Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: "Acts of God" Riddle


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "Acts of God" Riddle Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 7:50:44 PM   
kisshou


Posts: 2425
Joined: 2/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

I can't help noticing that no one has responded to this, and I'm honestly curious to know how a serious believer would answer these questions, because whenever I get into a discussion with someone about God, the communication ends at this juncture. Generally one of three things happens:

A. I get no response.
B. I get a response that makes absolutely no sense. (For example, that human beings supposedly polluted the workings of the universe through their sinfulness, and that's why there are natural disasters today, though they did not exist in God's originally perfect creation. Of course, they had to have done this in a time before time.)
C. The other person gets seriously pissed off and starts insulting me.

Can ANYONE try to explain to me how the other side sees this? How did mankind's sins succeed in disrupting God's creation? Why did the omnibenevolent God allow this to happen? Why should innocents suffer today because of other people's sins? And what on earth does free will have to do with a tsunami?

Lam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Kenin,

Two questions for you:

1. Why does an omnibenevolent God even ALLOW natural disasters?

2. How does free will cause earthquakes?




This was answered, the answer is 'I don't know'.

I could propose alot of theories though (is that what you want?)

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 8:35:53 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: onceburned

I do not want to say that God is cruel, but I do not understand the motives of God. Why He intervenes in some cases and not others is a mystery to me. But yes, just and kind people often suffer - it would be nice to demand that God do something.


What these people that profess to be so smart do not understand, or can not understand, is that all things work together for good. There is a very good reason for miracles and the lack thereof. God uses people's trials and tribulations for the good of themselves and for the greater good. My mom is just one such example. She has suffered with MS for twenty years. Although she once asked for healing, she has now used her suffering to minister to thousands of people who are going through their own trials and tribulations. She and My father have even written a book to help others through their hours of need. Their suffering has touched the lives of thousands. How much better, then, then to be healed, say "thank you very much" and walk away.

Everything happens for a reason. There is a method to the madness. God "causes" nothing. For a BA in philosophy her logic is quite faulty. God allows things to happen for a reason. He will intervene where free will is not affected if it is within His will to do so.... Provided it is for the greater good.

People are blind. They do not see the workings of God because they are blind, too blind to see. W/we have been told as Christians that this would happen in the end times. Their hearts are hard. Their wisdom is but foolishness in the eyes of God. They think they have this all sewn up, and tout their credentials in a failed attempt to prove it, but God's wisdom is supreme. God, in His infinite wisdom, has given U/us free will and then stood back and allowed U/us to make the choice. To follow the road that leads to salvation or that which leads to destruction. The posts on this board stand testimony to which road those people have chosen to follow. The ones that have chosen destruction, then, are not really qualified to speak on this matter. They can not even speak for themselves. How can they turn around and speak for God?

God allows disasters to happen. He does not cause them. Science causes them. However, through those disasters emerge stories of human triumphs. Of sacrifices. Of testimonies of the good will of man. Out of every single disaster in human history emerges the story of human goodwill towards their fellow man. This is where the works of stalwart Christians shine, and this is where the testimony and ministering begins.

THIS is why God allows, not causes, disasters to happen. To say God CAUSES disasters denies science and free will, and it does not take a BA in psychology to figure that one out.

< Message edited by SirKenin -- 7/15/2005 8:41:16 PM >


_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to onceburned)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 8:52:51 PM   
onceburned


Posts: 2117
Joined: 1/4/2005
From: Iowa
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dark~angel
Think, question and find your own belief and reason and it works for you and it's brilliant. Everything I write, is mine only. It's not for other people - just if someone asks for my view, then I will offer it.


Well said. The opinions we have all been offering are simply that - our personal opinions. I have found contentment in my own understanding. Emerald has found it in hers. And so on.

Its been interesting exchanging views - perhaps someone has gained from this discussion. I have noticed that we have tended to talk past one another. This is frustrating, but I suppose inevitable in something so highly personal as religion.

