RE: No underwear? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive



Message

slave4One -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 12:48:08 AM)

Greetings A/all...

*laughing*   This girl's HATED panties since she was a child!  At 3 years old her parents were receiving phone calls from neighbors asking why their lil girls' panties were hanging from the car door handles!  LOL
Besides not liking them... a girl is to be readily accesible, to be used in any way what-so-ever that pleases Master... *grins*.
Never had any problems with yeast infections either, save for after having finished a round of antibiotics.. and that's preventable too... *laughs*  course, she had to learn that the hard way too.
Best Wishes,
~slave



BoundDragon -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 5:44:11 AM)

I have to agree with the general opinion on here. It is granting your master access whenever he chooses, also a humiliation technique for some.. going out and feeling like everyone knows you arent wearing any.

I love to be ordered not to wear them sometimes... it does get me on edge and excited and all the time I know that all he had to do was slide his hand towards me and he could do anything he likes... in private or in public.[:)]



OsideGirl -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 8:14:28 AM)

Actually, Master prefers that I wear panties. His view is that what is underneath them belongs to him and is not for someone else's eyes.



iwearpanties -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 8:52:22 AM)

if i may as a submissive male here i love a woman to be in her panties . there sexy and also get the mind going as well... at least for me it dose .. as one of  you stated smaller and tighter fitting panties are very very hot   this is anmiage i love seeing on females ... ive seena few in public were her panties where small and tight and you see this thur the pants or slacks



KnightofMists -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 11:43:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: unsung

.  I don't see the logic,


Why does logic need to be required.   Some things stretch beyond logic... sometimes the only answer is... Because!



TemptingNviceSub -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 12:10:33 PM)

Requesting of the no panties .....Dominants do it because they can, plain and simple as that....personally,such requests to me show a bit of a lack of imagination, or even a bit of laziness to get to what he wants. But if that is what he wants then that is what he gets....Tempting..~gee,I hope I didnt sound toooo cranky~[8|]



unsung -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 12:11:20 PM)

Well KnightofMists, because is not a formuable answer, it answers nothing, it states nothing, it varifies absolutely nothing, hence 'because' is not a logical reason.  The logic in this thread seems to stem from one that One that wants access anytime anyplace for whatever reason they chose, and the other logic seems to be that due to the visual and mental appeal of One that desire to have their minds caressed with what is underneath the material boundaries (aka thong, panties, whatever).  'Because' just finds no rationale in my mind, it is inconclusive.



KnightofMists -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 12:15:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: unsung

Well KnightofMists, because is not a formuable answer, it answers nothing, it states nothing, it varifies absolutely nothing, hence 'because' is not a logical reason.  The logic in this thread seems to stem from one that One that wants access anytime anyplace for whatever reason they chose, and the other logic seems to be that due to the visual and mental appeal of One that desire to have their minds caressed with what is underneath the material boundaries (aka thong, panties, whatever).  'Because' just finds no rationale in my mind, it is inconclusive.


and my answer is still... "Because"  you seek to have the answer you want... and not accept the answer that is given.  You qualify what the answer should be.. so why ask the question if you can't accept the answer as given.

again.. sometimes logic is not a part of every answer.  Sometimes.. it's just Because.



unsung -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 1:21:06 PM)

KnightofMists, I can accept whatever effort goes into answering any question, and I accept your answer is 'because', and my response to anyone and everyone that has responded to this thread that I do appreciate their response.  Some like panties some don't and for some it is just because.  And due to the fact you inquired as to  'Why does logic need to be required.' I gave you a response as to why from my processing, enough said and thank you. 



slaveluci -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 2:12:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kyraofMists
Because he likes it that way.  He likes thinking about the fact that I am in a business meeting, looking professional and have nothing on underneath my skirt. 
Knight's kyra


Exactly!  This is a big turn on for my Master as well.  Thinking of me sitting in board meetings sans panties simply because He said to is something He really enjoys.  In addition, He often has me to wear my chastity belt to work.  On one occasion, i was hosting a special event where a US Senator was our guest speaker.  i had to go before the group and welcome him and introduce him all while wearing a skirt with nothing underneath but my chastity belt locked on tight.  Master still talks about that one [;)]  He knows He has total control of His property and showing it in little ways like this is simply something that brings Him much pleasure.  THAT is why, no other reason is necessary...........slave luci



Celeste43 -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 2:39:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: proudsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeste43

I'm no way near regular enough to know that Tuesday at 10:05 I'll start my period and getting blood over my clothes which will show is not something I'd consider appropriate. I guess the rest of you start with very light spotting unlike me.


