MistressWoulf -> RE: How do you know when... (3/19/2005 11:02:21 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MidnightWriter I've argued strongly against the slogan "Safe, Sane, Consensual" - I'm not going to add "Healthy" to that mix and pretend to be a social worker. I've seen this social/sexual orientation whitewashed to the point of seeming totally safe and uber-healthy - but pretending to be a Public Service isn't my kink, and I'm not going to do it. I'm a control-freak sexual pervert, enjoying many things that would horrify Aunt Mabel - and I can live with that. I'm looking for potential partners who want a dominant pervert - I'm not looking for the world's wounded, so I can take good care of them, while we pretend to practice d/s. I have to applaud that paragraph right there. So refreshing to see a man honestly state what he is and not bullshit around about it. My desire to dominate men is far different than my desire to dominate a woman. (Actually my heterosexual relationships are mostly vanilla.) I want to hurt a woman, make her cry, humiliate her, use her for my own sexual satisfaction, brand her, beat her, make her "mine." Anyone with any background in psychology will tell you that's not "normal" nor healthy. It sure as hell ain't "sane." If a woman gives her consent to me, then that's all I need. I've had enough therapy and my sexual kinks are still there. Right now, I'm forcing myself not to get involved with a woman because she has some past issues/traumas that I just couldn't handle dealing with if she were to suddenly fall apart. I don't want to take on that responsibility, and if I chose to take ownership of her, it would become my responsibility. I'll be here for her as a friend, but only that. I'm not her mother nor am I qualified to be a therapist. I have a son, and he's all the children I need right now. CitizenCane, I agree when you gave your little caveat about a woman's seeming submission could be the result of other underlying issues. Speaking as someone who was once a delicate young woman completely ignorant of sex (well, not completely ignorant; I had my father's Penthouse mags), I know that I acted in ways that some would perceive as giving my consent to be dominated. It was actually more of a case of me not knowing that I could say no. I'm sure someone like you would be experienced enough to pick up on the signs, but there are men out there that take advantage of something like that. Yes, I speak from experience (no, not rape, but not far off either). Some women do still just go along with men because they believe that is what they are supposed to do. We're told from a tiny young age that some day Prince Charming is going to come and sweep us of our feet and magically whisk us away to some far of castle to live happily ever after. So when a man shows interest in us, we think we should let him take charge. Sure, that's changing, but my family is old fashioned and women have a "place" by their way of thinking. Personally, as a woman and knowing how some women can feel, I'd prefer to have the verbal consent as well as a conversation so I can be sure she knows what she's getting herself into. Sure, I might get an idea upon meeting a woman that she *might* like to be dominated in some fashion, but I just think it's far better to get a verbal understanding.
|
|
|
|