(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 9:06:09 PM   
imtempting


Posts: 1280
Joined: 2/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin


God allows disasters to happen. He does not cause them. Science causes them. However, through those disasters emerge stories of human triumphs. Of sacrifices. Of testimonies of the good will of man. Out of every single disaster in human history emerges the story of human goodwill towards their fellow man. This is where the works of stalwart Christians shine, and this is where the testimony and ministering begins.

THIS is why God allows, not causes, disasters to happen. To say God CAUSES disasters denies science and free will, and it does not take a BA in psychology to figure that one out.


Ok so science was the cause a meteorite killed the dinosaures? Or did God not create dinosaures?? Science 'cause some destruction but if you do not like science then go back to writing on stone stablets with stone age tools as sciene has created computers,paper aswell as many other things. Science has caused much destruction but without sceince the pop would not even be able to travel around the world. If you don't like or approve off science move in with the Amish.





< Message edited by imtempting -- 7/15/2005 9:08:11 PM >

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 10:47:12 PM   
EmeraldSlave2


Posts: 3645
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

And that's called argumentum ad verecundiam. Maybe they covered that in your philosophy coursework. Normally I agree with you, and generally I agree with what you're saying on this thread, but it really does not matter to your argument whether you have a B.A. in philosophy.

Lam


But I haven't given MY argument for anything, and I only just barely expressed how this entire issue isn't something relevant to me. As I said, I've only reiterated, re-stated and summarized things that have been said and pondered by far wiser ones before me. I've just been lucky to be able to study under the teachings of some great people in more depth than most.

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 10:49:58 PM   
EmeraldSlave2


Posts: 3645
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin
To say God CAUSES disasters denies science and free will, and it does not take a BA in psychology to figure that one out.

BA in philosophy, the minor was psychology.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/15/2005 11:09:50 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
At least that's a more honest answer than what most people give.

Why do you believe? Unlike a lot of people who talk about God, I'm not trying to get you to abandon your faith or see things my way. Actually, I'm trying to understand how to see things YOUR way. I still don't get it, but I find it interesting that you believe even though you take the problems I mentioned seriously. Most people I know who believe in God just try to dismiss all the problems.

Lam

quote:

ORIGINAL: kisshou

This was answered, the answer is 'I don't know'.

I could propose alot of theories though (is that what you want?)


(in reply to kisshou)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/16/2005 3:21:18 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

I can't help noticing that no one has responded to this, and I'm honestly curious to know how a serious believer would answer these questions, because whenever I get into a discussion with someone about God, the communication ends at this juncture. Generally one of three things happens:

A. I get no response.
B. I get a response that makes absolutely no sense. (For example, that human beings supposedly polluted the workings of the universe through their sinfulness, and that's why there are natural disasters today, though they did not exist in God's originally perfect creation. Of course, they had to have done this in a time before time.)
C. The other person gets seriously pissed off and starts insulting me.

Can ANYONE try to explain to me how the other side sees this? How did mankind's sins succeed in disrupting God's creation? Why did the omnibenevolent God allow this to happen? Why should innocents suffer today because of other people's sins? And what on earth does free will have to do with a tsunami?

Lam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Kenin,

Two questions for you:

1. Why does an omnibenevolent God even ALLOW natural disasters?

2. How does free will cause earthquakes?




Greetings LaM

Sorry for not answering your 'two' questions. But I thought that the questions were directed to Kenin only, and I try not to jump into questions that seem directed to a specific person. However, I feel I did answer the second question already in one of the posts, not sure if you saw it?

LaM - you are working on the premise that God is benevolent in christianity. Whilst He is love, He is also righteous and in a sense - selfish. And jealous. And has all the feelings any person would when they are in love with someone. Just because He is all creating - doesn't mean that benevolency comes onto it. He also gave free will and it could be said that free will can cause earthquakes. But equally, as a christian I know that God will cause such - ie floods etc - if you exercise your free will in a bad way. Just like a father scolds a child or a Dominant punishes a sub. It's about the concpt, not so much the action.

I am not saying you will believe in it - or have to - thats what free choice is.

