quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Damn, you and the whore prove youreslves to be non stop top shelf asstards.

"Oh yes I lived in the shower of directives. From the day I took over till the last day of the war....but the directive when I took over was the one that I wasn't to specifically aim at anything unless ordered to do so except to blast the German cities as a whole" ~Bomber Harris

Directives come from the people you work for, CHURCHILL and the BRITISH GUBMINT whose policy was to violate the all the international law to commit genocide in step with the zionist agenda.


Sir Arthur 'Bomber' Harris talks about Britains Dresden Holocaust


Now the rest of the world would call an interview with his admission evidence you would call it a cartoon, the only comedians here are you and the whore

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

British US and European Zionists started BOTH world wars. I posted the data long ago, all you can do is deny all data and spew the same bullshit about 6 million holocausted jews and you have not yet posted any damn thing but your propagandist rhetoric and denial of the facts.

Mayors, police chiefs, fire marshals, victims, and witnesses on the site suffering the event are not worthless drivel. Especially unlike your 6 million which has long since proven to be egg on your faces bullshit, the material evidence, well known refugee movements, churchill and eisenhowers illegal targetting of civilians all support their statements.


In the midst of winter with refugees pouring westwards and troops to be rested, roofs are at a premium. The intentions of the attack are to hit the enemy where he will feel it most, behind an already partially collapsed front, to prevent the use of the city in the way of further advance, and incidentally to show the Russians when they arrive what Bomber Command can do."

RAF January 1945


“There were no warning sirens. We were completely surprised and rushed back down to the cellars of the hospital. But these quickly became hopelessly overcrowded with people who could no longer find shelter in their own burning buildings. The crush was unbearable, we were so tight you could not fall over.”“Apart from the fire risk, it was becoming increasingly impossible to breath in the cellar because the air was being pulled out by the increasing strength of the blaze.”

“[Outside] We could not stand up, we were on all fours, crawling. the wind was full of sparks and carrying bits of blazing furniture, debris and burning bits of bodies.”

“There were charred bodies everywhere.”

“The experience of the bombing was far worse than being on the Russian front, where I was a front-line machine gunner.”

Rudolph Eichner



Your whole laughable offensive is simply to deny deny deny.

They wasted the refugees fleeing from the russians to dresden who were no longer able to fight and indiscrimnately targeted civilians and hospitals and personel carries with red crosses on them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

The idea that such a sizable force was deployed while no documentation of such a force of that size or disposition being deployed to the area exists in any military records should give you pause.

What's more - It doesn't matter what recon reports say - Bombing a School which intel states is occupied by Terrorist units is not an excuse when later you find out that it was actually filled with school children....

As such there is no documentation that any military unit was damaged or suffered losses as subject to the Wielun bombing, so even if there was intel to say that troops where there... when the bombs landed the place was devoid of any military presence.

So its ok for the asswipe brits to target civilians and indiscriminately bomb and burn german cities throughout the whole war but if a german didnt the bullseye of an intended target due to fog they are terrorists.

geebus fuck you are god damned hypocrite. you have the quotes from the historians, not my problem if they dont fit your propaganda, and to pretend nothing exists when you have not bothered to look and actually see if it exists is a lie. If you think the historians were wrong then become a revisionist and change understood history, but to come out here armed with lies and bullshit does not look very good for you, not that you give a damn.

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

The idea that such a sizable force was deployed while no documentation of such a force of that size or disposition being deployed to the area exists in any military records should give you pause.

What's more - It doesn't matter what recon reports say - Bombing a School which intel states is occupied by Terrorist units is not an excuse when later you find out that it was actually filled with school children....

As such there is no documentation that any military unit was damaged or suffered losses as subject to the Wielun bombing, so even if there was intel to say that troops where there... when the bombs landed the place was devoid of any military presence.

So its ok for the asswipe brits to target civilians and indiscriminately bomb and burn german cities throughout the whole war but if a german didnt the bullseye of an intended target due to fog they are terrorists.

geebus fuck you are god damned hypocrite. you have the quotes from the historians, not my problem if they dont fit your propaganda, and to pretend nothing exists when you have not bothered to look and actually see if it exists is a lie. If you think the historians were wrong then become a revisionist and change understood history, but to come out here armed with lies and bullshit does not look very good for you, not that you give a damn.

