RE: Magradoodle vs Vangurdoodle (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Vendaval -> RE: Magradoodle vs Vangurdoodle (3/23/2007 10:28:38 AM)

Hold on a minute!  I need to write this one down,
a new name for a super-doodle dildo!   [8D]


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Ingvald the Intruder




FukinTroll -> RE: Magradoodle vs Vangurdoodle (3/23/2007 10:49:02 AM)

Fun with labels, a short story by DrFuknSuess.
 
It was a dark and rainy night when the little Vangurdoodle walked into the dungeon. She waded through the ocean of snarflak and Umbo’bumbledee magradoodle’s, Mogo`ga`doodio’s and Vangooderschmit ‘s. She was a bit famished and made her way to the snack table and she filled her plate with some light snickerdoodles and cup~o~doodles. She then scanned the room spotting right away all the pink poodles that were struggling to discern if this was the snarflak and Umbo’bumbledee lifestyle choice for them. She happened across a scene where two Shoobeedoobeedoo’s where playing leap frog. One Shoobeedoobeedoo would leap over the other landing on all fours and the other would smack her with a paddle and then make his leap to be smacked in turn. This gave her a chuckle at the efficiency of being a Shoobeedoobeedoo. She moved further into the room and watched who she thought to be a Mogo`ga`doodio by all his expert posting on Rumpinrompingtearingswearingkapooskie giving a Mogo`ga`doodio a Skodilieodileeatonatonvatatanchew and bent over for some heavy Rumpinrompingtearingswearingkapooskie pounding by a Vangooderschmit and he was loving every minute of it.
 
 
The moral of the story is it doesn’t really matter what label you are using, each of us have our own idea’s of what we are looking for and want to be a part of. The label only gives us a glimpse of where the other is coming from. Time will be the end all tell all of compatibility.




mythi -> RE: Magradoodle vs Vangurdoodle (3/23/2007 11:37:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeste43

Sorry, that sounds like you're changing people's basic cores and that I just don't believe. We basically are who we are and we do best in a relationship where the other person likes who we are from the start and doesn't have a great need to change them. I changed some habits for the ex but the fact that he needed to do that created a distance between us. As he had problems with intimacy, it's possible he did this in order to create the distance he needed to feel safe. His problem, not mine.


I think many would agree, but there are also those who desire to be changed...shaped into someone else's ideal.  Altho' I'm not sure if you could really call that changing their basic core since one could argue that it's at their basic core to want to be transformed.   I suppose only they could try to answer that. 




mstrjx -> RE: Magradoodle vs Vangurdoodle (3/23/2007 12:11:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mythi

There are also those who desire to be changed...shaped into someone else's ideal. 



I have 'things' that I'll call 'preferences'.  Arguably you could call them 'fetishes' of sorts.  Of course we don't wish to delve too further into the subject of objectification, do we?

Regardless, making preferences known with a partner a) who doesn't see the harm, and b) wishes to please, means that there is some form of transformation.

I've long since gotten to the point where I don't wish to build the Empire State Building from a lump of clay.  But if I can take something I already desire and enhance it's desireability to not only myself but to my partner as well, then I think it's easily worth the effort, for both parties.

Jeff




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625