RE: Conflicted - PLEASE help! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive



Message


crazyml -> RE: Conflicted - PLEASE help! (6/28/2014 7:22:52 AM)

Thanks!

And yes.. I agree with you, ultimately it's the OP's choice to make.





crazyml -> RE: Conflicted - PLEASE help! (6/28/2014 7:26:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: InHisHeart


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Let me tell you a super secret about men. They don't know what they want when it comes to marriage and kids, for certain. One day we will be for it and one day not.


You can speak for all men?



Not that you're actually in any doubt, I can confirm that he cannot speak for me.




crazyml -> RE: Conflicted - PLEASE help! (6/28/2014 7:32:21 AM)

Thanks!




Domnotlooking -> RE: Conflicted - PLEASE help! (6/28/2014 8:27:45 AM)

If you're putting your christian identity out there front and center -partic. the no premarital sex part- the guys who go for you (who aren't likeminded) have some mental problems or ethical issues. They know it's not workable, they just hope to wear you down and get into your pants.

You could use some self-reflection too. Why do you keep chasing these intractable dramas?

For me, it would be a short discussion:

"I love the lord and will never blow you without a wedding. Also, I want to have kids. Soon".

"Have a great life and the next time you pray one, say one for me".




Kirata -> RE: Conflicted - PLEASE help! (6/28/2014 8:32:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

So when people start paraphrasing or quoting specific bits in arguing the toss over certain meanings of text, it becomes a pissing contest of who's version is the one twue way to follow it.

The OP's conflict centers on a moral belief based on the NT. It may be, in your view, that the "one twue way" to respond to her conflict is to completely ignore the text. But others disagree, and this is the second time you've gone in for a bit of pissing yourself.

Granting the many differences among Christian sects, none hold favorable views on pre-marital sex. And countering an argument to the contrary based on factual claims that are demonstrably false cannot be dismissed as merely a difference of interpretation.

K.




LafayetteLady -> RE: Conflicted - PLEASE help! (6/28/2014 12:36:27 PM)

Most people really lack knowledge of religion beyond their own. Kirata is correct that NO Christian faith supports premarital sex.

Here's the thing, Christianity applies to any religion who believes Jesus was the Son of God. Commonly, Christianity has two categories, Catholic and Protestant. However, Protestant is NOT a religion, it simply denotes a Christian who is not Catholic. So Episcopalian, Pentacostal, Baptist, Evangelical, Methodist, Charismatic, et al are ALL Prrotestantt faiths, as they belivie Jesus is the Son of God.

To say Christians only follow the words of Christ is misleading at best, since the NT includes much more than just the words of Jesus Christ. If that was all it was, their Bible would be less than 50 pages, probably less than 2t. Like most things, without knowing the history and back story, it would make little sense.

I have never seen any organized religion who has completely abdondoned the OT and followed only the NT. REGARDLESS, as I said before, the concept that because it is "just sex" and a decision the OP is making based on her faith making it something that should be dismissed by interpretaion is something no one with. An once of self respect would ever do. Suggesting such is nothing more than spinning something (or trying to) to get your way.

To say such things and then think you can pass yourself off as a dominant worthy of anyone's respect is laughable and does more than any of a thousand other posts to scream, "I am a narcissistic, ignorant ass hat."

Finally, as I said before, if the OP'S question was not about pre marital sex, but that potentail domininant's view that all s-types he is involved with must engage in scat or being turned out for gang bangs, this theological discussion would not happen, but more so, I doubt anyone would be trying to convince the OP that she should compromise her limits for this potential dominant.

So for any who can't seem to tell the difference, thank you for showing the whole population of this site who you truly are, so everyone can make informed choices.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0546875