|
HatesParisHilton -> RE: Cameras and Webcams (1/30/2007 3:14:39 PM)
|
I don't see why ANYTHING sexual has to be shown. A woman showing her face, slightly modified by freeware can prove honesty about age. Same with bodytype, even wearing a moderately conservative top/shirt/blouse and pair of non tight but non baggy jeans, which is what people at the mall or supermarket would see her in. Easy enough to tell if a woman or male is "for real" after that, and the question of "fake footage" is easily remedied by the person requesting the clip to ask a simple non sexual question of the person, they answer, thus we know the clip is recent.
Any top or sub that can't figure out that someone is attractive or "real" after that kinda clip is either after wankerage or suffered a massive brain fever as a child and never recovered. You can be hot as hell in track suit pants and have someone be panting after you, you can be "ack" in a pair of $500 PVC buttless pants/skirt. Besides, it's not like if you decide to meet someone for coffee at Starbucks first you or they will be wearing fetish gear (or if they are, well, look for the hidden camera from "Punk'd").
Though another thing to consider is that not all "wanking"/masturbation is visual/sexual. There is "emotional" wanking, in which someone wants e-mails/phone calls/messenger that inspire them to daydream about the romance/relationship etc., which frankly is still masturbation if someone spends more than a minute swooning over these. Just like people that buy the crappy Anne Rice Beauty books but never "get off" (physically or psychologically) on visual stimulus such as other people might.
Guess what? Still wankerage. It's just THEIR wankerage vs. the wankerage of the other person asking for a visual, and sorry, it takes equal effort, so it's equal wankerage. They just value THEIR side more than the other person's.
|
|
|
|