I really hope I don't sound all preachy - it's not my intention to convert, just explain and put over my thoughts.

Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/16/2005 3:35:03 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

This was answered, the answer is 'I don't know'.

I could propose alot of theories though (is that what you want?)


Exactly kissou -

'I don't know'

It's really such a simple thing to say, but many people( myself included) feel 'pressured' into knowing an answer because people like to know. That's where science comes in. On another discussion - anthro was talking about belief vs. theories. In reality - theres barely any difference. As a christian, I can give you a theory, but the proof is in the pudding as it were.

I think the hardest and most beautifully honest thing is to say 'I don't know'. And like you say - all these reasons given are options to the why. But to me, the reasons make no sense and really don't matter. What matters is that I show as much love to this 'God' I believe in and I am true to His teaching as I can be. I make mistakes, big ones. But I realise that the mistake would be mine.

I love the planet - I do all I can not to misuse it. I love people - because even the most cruel of people deserve that. I would never deny love to anyone - because love is something I know and has been uplifting and part of the most wonderful thing to me. And so I want to share all the love I have because its fucking fantsatic! Bit like some poly relationships I guess.

Love is all powerful and all consuming. Nothing can break it, not even death. OK, so I sound like a tree hugger, but damn I am proud to be a tree hugger.

Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to kisshou)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/16/2005 3:38:06 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

Actually, I'm trying to understand how to see things YOUR way. I still don't get it, but I find it interesting that you believe even though you take the problems I mentioned seriously.


LaM

I think that it's preety obvious your not trying to de-convert(is that a word????) anyone - just as kisshou isn't looking to convert. It's a sharing of ideas, which is why this thread is not just a bashing thread.

Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/16/2005 5:17:31 AM   
kisshou


Posts: 2425
Joined: 2/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Why do you believe?
Lam



I believe in God because I gain from believing. Believing in God provides alot of comfort and stucture in a very scary world.


(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/16/2005 8:44:56 AM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: imtempting

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin


God allows disasters to happen. He does not cause them. Science causes them. However, through those disasters emerge stories of human triumphs. Of sacrifices. Of testimonies of the good will of man. Out of every single disaster in human history emerges the story of human goodwill towards their fellow man. This is where the works of stalwart Christians shine, and this is where the testimony and ministering begins.

THIS is why God allows, not causes, disasters to happen. To say God CAUSES disasters denies science and free will, and it does not take a BA in psychology to figure that one out.


Ok so science was the cause a meteorite killed the dinosaures? Or did God not create dinosaures?? Science 'cause some destruction but if you do not like science then go back to writing on stone stablets with stone age tools as sciene has created computers,paper aswell as many other things. Science has caused much destruction but without sceince the pop would not even be able to travel around the world. If you don't like or approve off science move in with the Amish.






I have no problem with science. Science did kill off the dinosaurs too. I do not understand how you drew the conclusion that I do not like science? Science created this computer I am working on. What is there not to like about it?


_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to imtempting)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/16/2005 8:45:47 AM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2


quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin
To say God CAUSES disasters denies science and free will, and it does not take a BA in psychology to figure that one out.

BA in philosophy, the minor was psychology.


Oh ok, My error. Whatever.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/16/2005 5:05:01 PM   
imtempting


Posts: 1280
Joined: 2/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin



I have no problem with science. Science did kill off the dinosaurs too. I do not understand how you drew the conclusion that I do not like science? Science created this computer I am working on. What is there not to like about it?



How did science kill of the dinosaures? In your previous post you also stated God allows disasters to happen. He does not cause them. Science causes them. Well in that case an act of God or natural disaster does not exsist as its humans who made it. So therefore if God does not cause it how is there proove of God?

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/16/2005 8:08:47 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: imtempting

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin



I have no problem with science. Science did kill off the dinosaurs too. I do not understand how you drew the conclusion that I do not like science? Science created this computer I am working on. What is there not to like about it?