So you can't identify the specific Brigade, Division, or Battery that was apparently Stationed at Wielun...
Nor can you identify their strength, disposition, deployment, or even the armament of this force...

The only citation you can call upon speaks very vaguely of the matter as a whole... which is actually very weird.
Especially when you consider that it specifically points out the Infantry Regiment which manages to shoot down 4 of the Stukas... the Polish 36 Academic Legion Infantry Regiment... which was on the opposite side of the Warta River stationed closer to Radomsko. Kind of odd that they know the Regiment of troops that managed to down a couple of Stukas, yet seemingly cant identify the Brigade or Division which they just got done bombing.

but of course, rather then address this, you're going to mount personal attacks and call into question my accuracy because that is all you can do.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

The idea that such a sizable force was deployed while no documentation of such a force of that size or disposition being deployed to the area exists in any military records should give you pause.

What's more - It doesn't matter what recon reports say - Bombing a School which intel states is occupied by Terrorist units is not an excuse when later you find out that it was actually filled with school children....

As such there is no documentation that any military unit was damaged or suffered losses as subject to the Wielun bombing, so even if there was intel to say that troops where there... when the bombs landed the place was devoid of any military presence.

So its ok for the asswipe brits to target civilians and indiscriminately bomb and burn german cities throughout the whole war but if a german didnt the bullseye of an intended target due to fog they are terrorists.

geebus fuck you are god damned hypocrite. you have the quotes from the historians, not my problem if they dont fit your propaganda, and to pretend nothing exists when you have not bothered to look and actually see if it exists is a lie. If you think the historians were wrong then become a revisionist and change understood history, but to come out here armed with lies and bullshit does not look very good for you, not that you give a damn.

So you can't identify the specific Brigade, Division, or Battery that was apparently Stationed at Wielun...
Nor can you identify their strength, disposition, deployment, or even the armament of this force...

The only citation you can call upon speaks very vaguely of the matter as a whole... which is actually very weird.
Especially when you consider that it specifically points out the Infantry Regiment which manages to shoot down 4 of the Stukas... the Polish 36 Academic Legion Infantry Regiment... which was on the opposite side of the Warta River stationed closer to Radomsko. Kind of odd that they know the Regiment of troops that managed to down a couple of Stukas, yet seemingly cant identify the Brigade or Division which they just got done bombing.

but of course, rather then address this, you're going to mount personal attacks and call into question my accuracy because that is all you can do.

I quoted and referenced the historian, just as you do, you kids want to raise the level of evidence up a few notches fine, you first, I want hard evidence that anyone was gassed, surely someone came forward and confessed to be a jew gasser, lets see it and the corresponding corpus delicti

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

British US and European Zionists started BOTH world wars. I posted the data long ago, all you can do is deny all data and spew the same bullshit about 6 million holocausted jews and you have not yet posted any damn thing but your propagandist rhetoric and denial of the facts.

Mayors, police chiefs, fire marshals, victims, and witnesses on the site suffering the event are not worthless drivel. Especially unlike your 6 million which has long since proven to be egg on your faces bullshit, the material evidence, well known refugee movements, churchill and eisenhowers illegal targetting of civilians all support their statements.


In the midst of winter with refugees pouring westwards and troops to be rested, roofs are at a premium. The intentions of the attack are to hit the enemy where he will feel it most, behind an already partially collapsed front, to prevent the use of the city in the way of further advance, and incidentally to show the Russians when they arrive what Bomber Command can do."

RAF January 1945


“There were no warning sirens. We were completely surprised and rushed back down to the cellars of the hospital. But these quickly became hopelessly overcrowded with people who could no longer find shelter in their own burning buildings. The crush was unbearable, we were so tight you could not fall over.”“Apart from the fire risk, it was becoming increasingly impossible to breath in the cellar because the air was being pulled out by the increasing strength of the blaze.”

“[Outside] We could not stand up, we were on all fours, crawling. the wind was full of sparks and carrying bits of blazing furniture, debris and burning bits of bodies.”

“There were charred bodies everywhere.”

“The experience of the bombing was far worse than being on the Russian front, where I was a front-line machine gunner.”

Rudolph Eichner



Your whole laughable offensive is simply to deny deny deny.

