Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 8:18:26 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Greta75
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Cite please.



I am not citing what I see everyday in Malaysia and Singapore and even in Indonesia.


as usual nothing to back up your very shallow lies.


They all wear make up and wear high heels.
If you don't believe, go travel to a Muslim country and see for yourself.

So ,according to you, they are not real muslims and the men will kill them. But waite if you see them and the men have not killed them how is it that the muslims run that third world shithole called singapore as you claim?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.


But you can read about Saudi women here. There is even National geographic documentary on this! Showing the behind the scene and it's exactly as this person describes.

https://www.esl101.com/blogs/fashion-saudi-arabia#.WLL32jjuq5w

The Saudi women dress to impress…and by that I mean impress other women because men aren’t seeing them.

Jesus you are phoquing stupid


Here I am proving to you that Saudi women wear make up. And here you are all denying things in the face of the truth. Who is the liar? You.
Men can't see their make up because they cover their face infront of men. But they do not need to cover themselves infront of fellow women. So only women get to see their make up. But they have make up on ALL THE TIME!

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 8:28:01 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

And while we're on the subject of reality, what is with this "killing weapon" shit? Firearms are designed to wound. A fatal wound depends on shot placement and luck. If guns were really designed to kill, they would be the engineering laughing stock of the century.

Enlarged and quoted so you can't hide from having said this later.

So now you're implying that I would? I guess that's your mind-reading superpowers at work. But it isn't very nice to hide the evidence for a position that you want to trash by trimming the quote to make its supporting documentation disappear. People will notice, and your mommy won't appreciate her dishonest little twerp running around online embarrassing her. You do want her let you out of the basement again, don't you?

K.



(in reply to GaryWilcox)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 8:28:17 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
Of all the people I visited in the US, even if they had more than one toilet, it wasn't a his'n'hers separate set of toilets.
The vast majority of homes here only have one toilet.
So in that sense, pretty much most toilets, except those in public places/buildings, are unisex toilets.
Why Greta seems to think those with more than one toilet in their home are separate for the sexes is very bizarre.


I've been in houses where the wife and husband have their own bathroom and a separate one for guests. And while they most of the people I know don't do this, obviously that doesn't mean no one does. Also a lot of my friends wish they had the money and the space to do this but can't. Now I can't speak for bathrooms over there so I will have to take your word that most houses only have one, but it makes me feel bad for you blokes. You must spend a lot of time with your knees pressed together praying you get there in time.


I didn't claim they didn't exist; just that of all those people that I met over there (mainly in NC and FL), none of them had separate his'n'hers toilets even when they had 3 and more bathrooms in their houses.

I was commenting more on Greta's rather naive claim: "...So it's apparently quite common to have separate bathrooms in their homes for straight married couples at the very least."

I do know that there are quite a high proportion of houses in the US have more than one bathroom/toilet.
I guess that's because you have the room to build bigger houses with more facilities than we have here.

As an example, my friend in Jax (FL) has a rather large two-bedroomed single-storey house on a small housing complex that he calls "cramped" because he can throw a baseball into his neighbours back yard.
In his place he has a bathroom/toilet and a shower-room/toilet as well as an en-suite to the master bedroom.
Where I live here, you could fit at least six houses in his back yard and three more across his frontage.
His walk-in closet is bigger than the whole footprint of our house!!

I showed him where we are on Google maps and he almost fainted with shock.
Then I enlightened him to the fact that the roof he was looking at was actually four houses in a terrace - he went very very pale.

Most of our 1, 2, and 3 bedroomed homes really have only one bathroom/toilet.
There are some older ones that still have the outside one that was left when they built the indoor one; but they are not common.

And to be honest, unless they actually build a new building with the facility of a third restroom for trans people, most of our public buildings couldn't be converted to accommodate a third one.
I've been in many buildings (like some of our very old courtrooms and historic buildings) where the gents toilet was nothing more than a urinal in the corner and a single very narrow stall.
You couldn't even convert it to two stalls as per Greta's suggestion - there just isn't the room to do so.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 9:11:08 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko
FR

Not that it matters (because I know that one person's experience doesn't make the argument) but for the record, I was sexually assaulted as a young minor in a bathroom by a strange man who came in after me. I was much too young, paralyzed by what he was doing, frozen, and not able to react; not mature and confident enough to react. No one will ever convince me that this isn't a real risk.

The rest of the discussion aside, I do want to say that I am so sorry this happened to you.

quote:

But that's not why it sits wrong with me. I suppose you could say that I feel....offended that someone who is clearly not a woman feels they can take some pills, get some plastic surgery, and put on a dress and call themselves a woman. I feel like that diminishes women to the point of objectification, and that someone who does these things is making a mockery of womanhood.