How did science kill of the dinosaures? In your previous post you also stated God allows disasters to happen. He does not cause them. Science causes them. Well in that case an act of God or natural disaster does not exsist as its humans who made it. So therefore if God does not cause it how is there proove of God?


Ummm. Humans do not create all science.. There are numerous forms of science, only some of them are manmade. Thus your logic is rather flawed.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to imtempting)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/16/2005 9:42:17 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Laughing...HIS logic is flawed?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

Ummm. Humans do not create all science.. There are numerous forms of science, only some of them are manmade. Thus your logic is rather flawed.


(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/17/2005 3:15:40 AM   
FirmFare


Posts: 48
Joined: 6/21/2005
Status: offline
I hope I'm not butting in, but think I can contribute to Lord and Master's honest request to understand why we believe. First I would like to describe where I am coming from so you may know 1. I am authentic and 2. perhaps you can attribute a new experience to self professed followers of God.

I am 45 years old and have been in a relationship with God for about 14 years. I don't profess to know all but I am speaking from a perspective of experience. I do not hold any degrees. I am not a scholar and never attended any colleges or seminaries. Over the 14 years I have tried to follow God, I have studied the subject of God's will to know better how to serve Him. About the most edgimacation I can lay claim to is a couple of trade schools since graduating from high school in 1979.

I am so glad you have expressed an honest interest in understanding the Christian's faith. I am sorry you've had such bad experiences in the past while seeking answers. I will make no excuses for bad behavior but please understand that people in the church are often immature, passionate, and ignorant of their own religion. This is most likely because they are either still fresh out of the secular mindset or are too preoccupied with other things to study it. I will try to respect you and be as honest and thorough with my responses as I can.

So, here goes. For me the topic isn't academic, but it is about my personal experience. What I've learned about God's creation is that it started out perfect. He gave free will to all of His intelligent creations. (Meaning angels and people) I don't know about the reasoning ability of other creations but of these two the Bible clearly attributes intelligent reasoning with God. I believe that is what it means to be created in God's image. When Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge, they were made aware of right and wrong. Not the specifics really, but knew a sense of dread in wrong doing. Obviously, they knew one specific, "God said, "You may not eat of the tree in the center of the Garden." By this act of defiance, they brought sin into the world. (Sin is anything done outside of faith) (Faith is believing and trusting God) The consequence of that act was curses. God cursed the snake and took away his limbs. God cursed the entire female gender with greatly increased pain during childbirth and with the menstuel cycle and with being under the authority of her man in His (God's) revised plan. God cursed the earth and made it produce thorns and thistle. " In toil you shall eat of it. By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread." Mankind would have to sweat to make a living. (Before that all they had to do was reach the nearest plant and find fruit on it that would sustain them. Then, during the flood, (another consequence of more sin) God caused the founts of the deep to break open. There's your earthquakes and volcanoes. That's when the seas and mountains were formed. At the tower of Babel, another consequence of sin. God confused the language so that people didn't understand one another.

My point here is that sin did cause earthquakes, God uses terrible events to show us how destructive sin is. Now, if you need to convince a child that he is doing something that will bring harm to him, you spank. But, if you want to convince generations that there is terrible consequences to their behavior, a personal spanking won't accomplish it. You need stories that will be heeded forever. Adam and Eve are the mother and father of us all. Their consequence fall on us all. The Bible also describes the whole earth groaning as a woman in the throes of childbirth. So what is more terrible than death that God is striving to protect us from? Eternal separation from Himself. This is hell. A popular proselytism slogan is "Everyone lives forever, one place or the other" We are eternal beings like God and the angels. When we die, we get incorruptable bodies. (Meaning we can't die again) So imagine living forever without any favor from God. No air, no food, no water, nothing. That's what He is trying to save us from. But, in order to maintain heaven as heaven when we get there, we can't be living outside of faith, outside of His will. Here we have some knowledge of the necessity of living by His guidelines. There, we will have full disclosure, but if our wills are against His will, we will corrupt heaven. Heaven would wind up just like earth. Wars, crime, sickness, and suffering. Let me specify here that freewill without the opportunity or ability to oppose God's will is not FREEWILL.

