RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Sanity -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 12:53:39 PM)


You like polls?

Heres one for you

Our narcissist-in-chief recently bragged that he could easily win a third term...

quote:

Poll: No, Mr. President, you would not win a third term

It seems that Americans can add "no more Obamas" to the oft-heard calls for no more Bushes or Clintons, despite the president's belief that he would be a shoo-in for a third term.

Rasmussen Reports on Friday released a poll showing that just one third of likely U.S voters would keep President Obama in office if he ran again. Even among Democrats, only 57 percent would vote for him a third time...




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 12:55:53 PM)

The poll is a Rasmussen reports poll, which in the common parlance is as accurate as socks on a rooster, a meaningless bit of rightwing slobbering hysterical worthless masturbation.

Even feebleminded rightwingers dont quote rasmussen as a real source.




Musicmystery -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 2:31:46 PM)

Since a third term isn't an option, who the fuck cares?

Bush Lite will take his place in history, like 43 presidents before him.

Next.




Sanity -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 3:04:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Since a third term isn't an option, who the fuck cares?


Our narcissist-in-chief cares, obviously:

Obama: I could win third term if I ran - CNNPolitics.com

If you dont care, why go to the trouble of typing out a reply. People come here to discuss politics (this is the political section of a discussion board, btw) and things that politicians say are a normal topic of conversation here

Just fyi




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 3:13:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

Sanity I like, I realllllllly like that she is stumbling. I do have the following observations tho

Hillary
a. Her e-mails are going to haunt her until she decides to quit politics or dies, whichever comes first.
b. "What difference does it make now?" will continue haunting her as well.

Republican field
a. Could split the party, especially if someone goes off and runs as an independent
b. I seriously don't think the establishment will allow Trump to win. Once the delegates vote as their state has required (which I think is the first vote only) the establishment will pick whomever they want (whomever the establishment wants).

Hillary is from Illinois, she may be voting for another century.




Musicmystery -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 3:17:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Since a third term isn't an option, who the fuck cares?


Our narcissist-in-chief cares, obviously:

Obama: I could win third term if I ran - CNNPolitics.com

If you dont care, why go to the trouble of typing out a reply. People come here to discuss politics (this is the political section of a discussion board, btw) and things that politicians say are a normal topic of conversation here

Just fyi

Well, you go ahead and discuss it.

Meanwhile, Obama won't win in 2016 because he won't be running.

President Sanders.




Sanity -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 3:34:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Since a third term isn't an option, who the fuck cares?


Our narcissist-in-chief cares, obviously:

Obama: I could win third term if I ran - CNNPolitics.com

If you dont care, why go to the trouble of typing out a reply. People come here to discuss politics (this is the political section of a discussion board, btw) and things that politicians say are a normal topic of conversation here

Just fyi

Well, you go ahead and discuss it.

Meanwhile, Obama won't win in 2016 because he won't be running.

President Sanders.


Here you are responding yet again... [:D]




Musicmystery -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 3:42:51 PM)

And you. Without saying anything.

Good luck with Trump. You will need it. Especially running against Obama.

[8|]




Sanity -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 3:59:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

And you. Without saying anything.

Good luck with Trump. You will need it. Especially running against Obama.

[8|]


There is no such thing as luck.

Barack burned a lot of bridges Grubering us like he thinks America and even the rest of the world is too stupid to keep up with his lies and other stupidity

Theres a lot of anger even among Democrats toward the status quo, which would include Hillary and jeb Bush

So we shall see




Musicmystery -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 4:34:58 PM)

Yeah. Cost him his third term too!

[:D]

As for the anger . . . President Sanders.




KenDckey -> RE: Hillary Probed (7/31/2015 5:43:06 PM)

Isn't the count up to like 5 different pieces of classified information released out of a sample of 40? wonder what Justice is going to do now?




Moderator3 -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/1/2015 2:48:27 PM)

Fletchers with wet assholes attributed to anyone as an insult is not acceptable.

I have removed one post.




Arturas -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/1/2015 2:59:38 PM)

I heard in time of war or national emergency the elections can be legally postponed.




Arturas -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/1/2015 3:03:42 PM)

I really cannot believe Hillary, may I call you Hillary please, that Hillary would do anything wrong. She was a great Senator and a great something else, she ran the Benghazi Embassy thingie and did a great job, she is a Youtube fan and I am also, so we see eye to eye on pantsuits also. I don't think she has been probed for a long while but I could be wrong about that.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/1/2015 4:25:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

I heard in time of war or national emergency the elections can be legally postponed.

Even the Civil War wasn't a big enough national emergency.




Sanity -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/3/2015 7:48:38 PM)


NPR is piling on now. Or maybe theyre trying to help? its hard to tell at this point:

quote:

Meet Hillary Clinton — Again

[img]http://media.npr.org/assets/img/2015/08/02/ap_369346156348_wide-3c6b2be825ec1ec84f6551c45215df52ab916fa8-s800-c85.jpg[/img]


http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/08/02/428790911/meet-hillary-clinton-again






KenDckey -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/4/2015 7:05:14 AM)

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Huma-Outside-Employment-Complaint.pdf


Judicial Watch request to reopen FOIA case with state

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Court-Order-State-Department-013631.pdf

Judge orders State to do provide information.



Me Seems Judicial Watch is the driver against Hillary more than anyone else.




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/4/2015 9:24:03 AM)

Try looking up the number they have brought and the their successes.
Or even who they have covered....theres a reason




KenDckey -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/4/2015 11:28:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Try looking up the number they have brought and the their successes.
Or even who they have covered....theres a reason


Seems like they go after just about everyone. Since they were organized in 1994, the total number of suits seems to favor them going after more democratic administrations but during that time seems like the number of years for democratic administrations is double the number of republican administrations (more or less). Is that what you are referring to?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch




Sanity -> RE: Hillary Probed (8/4/2015 11:29:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Huma-Outside-Employment-Complaint.pdf


Judicial Watch request to reopen FOIA case with state

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Court-Order-State-Department-013631.pdf

Judge orders State to do provide information.



Me Seems Judicial Watch is the driver against Hillary more than anyone else.



Its the laws, especially the laws that were enacted after Watergate, that are the driver against Hillary. Judicial Watch has every right to request those records and the Obama Administration, whose core campaign promises meant openness and government we can believe in etc, has every obligation to provide those records in a timely manner

Instead they are all stonewalling.

Because they are hiding information, that they do not want American voters to have. Or perhaps its information they do not want those whose job it is to enforce our laws who they seek to keep in the dark?

Or likely both.







Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375