They wasted the refugees fleeing from the russians to dresden who were no longer able to fight and indiscrimnately targeted civilians and hospitals and personel carries with red crosses on them.

Thank you for providing a perfect example of what I'm talking about when I refer to your alleged citations as bullshit that doesn't have any value as proof of anything except your guillibility and willingness to believe whatever you wish to believe without any hint of evidence to support your beliefs.
You provide no provenance for any of the content of quotation above, and no indication of when Eichman made the claim you're citing, and don't even have any evidence that he said what you're attributing to him.
It proves nothing, just like the rest of the "citations" you've spent this thread shitting out.
If you expect anybody else to provide a citation for anything, you have to do better than that, because that sort of nonsense neither proves anything you have to claim, nor rebuffs any statements that have been made by anybody else. It just makes you look like an idiot, a liar, or both.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

British US and European Zionists started BOTH world wars. I posted the data long ago, all you can do is deny all data and spew the same bullshit about 6 million holocausted jews and you have not yet posted any damn thing but your propagandist rhetoric and denial of the facts.

Mayors, police chiefs, fire marshals, victims, and witnesses on the site suffering the event are not worthless drivel. Especially unlike your 6 million which has long since proven to be egg on your faces bullshit, the material evidence, well known refugee movements, churchill and eisenhowers illegal targetting of civilians all support their statements.


In the midst of winter with refugees pouring westwards and troops to be rested, roofs are at a premium. The intentions of the attack are to hit the enemy where he will feel it most, behind an already partially collapsed front, to prevent the use of the city in the way of further advance, and incidentally to show the Russians when they arrive what Bomber Command can do."

RAF January 1945


“There were no warning sirens. We were completely surprised and rushed back down to the cellars of the hospital. But these quickly became hopelessly overcrowded with people who could no longer find shelter in their own burning buildings. The crush was unbearable, we were so tight you could not fall over.”“Apart from the fire risk, it was becoming increasingly impossible to breath in the cellar because the air was being pulled out by the increasing strength of the blaze.”

“[Outside] We could not stand up, we were on all fours, crawling. the wind was full of sparks and carrying bits of blazing furniture, debris and burning bits of bodies.”

“There were charred bodies everywhere.”

“The experience of the bombing was far worse than being on the Russian front, where I was a front-line machine gunner.”

Rudolph Eichner



Your whole laughable offensive is simply to deny deny deny.

They wasted the refugees fleeing from the russians to dresden who were no longer able to fight and indiscrimnately targeted civilians and hospitals and personel carries with red crosses on them.

Thank you for providing a perfect example of what I'm talking about when I refer to your alleged citations as bullshit that doesn't have any value as proof of anything except your guillibility and willingness to believe whatever you wish to believe without any hint of evidence to support your beliefs.
You provide no provenance for any of the content of quotation above, and no indication of when Eichman made the claim you're citing, and don't even have any evidence that he said what you're attributing to him.
It proves nothing, just like the rest of the "citations" you've spent this thread shitting out.
If you expect anybody else to provide a citation for anything, you have to do better than that, because that sort of nonsense neither proves anything you have to claim, nor rebuffs any statements that have been made by anybody else. It just makes you look like an idiot, a liar, or both.

Like with the disinfo man, you first surely someone came forward and confessed to be a jew gasser, lets see it, the transcripts, and the corresponding corpus delicti.

You havent posted anything but your always wrong opinion and exect me to raise the dead as your purported standard of proof which we both know would vaporize in denial to the next impossible level if I did raise the dead.

surely someone came forward and confessed to be a jew gasser, lets see it, the transcripts, and the corresponding corpus delicti.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Butch Harris was a catcher for the 1938 Sox. He would have been just shooting off his mouth.

Prove that Butch Harris was alive during WW2.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

The idea that such a sizable force was deployed while no documentation of such a force of that size or disposition being deployed to the area exists in any military records should give you pause.

What's more - It doesn't matter what recon reports say - Bombing a School which intel states is occupied by Terrorist units is not an excuse when later you find out that it was actually filled with school children....

As such there is no documentation that any military unit was damaged or suffered losses as subject to the Wielun bombing, so even if there was intel to say that troops where there... when the bombs landed the place was devoid of any military presence.

