harmony3709 -> RE: Dominants - Giver, Healer, Mentor, Friend? (3/10/2005 7:39:46 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FragileRose Yup, I mean obliged. In a D/s relationship, which is what I am talking about, the Master/Dom makes a commitment to take care of the well being, safety, and health of his submissive while she is in his care. This is a theme that comes up in a great deal of D/s writing. For me, this is one of the most appealing aspects of D/s. There is no way that I am going to place myself into the service of someone that does not recognize the primary importance of this obligation. Uh-oh......the dreaded "O" word, that goes with the "R" word, that goes with the "C" word. Obligation, responsibility, committment. I agree that these are things that are frequently written about regarding a D/s or M/s relationship, although personally I think they are overused as a way of sort of romanticizing a BDSM-oriented relationship. However, in principal, I would like to see them used more often out of those romantic, fantasy, Sir-Lancalot-and-the-sex-slave-living-in-BDSM-Camelot stories and erotic literature because I have seen too many shudder at those words. (As is also the case in the vanilla world as well, this is not exclusive to BDSM relationships.) If one takes charge and possession of another human being, does that not come with obligation and responsibility? I would like to think so. I know in the relationships I have been in as a submissive, I certainly have felt obliged to fulfill my responsibilities and committments. Speaking from strictly my own personal experience, I have found that the traits you mentioned in the OP, giver healer, mentor, etc., are the most rare. harmony
|
|
|
|