That's why there has to be a judgement day. That's why God had to make a way for the sinner to enter Heaven. Man is a very visually centered creature. So God started instructing His followers to sacrifice animals for their sins. So man would understand that their sins cause death. The sacrifice is a symbol of what will happen to the sinner when he doesn't hold on to faith. But man in his callous heart grew accustomed to sacrificing animals, till they meant nothing. The shock of bleeding an animal out all but wore off. So this was only a foreshadowing of the sacrifice to come. These were only temporary fixes for the problem of sin. This is why God sacrificed Himself in a manner of speaking. Only a sinless Man could pay for the sins of others. But there were no sinless people, much less one that was willing to die in there stead. To suffer the all the consequences of others' actions.

This is where it gets tricky. The stumbling block of trying to comprehend (wrapping our minds around) the concept of God. God came to earth as a sinless man to pay that price Himself. Now come all the questions nobody can answer sufficeintly. If God was on earth, Who did Jesus pray to? etc., etc.,

SirKenin stated a great point. The purpose of our relationship with God is consentual love. Thus far, everything I've presented is motivation for selfish concerns. But the original design was for mutual love between God and man. So, when we come to a relaionship with the Living God, we begin to experience this love in that relationship. In fact, this relationship is compared with the Jewish traditional marriage. So, when we come into what Christians call "The saving knowledge of God" we are engaged to God. In Jewish tradition the engagement last for about one year during which time the groom goes and prepares a place for them to live. (Builds a house usually) Then, one day without warning the groom comes to collect his bride and take her home. This second coming is what we are waiting for. In the meantime, we have been given a Comforter, the Holy Spirit, a.k.a. the Wonderful Counselor. A true believer senses God's presence and communicates with Him. He can pray, and he can 'hear' God. Not necessarily audibly, but in some form of comprehension. Newbie Christians can confuse their own wills with this comprehension. So, there is much debate about authenticity of present work of the Holy Spirit. One denomination says the Holy Spirit doesn't speak anymore, another says every feeling they get is from the Holy Spirit. All I know is, if I allow Him to guide me, I can see actual miracles take place through my hands, voice, whatever.

On the subject of miracles, God intervenes in some and not others because of the heart of the individual He wants to bless. Not because of some cosmic dice roll. There is purpose in everything He does. I don't always get it, but I know His heart. He is for us, not against us. However, if you set your heart against Him, you make yourself an enemy to His will, you make yourself His enemy. He doesn't reward poeple for setting themselves against His will. The Bible says, "If you seek Him with all your heart, you will find Him."

Now, to why good people suffer. And let me add another, why bad people seem to prosper for being bad. These seem to go together. Let me start with the second one first. The Bible says sin can seem good for a season, but in the end it brings death. So, from our flash picture perspective it does seem like sin can profit. But nobody gets into heaven by force. It is God's will that all of us get into heaven, but not at the cost of corrupting heaven.

I don't know the answer to the other. I can conjecture some, but my answers seem inadequate in my own ears. I will share my conjectures with you none the less. I don't remember who it was but somebody here made a great point about an aunt who'd asked God to heal her but eventually accepted her lot and used it to witness and minister to others who suffered. Paul is another case. He was, of all the writers of the Bible, the most successful missionary, proselyte, recruiter, pastor, etc., Yet he suffered constantly with something he called a thorn in his side. He asked repeatedly for God to heal him and was finally told, "NO." He attributed his illness with keeping him humble so that he was better able to accomplish the task set before him. He also was stoned twice for his efforts, was lost at sea twice, flogged uncounted times, slandered, so on and so on, and eventually beheaded for his faith. If good people are really good, they will be examples of how to love God in every circumstance they fing themselves. This does not address the issues of why babies die or viruses wipe out large numbers or tsunamis strike certain parts of the world regularly, wars are common place in world events yearly. However, after each trajedy, more souls come to Christ than when all is well. So, I suspect that each and every event has a purpose. If nobody died until and unless they accepted His will, what would be the motive to submit to His will? 'cause you want to die?

