USA have an unequal influence on decision making there?  You don't think government is overly sensitive towards their interest? Do you really think the government cares as much for a grease monkey as conniving fraudster that has accumulated millions of dollors in wealth? Do you really believe your vote is as good a millionaire's who is funding the politician you are voting for?

Doesn't look that good does it but at least if you don't interfer in their wealth making you can pollute to your heart's content and buy all the trash you need.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 534
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 6:28:38 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Are you saying it is right and proper for the US government to actively engage in the overthrow of a soverign nations government baised on the perceived zeitgeist of the period?


hmmm ...

Yes.



and I bet you wonder why 9/11 happened.


So, I guess what you mean is, that the 3000+ people who were murdered on 9/11 ... deserved it?

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 535
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 6:32:40 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Are you saying it is right and proper for the US government to actively engage in the overthrow of a soverign nations government baised on the perceived zeitgeist of the period?


hmmm ...

Yes.



and I bet you wonder why 9/11 happened.


So, I guess what you mean is, that the 3000+ people who were murdered on 9/11 ... deserved it?

FirmKY



I'm saying if the US hadn't spent the last 50 years overthrowing legitimate governments, killing innocent civilians and generally interfering in everyone elses affairs to exploit their assets, there probably wouldn't be the sort of anti-Americanism around that feeds such extremism that manifested itself on 9/11.

But you agree with the US's foreign policy so you are obviously willing to take the backlash.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 536
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 7:44:04 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
See ... there you go again!

Some of American foreign policy I agree with.  Some I don't. 

Some I might have agreed with at the time, but in retrospect maybe not all policies were the best in the long run.

But they seemed like a good idea at the time, mostly. 

But seriously, now ... what was asked exactly was:

Are you saying it is right and proper for the US government to actively engage in the overthrow of a soverign nations government baised on the perceived zeitgeist of the period?

Now, this was a loaded question if I ever saw one!

Do I think every country should be overthrown?  No.  But I also don't agree with "never" either.  We overthrew the Japanese government didn't we?  Not to mention the Italians.  There are a few others.

Oh, and Afghanistan, recently, too.

You don't think the US had a right to "overthrow ... a soverign [sic] nations government" in these cases?

Can't have it both ways, meat.  Either a nation has the right to overthrow the government of another nation, or it doesn't.

Isn't that what you guys are talking about?

oh, yeah and "perceived zeitgeist of the period" is really kinda vague, too.

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 537
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 7:52:31 AM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
I don't think I've seen (in modern history) anyone disputing the rights of ancient Greeks or Romans or Mongolians or Venutians to overthrow any other government.  I don't see lawsuits filed by India against the British Government sueing for damages.  I don't see Latin American countries demanding justice against Spain.

This concept that nations shouldn't interfere with other nations is actually relatively new, and I would suggets prompted by the development of the Atomic Bomb - never before in history was one sizable, reasonably powerful country capable of wiping out another sizable, equally powerful country overnight.

And, as we saw with the rise of Nazi Germany, if the US attempted to adopt a 'hands off' policy towards the rest of the world, how long would it be before door lands on our doorstep?  The world isn't getting bigger - it's getting smaller.  The noisy neighbor isn't just across the street - we hear them on the other side of the planet, now.


_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 538
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 7:59:06 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Are you saying it is right and proper for the US government to actively engage in the overthrow of a soverign nations government baised on the perceived zeitgeist of the period?


hmmm ...

Yes.

FirmKY


FirmhandKY:
So you are saying that it is right and proper for another country to try to overthrow the US government based on the perceived zeitgeist of the period.  Which would mean that you approve of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the sept 11 attack on the WTC.
This would appear to be at odds with your professed dedication of the rule of law.
Is there some part of the constitution of the United States that might support this position?
thompson

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 539
RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. - 12/29/2006 8:01:29 AM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

So you don't think the richest 1% in the US that own 40% of all the wealth of the USA have an unequal influence on decision making there?  You don't think government is overly sensitive towards their interest? Do you really think the government cares as much for a grease monkey as conniving fraudster that has accumulated millions of dollors in wealth? Do you really believe your vote is as good a millionaire's who is funding the politician you are voting for?

Doesn't look that good does it but at least if you don't interfer in their wealth making you can pollute to your heart's content and buy all the trash you need.


I know that my vote is as good as the millionaires.  I also know that if I don't like the candidates, I have the option to try to oppose them.  That the American public has been lulled into a sense of apathy is not the result of millionaires buying sleeping pills for them.

So, in the end, every person who votes in the US ends up casting three votes - his, and two more because two people aren't voting.  Bush didn't win the votes of half the people - he was voted for about a quarter of the population.

That the wealthiest would be most likely to take a personal interest in politics isn't a flaw of the system.  If I have stock in Microsoft, I'll take more of an interest in what Microsoft does with my investment. 

I also know that the government doesn't care for either millionaires or grease monkeys, aside from the coverage both can give in the news and the amount of money they fork over in investments. 

Either way, I'd be curious to hear a better way to do business....


_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 540
Page:   <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Failure of the world-wide capitalist system ... kinda. Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

1.158