I have no doubt that there are some people who are genuinely suffering in this way with their gender identity. I do not accept that they are the high numbers of people that we believe or accept them to be. I don't believe that nature has gone quite that amok.

For this, I have to ask, do you feel the same about intersexed people?

HB2 is very specific about using the bathroom that corresponds with the gender listed on a person's birth certificate. Basically, this means that every intersexed person who had to deal with a doctor's best guess at birth is stuck with that gender, even if, as they grow up, they identify more as the other.

Does it matter if there are high numbers of these people or is it ok for us to make this even more difficult on them because not that many makes them inconsequential? Is there any other birth defect out there that we would say you don't matter since there's just not that many of you?

quote:

I posted this awhile back in a different transgender thread and got no real responses. I think it's worth re-posting here. Maybe someone can enlighten me.

Original Post:

I am a woman. However, my long hair, the size of my breasts, whether I've had children or not, wearing makeup, working in a certain field, looking pretty....these things don't define me as a woman. Correct? I mean, if I were to lose my breasts through mastectomy, I would still be a woman. And if I were to cut my hair short and wear flannel shirts and hiking boots, I am still a woman. While I may not be able to answer to anyone's satisfaction what does define me a woman, I'm going to go on the assumption that we can all agree that any one of these things does not define me as a woman.

So, if I were a man but felt mismatched with that and felt like I more accurately identified as a woman, why is it that the outward changes I make in order to fit in as a woman in society are those very things that actually don't define someone as a woman?

Maybe I'm wrong, here. (Could very well be. I can count on one finger the number of transgender persons I know - that I'm aware of, anyway.) Do transgender persons try to assimilate into society by changing their outward appearance? If I'm correct in assuming so, then what does that get them? Our society already allows us to sleep with whomever we like, so he doesn't have to dress as a woman to be with a man. What other internal motivation would there be that doesn't rely on stereotypes of outward appearance and behavior?

And it often crosses my mind to wonder, if my assumptions are all correct: why is it okay to encourage using physical stereotypes as a way to express gender for our transgender folk, but it's frowned upon for those of us who aren't? An example of what I mean: It would be inappropriate for me to push my breasts up to an unnatural extent in order to, I don't know, go to a job interview. My breasts aren't who I am, and if I tried to make my appearance all about my breasts, then I would not be taken seriously. But if I'm a man who identifies as a woman, then somehow it's appropriate for me to...push my "breasts" up to an unnatural extent in order to go to a job interview. In that case, we'd be all "You go, girl!" but what's happening is that person is making their appearance all about their breasts - their physical femaleness* - but yet, they are taken seriously.

Just some thoughts....

*not quite sure that's a word. :)


Mind if I take a stab at it?

(And, please, don't take me as the authority on this stuff. I'm just like anybody else trying to learn along the way.)

One thing that jumps out at me about this is, even though you don't specifically link any of your physical attributes as being what makes you a woman, you are also fortunate enough (as most of us are) not to have any attributes/body parts that contradict your identity as a woman. You're a woman who was born in a woman's body, who has has the right chromosomes and (hopefully) hormone balance that fit into that gender identity.

What if you didn't? Had you, for whatever reason, been born with different genitalia, but still felt exactly like you do now, as a woman, would you think you'd feel like a male, just because you had a penis? Everything about you, except that penis, screams "woman" to you. Well, now what? You're in the wrong body. You're trapped and there's no way for you to get out.

You said something really neat that I wanted to comment on, because you specifically mentioned things like your hair and your breasts. (I'm sure people are just going to love the crap out of me for this.) Those two 'appearance' things are just devastating to female cancer patients. Yes, they learn to deal with it. However, many still go through such an emotional upheaval because they loose attributes that are intimately tied to society's interpretation as female. Same thing happens to men with testicular cancer who have to have one or both of their testicles removed. People run a number on themselves over it. I have to say, just in my experience with talking to people about this kind of thing, it's got a different slant to it as opposed to, for example, people who have had to have a limb amputated. It's not just about having lost a piece of your body so that you feel less "whole" because that's hard enough on it's own. Those 'gender' parts of your body that you've always had, and are in some way, wrapped up in the gender identity that you know you are, it's a hard blow to lose them. We are a society that still thinks body parts = gender.