Now, if God makes diseases and earthquakes and tornadoes, is God creating evil? Pesonally, I don't think we are in any position to judge God. For one thing, we don't see all the results of His work, for another, Satan is at work as His enemy trying to confuse us and kill any chances of our making it into heaven. One of his tactics is to claim God's work as his own and another is to claim his work is God's. He can't touch God even though he tried to take over God's creation. So, the worst thing he can do to God is hurt what God loves. Us. For God's part, He allows Satan to test us. How else will we be proven whether we are willing to live by His will or by our own? But Satan is not the king of hell. In hell, he will be like anyone else. Alone, suffering from lack of everything he needs to feel comfort. In that day, we will look at him and say, "Is this the one who terrorized the world for mellenia?" God does move the earth from time to time, but not every event is by His desire. In fact, most of the time He is acting to preserve us/earth from disasters. He is patient and He does view us as His children. Somewhere in this thread, Jonah was referenced. He was sent to Nineva to warn of impending disaster if they didn't change their ways. Does God warn everytime? No, I don't think so. I think He does whatever it takes for maximum soul harvest. (Meaning proselytism)

Finally, there are really only two rules in the Bible. Every other rule is derived from these two. 1. Love the Lord with all your heart, mind, and strength.
2. Love your neighbor as yourself.

If everyone on earth lived by these two rules, all the death and sickness would stop except for one thing. We still have an enemy out there doing everything he can to hurt us.

To summarize;
Creation=perfect Freewill=Opportunity to corrupt
Intervention=Purposeful restoration of consentual relationship

I hope this is helpful to both the debate and to LaM honest request.
Bob

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/17/2005 9:08:10 AM   
ScooterTrash


Posts: 1407
Joined: 1/24/2005
From: Indiana
Status: offline
Interesting post, especially after having read the "casual" (lol) banter. I'm thinking the term "Acts of God" may have just been a handy caption for natural occurances based on our environment, not necessarily something an actual entity (fill in your choice here) does. Kind of a case of having to blame someone for it, so let's pick on the same one being credited with creation.

But...going to even a more basic interpretation and pitching the commandment out. How about taking the commandment itself literally and saying it can not be followed at all and us survive. Kill, murder, whatever..is the taking of life. To survive, we must eat, to eat, we must kill. Whether it is killing an animal or the taking of fruit from the vine (I guess this is vegatative abortion) it is an act of taking life to sustain our own. No kill, no humans (or animals). Not sure (probably wrong here) but I think the plants may get away with hanging in there. So realistically, the "law" get's thrown out as not possible to follow. So if this reasoning holds water and the commandment is repealed, now...the "Act of God" violates nothing.

Disclaimer; Just a logical thought..not trying to rain on anyone's parade or faith here.


_____________________________

Formal symbolic representation of qualitative entities is doomed to its rightful place of minor significance in a world where flowers and beautiful women abound.
-Albert Einstein

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/17/2005 10:48:38 AM   
perverseangelic


Posts: 2625
Joined: 2/2/2004
From: Davis, Ca
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin
What these people that profess to be so smart do not understand, or can not understand, is that all things work together for good. There is a very good reason for miracles and the lack thereof. God uses people's trials and tribulations for the good of themselves and for the greater good.



Ok, a couple things.
1. Person A is dying of cancer. Person A is suffering imaginable pain and unhappyness. Person A dies. The family of person A learns a huge amount from the suffering of person A and becomes better people from person A's death.

Well, what about person A? She's still dead. She still suffered.

I've heared it argued that God cannot prevent all suffering, because we would just create more. Ok. I'm down with that and agree. However, why wouldnt' God prevent SOME suffering. Surely God can at least get rid of some of it. Wouldn't an omnibenevolent being want to remove at least some of the suffering from the world?

I've heared it argued that we cannot know what God would do because we can only view God from a human perspective. Ok. However, what other perspective do we have?

