RE: Sissies - is it all about them?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Sissies - is it all about them?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Sissies - is it all about them?

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Sissies - is it all about them? - 4/4/2007 4:50:23 PM

tobeshi

Posts: 27
Joined: 3/30/2007
Status: offline

It may depend on the individuals involved. For me it is part of who I am but by no means the whole of who I am. I did not choose to be like this but am happy with me the way I am, much the same way a mistress is happy with herself. There is an amount of mutual dependency between the roles for either or both dom and cd to be fulfilled. It is about both parties but to varing degrees. Both should understand and accept the motivating force driving each other.As MS Isabelle stated, if dressing is all there were to it...do it yourself ; and I agree. It is fun to dress by yourself ( for practice) but does lack purpose and direction. To be able to dress for someone who appreciates, is into it or be dressed by someone and share the experience and whatever may result from it is exhilirating. To get dressed is nice, to get dressed and serve someone who supports this preference is heavenly. It is an art, to try and constantly strive for an unachievable level of excellence in the most sincerest form of flattery....to imitate. I can never be a female, even if I would have the sugeries I could only come closer, but never reach that excellence. The best I can do is to serve a GG and offer myself to her. If she prefers me as a male so be it, it is her choice. If she desires me enfemme, it is my fortune and I will try even harder as tribute to her for considering my desites too.True, many TV/CD take it to riduculous extremes and make a mockery of the role. This may suggest that the preference is largely selfserving for just for the (sissy,CD,TV ).I believe for those of us who are serious about it, dressing is just another form of self expression and an extension of ourselves that, like any other trait can either be accepted and embraced or rejected out of hand, depending upon the parties involved and their preferences.

(in reply to BalletBob)

Profile

Post #: 81

RE: Sissies - is it all about them? - 4/4/2007 8:55:33 PM

SquirtMistress

Posts: 14
Joined: 2/28/2007
Status: offline

I have asked my sub which he prefers to dress him, and he said a natural born woman. I adore him when he is Chrissy, cutest thin ya ever did see, and he has more passion when dressed!

(in reply to LadyEllen)

Profile

Post #: 82

RE: Sissies - is it all about them? - 4/7/2007 4:14:36 AM

iwearpanties

Posts: 509
Joined: 7/21/2005
Status: offline

ok question ust cause a male likes wearing panties and other itmes dose this realy make him a sissy? also for the Mistress "es what would you say in your eyes is a real sissy type male / sub?

(in reply to SquirtMistress)

Profile

Post #: 83

RE: Sissies - is it all about them? - 4/10/2007 6:54:03 AM

Mustardseed

Posts: 291
Joined: 5/27/2006
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline

I would say that the difference between a sissy and a femmed male is the camp factor.

A submissive man in a dress, whether he can pass for a woman or not, can be very attractive. He can still behave like himself, but possibly with a sleeker, more graceful air about him. Or maybe not. Sometimes a skirt -- even with all the applicable foundation wear -- gets treated pretty much like a public-use tartan kilt -- "hey, I'm a guy getting a breeze. whee!"

A sissy seems to go for affectations that specifically lead them to be some specific not-quite-female gender. Given the books I've been reading:

high pitched voice
elbows close to the sides and limp wrists
behaving as a weak and easily paniced person
usually acting far younger than their actual age

Sissification seems to involve a specific sort of role play that isn't necessarily in simple cross dressing or even general feminization. So, to answer your question, no -- a femmed up man doesn't have to fall into what I would consider a sissy category.

(in reply to iwearpanties)

Profile

Post #: 84