RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub.

RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

allalone47 -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 10:38:38 PM)
No. No one was played. Thank you for all your help, but it is over.

TemptingNviceSub -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 10:42:15 PM)
[sm=idea.gif]....I am totally confuffled!......Tempting

tieyouupandplay -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 10:45:11 PM)
kneel and u will understand, pet

SweetDommes -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 10:45:28 PM)
[sm=biggrin.gif] Oh yeah, we got played ... Oh, and tieyouup ... this isn't where you troll for some thrills ...

allalone47 -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 10:47:52 PM)
Thank you Sweet Dommes. And no one was played but i is over. Thred is closed.

SweetDommes -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 10:48:40 PM)
Only a mod can close a thread - and now that the troll has arrived, it's rather amusing ...

asubmissiveheart -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 10:49:54 PM)
This is a great way to begin 2007

SweetDommes -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 10:52:47 PM)
I know, isn't it? I mean, here I was mad that someone had decided to pk me on an online rpg so they could steal my stuff (thankfully, I didn't lose anything of value - I bet they were mad [sm=biggrin.gif]) and then here they come, lining up to entertain me ... [;)]

kajiramre -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 11:10:24 PM)
me thinks that someone just read the IM that the poster sent to the poor folks involved in this and they had a tizzy fit!

SweetDommes -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (12/31/2006 11:25:28 PM)
Also a very definite possibility - either way, I'm still amused (or is that bemused?)

spankoramanyc -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (1/1/2007 12:40:16 AM)
Wow....this has my head spinning and I don't think it was the champagne. In regards to spell check. I must admit to a loud guffaw when I read that spell check had been completely wiped out FOREVER from his computer and nothing could EVER be done to fix it. I love dramatic statements like this. That being said, we alllllll make typos. It happens, we are human. BUT, if you have a suspicion that you have a slight spelling problem may I suggest something that might just remedy your situation. Get a dictionary. Mr. Webster gave us a wonderful gift. I'm sure that you are allowed to own one and that there is not some special force field surrounding your house that will prevent you from EVER owning or using a dictionary. whew. Ok, maybe the champagne is talking a bit. Happy New Year All.

LTRsubNW -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (1/1/2007 6:28:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: allalone47 Spell Check Won't Work, And This Site Doen't Have A Spell Check On It!!! (Your word processor does have it however...and it does work. Every computer sold since Microsoft began creating operating systems has a word processor of some sort).

LTRsubNW -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (1/1/2007 6:29:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LotusSong ORIGINAL: allalone47 OK, I have a new post and I do believe this may have been done before. I have been talking to a sub, on this site, and no I will not say who, because if that person wants to talk about it, that person will come here and talk for them self. This person was seeking a Top to this persons Top M to their sub. The problem the other was sub as well and wants the first to Top the 2nd from the bottom. Now the other sub is putting demands on the first, to top the 2nd, and the 1st is having problems. I have been talking to the one, but not the other, though I did tell the one to tell the other, to come onto this site and also for the 1st to check this site out as well as other sites, talk with those here and look in the forums for information. So Tops, Bottoms, Masters, Mistresses, Dommes and Doms: Here is something that you all can help with. This is for real. I'm relying on you for some answers to this dilemma. I can't talk to vanilla people about this. (Does this help?) (Thank you Lotus....tremendously :) )

LTRsubNW -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (1/1/2007 6:32:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LotusSong This may be best if moved to the Ask a Switch forum. Actually, even with your exceptional efforts at cleaning up the prose, I think it would be best moved to the "Ask an Editor who can clean up whatever the hell he's saying and make some kind of logical sequencing and sense out of it" forum.

TexasMaam -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (1/1/2007 10:33:45 AM)
That helps, LotusSong! Thanks! I've seen, but not been involved in, situations where someone indentified themselves as a M Dom but was in actuality a sub who could not accept his own submissiveness. This particular individual is still active, still presents as a Dom, is still a m sub, and still gets involved with a female submissive so that he can later 'command her' to bind and flog him, etc. Sadly, a female submissive who was a close personal friend of Mine came into contact with this Idiot and suffered terribly until she finally had the good sense to get out of the relationship altogether! All I can say is that someone who presents as a Dom, who is - in their heart of hearts- a sub-----, does *tremendous damage* to everyone they come in contact with. allalone47, the best option in such a situation is for any submissive, who needs and is hoping for a Dom, to RUN as far and as fast from such a toxic situation as possible. No, I'm not referring to switches. I'm referring to those Doms, usually male, who present as Dom but who crave to submit and long to be submissives, and who inflict their topsy turvy psychosis on every sub they come into contact with. They're out there. Get away from them. TexasMaam

allalone47 -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (1/1/2007 4:45:33 PM)
A viress that someone sent tough the system took it out . The system does work only on emails but not on web sites do to the fix that was put in. And then the system was done in a way that put a permant systme in however it was only to a dagree to work on things that need to be done. Web sites were not part of the new repair. Oh and the repair had to baypass the system that cam with the computer do to the viress permantly fryed it and many other things.It was a total reprograming of the computer. And a almost total deleation of the all the other programing. It took several years and sever thousands of dollars to fix what someone did in a gigasecond.It destroyed the antyviress programs first, and trhen went to the hard drive, and other systems next. The repairs took time do the the fixxes were not done all at once. The first thing that was don was the permant walling off of the viress, During the fixxing prossess everthing that was walled off was transfurred to a scrap comuter though a program my tec has and that was junked. He had that computer for that reason.

Fitznicely -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (1/2/2007 4:49:30 AM)
dude, reinstall.

Celeste43 -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (1/2/2007 6:08:30 AM)
Someone really didn't know they were a sub? Come off it. You got played. You weren't the first one and you won't be the last. Conversely you could be making a common mistake which is to assume that dominant means sadistic and submissive means masochistic. There are many sadistic submissives who enjoy thinking up evil things to do to people, and who may indeed topping while at the same time being submissive to one. There are also a great many tops who enjoy having sensation play performed on them. However, if you were talking to a top who would order you to perform sensation play on him, he should have been honest about it in the beginning because many subs are uncomfortable doing so. He should have looked for a sadistic sub who would enjoy wielding the flogger when ordered to, and being submissive the rest of the time. Try IESpell, easily downloadable. However your misuse of there for their caused us to read this as a situation with a top and two subs. Additionally Top M sounded like a reference to a person or possibly to a top with a sub initialled M. Highly incoherent and the unhelpful results are the results of your incoherence.

kishasub -> RE: Sub seeking Top but got sub. (1/2/2007 6:25:16 AM)
Gawd i got a headache now, [:(]

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.492188E-02