We cannot have any perspective -but- a human perspective. Because we cannot have another perspective, we can only understand from a human one, and it is justifiable to judge from a human perspective. Were we able to judge from God's perspective, we would, perhaps, come to a different conclution, however, as we cannot I don't see that God can blame us for working within' the framework God gave us.

Afterall, God created us (nominally) with the brain we've got. Why would God create us with that brain if he didn't intend us to use it and use the perspective it gives us? So, because I have been created witha brain that gievs me a human perspective, because God has given me a brain that only hsa this perspective, I can make judgements from this perspective with the knowledge that it was the perspective God -wanted- me to have. If God wanted me to see things differently, God would have given me a different brain. It is justified, then, to judge from a human perspective because that is as God intended.

So, from the human perspective which God gave me, much of the suffering in the world could be prevented by God without interfearing with free will. God is omnipotent. He could stop natural disasters without altering human's abiliyt to choose their own fate. As I see it, that means that he must NOT be omnibenevolent, because he obviously doen't care enough to remove that suffering from the world.

Re: Science.
"sci·ence
1. The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena."

Science is a way of knowing. It is -not- the way things are.

As such ALL science is manmade. "Science" is human-invented disiplines designed to explain the function of the world in a way that humans understand. While the laws of physics would still exist were the study of physics not around, it wouldn't be science. It would be "stuff that happened." -Science- is the rules we have placed on things to translate them into human conception. It isn't the things that happen. For example, it's the gravitational constant, but NOT gravity. It's the number of years that compose the half life of a radioactive element, but -not- the half-life itself. Numbering the years and naming hte element is science. The existence of the element and the fact that it decays is not.

Humans created science, sure, but God created the stuff that IS science. We created the way to understand it, God created the stuff that we understand. We invented the microscope that lets us see the atom. God created the atom.

Human technology can cause natural disasters. Science can't. Science isn't something that acts. Rather, it is a methodology for learning to create/explain/understand. Science can no more cause huricanes that it could cause the gravitational constant to change. It -can- teach humans how to make techonology that can cause natural disasters. However, unless there's been some huge breakthrough I don't know about, the closest we've gotten so far is seeding clouds for rain.

Science CANNOT have killed the dinosaurs. It -can- help us learn what happened to them.

Too, again, God has the power to make it go away. If God didn't want it to exist, it wouldn't. Even taking free will into account, there is so much suffering that is 100% preventable by an omnipotent being, it's hard to believe that if there is one he/she actually cares about us at all.




(ehhehehehe. It's really nice to see all the traditional anti-diest arguments get presented here so well. I finished up my intro to philos class last quarter and am being highly amused)

_____________________________

~in the begining it is always dark~

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: "Acts of God" Riddle - 7/17/2005 10:52:20 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
The Bible says this:

"Fathers shall not be put to death for their sons, nor shall sons be put to death for their fathers; everyone shall be put to death for his own sin." (Deut. 24:16)

And this:

"The person who sins will die. The son will not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son’s iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself." (Ezek. 18:20)

Why would a God who announces that people are not to be punished for the sins of their father's go around (randomly) punishing the descendants of Adam and Eve? It really makes no sense to me whatsoever.

I also cannot imagine what lessons about sin all the infants supposedly learned when they were destroyed by the tsunami. That's not a great way to teach.

Obviously, no one is going to convince anyone else in this discussion, and my main interest was to learn more about how theists think. So I'm not trying to convince you or belittle you; in fact, I appreciate your long and honest answer. But I still can't even begin to see the reasoning.

Lam

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmFare

My point here is that sin did cause earthquakes, God uses terrible events to show us how destructive sin is. Now, if you need to convince a child that he is doing something that will bring harm to him, you spank. But, if you want to convince generations that there is terrible consequences to their behavior, a personal spanking won't accomplish it. You need stories that will be heeded forever. Adam and Eve are the mother and father of us all. Their consequence fall on us all.


(in reply to FirmFare)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "Acts of God" Riddle Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.133