So its ok for the asswipe brits to target civilians and indiscriminately bomb and burn german cities throughout the whole war but if a german didnt the bullseye of an intended target due to fog they are terrorists.

geebus fuck you are god damned hypocrite. you have the quotes from the historians, not my problem if they dont fit your propaganda, and to pretend nothing exists when you have not bothered to look and actually see if it exists is a lie. If you think the historians were wrong then become a revisionist and change understood history, but to come out here armed with lies and bullshit does not look very good for you, not that you give a damn.

So you can't identify the specific Brigade, Division, or Battery that was apparently Stationed at Wielun...
Nor can you identify their strength, disposition, deployment, or even the armament of this force...

The only citation you can call upon speaks very vaguely of the matter as a whole... which is actually very weird.
Especially when you consider that it specifically points out the Infantry Regiment which manages to shoot down 4 of the Stukas... the Polish 36 Academic Legion Infantry Regiment... which was on the opposite side of the Warta River stationed closer to Radomsko. Kind of odd that they know the Regiment of troops that managed to down a couple of Stukas, yet seemingly cant identify the Brigade or Division which they just got done bombing.

but of course, rather then address this, you're going to mount personal attacks and call into question my accuracy because that is all you can do.

I quoted and referenced the historian, just as you do, you kids want to raise the level of evidence up a few notches fine, you first, I want hard evidence that anyone was gassed, surely someone came forward and confessed to be a jew gasser, lets see it and the corresponding corpus delicti

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan

The idea that such a sizable force was deployed while no documentation of such a force of that size or disposition being deployed to the area exists in any military records should give you pause.

What's more - It doesn't matter what recon reports say - Bombing a School which intel states is occupied by Terrorist units is not an excuse when later you find out that it was actually filled with school children....

As such there is no documentation that any military unit was damaged or suffered losses as subject to the Wielun bombing, so even if there was intel to say that troops where there... when the bombs landed the place was devoid of any military presence.

So its ok for the asswipe brits to target civilians and indiscriminately bomb and burn german cities throughout the whole war but if a german didnt the bullseye of an intended target due to fog they are terrorists.

geebus fuck you are god damned hypocrite. you have the quotes from the historians, not my problem if they dont fit your propaganda, and to pretend nothing exists when you have not bothered to look and actually see if it exists is a lie. If you think the historians were wrong then become a revisionist and change understood history, but to come out here armed with lies and bullshit does not look very good for you, not that you give a damn.

So you can't identify the specific Brigade, Division, or Battery that was apparently Stationed at Wielun...
Nor can you identify their strength, disposition, deployment, or even the armament of this force...

The only citation you can call upon speaks very vaguely of the matter as a whole... which is actually very weird.
Especially when you consider that it specifically points out the Infantry Regiment which manages to shoot down 4 of the Stukas... the Polish 36 Academic Legion Infantry Regiment... which was on the opposite side of the Warta River stationed closer to Radomsko. Kind of odd that they know the Regiment of troops that managed to down a couple of Stukas, yet seemingly cant identify the Brigade or Division which they just got done bombing.

but of course, rather then address this, you're going to mount personal attacks and call into question my accuracy because that is all you can do.

I quoted and referenced the historian, just as you do, you kids want to raise the level of evidence up a few notches fine, you first, I want hard evidence that anyone was gassed, surely someone came forward and confessed to be a jew gasser, lets see it and the corresponding corpus delicti

that is not how this works - you cannot barter for information when the legitimacy of your citations are brought into question. Trying to redirect or deflect critical analysis of your statements doesn't work. You made a Claim with a dubious citation... that citation has been questioned - so either provide clarification, or submit that the citation and statement you've made is not correct.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


so then you barter for information and accuse me of doing what you just did? Now thats wack!

You claimed that hitler drew dirst blood by targeting innocent civilians, that Wielun was not a military target, I checked my sources and they said it was in fact a military target and due to heavy fog a few pilots missed their targets.

So while you may have interesting questions they are for you to research if you wish to launch a counter offensive against my sources.

However you are wack if you think that its up to me to prove your point for you. That is not the way it works.

Get off your ass and do some research and when/if you ever have a bonafide counter offensive that actually contradicts rather than doubts hit me up with what you find. Until then the historians who reviewed the matter that I posted stands.

Wielun was a bonafide military target.

and that is how it works.