meatcleaver
Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth MC, Is it now "exploitation" to buy goods? In the process of western expansion, western governments have and still do, force countries to trade with the west on the west's terms. The west has even manufactured governments and countries in order to exploit assets from a particular region. The middle east is a prime example, where countries and governments were created in the interests of the west rather than the indigenous peoples. Globalisation is now becoming an issue in the west because the geo-political tables are being turned. With the rise of China and India the west can envisage a future where it is no longer the boss and can no longer call the tune. Concern is mounting because China is not only willing to out bid the west for oil but is happy not to involve itself in the internal politics of other countries and so is a more attractive customer than the west. Many countries can manufacture products cheaper than the west and even in hi-tech, the west can envisage a day when it won't have the monopoly. The problem of globalisation, is that the world doesn't have enough resources for everyone but this has never been the concern of the west or has never been until now, when the west is finding itself in a position where it is struggling compete. To answer Juliaocean's point My academic discipline makes me care much more than you would think, unless of course you are using the "royal" we. Since universal suffrage in the west, western electorates have consistently voted for short term self interest. That doesn't mean that there aren't individuals that are concerned but it shows in general as a culture, we have not been concerned.
_____________________________
There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.
|