One advantage of menopause.[:)]


I'm 52 and haven't hit it yet. My grandmother was 58 and I dread the thought of another six years of really awful cramps.



Obsidiansnamaste -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 4:13:21 PM)

Greetings,

It is for ease of access most obviously, and yet there are other, perhaps more subtle uses. For females who are used to the "protection" of panties, not having them on makes you very concious of one's sex, one's vulnerability. one tends to walk differently, sit differently and those slight changes in the pysche are a move towards being in touch with one's submission.



MissyRane -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 4:22:11 PM)

as long as i can wear trousers then underwear or not doesn't matter[;)]



BOUNTYHUNTER -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 4:27:16 PM)

NO panties are allowed here most of the time,THEY work in the vanilla world wearing dresses and skirts so they are allowed pantie hoses which must be removed as soon as they return home.I love them in tight tight jeans so the only exception to panties is to prevent yeast infections from the super tight jeans , down time is my time so an ounce of prevention is worth a Pound of cure....bounty



captainblack -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 4:47:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: unsung

This is an offshoot from a comment kyraofMists stated in another thread (pants) regarding 'not being allowed to wear underwear'. Now this just has me in awe, why are so many girls not permitted to wear underwear? I do not get the logic in this at all, *sits here baffled*. Please explain, anyone.


Read the "Story of O"

If a girl is kept in skirts and not allowed to wear underwear she can be taken at a moments notice
almost anytime or anywhere. Yes I know some will say just take the panties off, or push them
aside.....well sometimes they can not be removed......and depending on how the girl is built
and what sort of panties she has on they may not push aside for easy access.

It also keeps a girl constantly in mind that she may be sexualy used at a moment's notice
to be without panties.


In the mid 1800's female underware consisted of underskirts
and such....nothing like panties. The closest was bloomers with no crotch. This is one reason
it was such a scandlious situation for a lady to be alone with a gentleman for any non-trivial
amount of time.....just lift the skirt and get the job done.

I usually instruct a girl in my service to dress such that her sex can be accessed with no
effort on my part......that is when she is dressed.

Hope this helps you understand why some men want girls in service to them to be pantyless.


CB



sillygirl09 -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 7:22:42 PM)

Personally I hate wearing panties so always kind of get freaked when I meet a Dom who likes them ... of course it depends what I'm wearing but in general none works for me.



AquaticSub -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 8:20:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: unsung

This is an offshoot from a comment kyraofMists stated in another thread (pants) regarding 'not being allowed to wear underwear'.  Now this just has me in awe, why are so many girls not permitted to wear underwear?  I do not get the logic in this at all, *sits here baffled*.  Please explain, anyone.


Meh. I often go without when I'm wearing pants but it's not to turn anyone on. Depending on the length of the skirt in question, I may go without but it's not likely. Some skirts don't cover certain areas when you sit down and nobody wants to sit on your juices when you leave (particularly in a nice resturant!). Which I have to say is just rude. Otherwise it's kinda like wearing lacy panties as opposed to cotton. Whatever gets your gears turning. [:)]



slavegirljoy -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 9:23:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: unsung
Now this just has me in awe, why are so many girls not permitted to wear underwear?  I do not get the logic in this at all, *sits here baffled*.  Please explain, anyone.


Master likes to see His cunt shaved and spread whenever and wherever He chooses.  So, having me with no panties on and wearing a skirt allows Him to see what is His whenever He wants.  He also likes being able to reach in and grab and play with His slave's pussy anytime and not have to fight with panties to do it.
 
"Logic" doesn't have to have anything to do with anything my Master tells me to do.  Whatever He wants, He gets.
 
slave joy
Owned property of Master David




mythi -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 9:53:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

...nobody wants to sit on your juices when you leave (particularly in a nice resturant!). Which I have to say is just rude. [:)]


Yeah, those of us supplying more than adequate amounts of our own 'personal moisture' dont need to be squishing about in public places.  Nuff said.



FelinePersuasion -> RE: No underwear? (4/8/2007 10:52:40 PM)

Panty hose can trap heat and moister and can encourage yeast infections.
quote:

ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER

they are allowed pantie hoses which must be removed as soon as they return home.



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.109375