Somebody can help me out on this one with a good link. You might feel that if you 'push up' your breasts or wear a low cut top to an interview means that you won't be taken seriously. Yet, studies show that two women walking in for a job with the same qualifications, the deciding factor of who gets the job will be based on which is the more attractive. This is something I've experienced, myself. I went back to work about six months ago. The gal who greeted me at the front went to get the person I was interviewing with. While it was completely unprofessional, I overheard her say, "gosh, she's pretty." (Which, I'm not. I look like most people's grandmothers.) Right then, I knew I had the job.

Which, btw, up until December, one of my fellow employees was a trans* man. Why I picked up on this rather than anybody else who hadn't seen his documentation, proving he was legal to work, I couldn't say. Maybe it was because I've got some experience with being familiar with trans* persons in out kink communities. I don't know. However, after he left the job, I had fifty co-workers who exclaimed in surprise, "Ray was a woman?" They had no idea that Ray had tits or that his driver's license said female.

This is my opinion, only. Yes, I do think that most trans* folk just want to assimilate into society. They aren't screaming at everybody that they were born with the wrong bits or trying to be noticed in some way. Mostly, I tend to see them as just like anybody else. I mean, you don't want everybody who ever crossed your path to look at you like you're some kind of freak of nature. You don't want people looking at you and wondering if you're 'woman enough' to enter a bathroom. You don't want people treating you differently than the way you look. Other people don't want that, either.

Oh, I almost forgot. A part of what you said above leads me to think you are confusing gender with sexuality. Gender isn't about who you are sexually attracted to. Who you sleep with (or want to sleep with) has very little to do with who you are as a person. One is your identity and the other is your sexual orientation, which are two entirely different things.

Hope you guys are doing well. It's been a pleasure talking to you.




_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 9:14:32 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

Again, what we were discussing was Obama's directive and the Democrat party platform, allowing anyone to go into any bathroom or shower etc, at any time




< Message edited by BoscoX -- 2/26/2017 9:16:33 AM >


_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 9:44:38 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Again, what we were discussing was Obama's directive and the Democrat party platform, allowing anyone to go into any bathroom or shower etc, at any time

Actually bozo, the thread is discussing the reversal of Obama's directive that allowed people to use whatever restroom/toilet of the gender that they associate themselves with - NOT anyone going anywhere at any time.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 9:46:06 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Again, what we were discussing was Obama's directive and the Democrat party platform, allowing anyone to go into any bathroom or shower etc, at any time

Actually bozo, the thread is discussing the reversal of Obama's directive that allowed people to use whatever restroom/toilet of the gender that they associate themselves with - NOT anyone going anywhere at any time.



You don't understand it then.

Don't let that stop you from preaching on about it though

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 9:54:27 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
The Obama directive removing protections from girls and women:

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201605-title-ix-transgender.pdf

Anyone may identify as any gender at any time, and must be allowed to enter any restroom, shower, dorm, etc at any time

(Your federal tax dollars at work)




< Message edited by BoscoX -- 2/26/2017 10:08:11 AM >


_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 10:11:50 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

The Obama directive removing protections from girls and women:

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201605-title-ix-transgender.pdf

Anyone may identify as any gender at any time, and has to be allowed to enter any restroom at any time

(Your federal tax dollars at work)

Idiot!!
Of course you can identify with whatever gender you wish and at any time you wish.
But... it doesn't allow you to as a male to walk into a female restroom and claim you are now 'female' or vice-versa.

From your source -
Gender transition refers to the process in which transgender individuals begin asserting the sex that corresponds to their gender identity instead of the sex they were assigned at birth. During gender transition, individuals begin to live and identify as the sex consistent with their gender identity and may dress differently, adopt a new name, and use pronouns consistent with their gender identity. Transgender individuals may undergo gender transition at any stage of their lives, and gender transition can happen swiftly or over a long duration of time.

And -
This means that a school must not treat a transgender student differently from the way it treats other students of the same gender identity. The Departments’ interpretation is consistent with courts’ and other agencies’ interpretations of Federal laws prohibiting sex discrimination.

And -
Title IX’s implementing regulations permit a school to provide sex-segregated restrooms, locker rooms, shower facilities, housing, and athletic teams, as well as single-sex classes under certain circumstances.
When a school provides sex-segregated activities and facilities, transgender students must be allowed to participate in such activities and access such facilities consistent with their gender identity.



Nowhere does it state that the circumstances you allude to are allowed.

What a bozo.



_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 10:14:25 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Greta75
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Cite please.



I am not citing what I see everyday in Malaysia and Singapore and even in Indonesia.


as usual nothing to back up your very shallow lies.


They all wear make up and wear high heels.
If you don't believe, go travel to a Muslim country and see for yourself.

So ,according to you, they are not real muslims and the men will kill them. But waite if you see them and the men have not killed them how is it that the muslims run that third world shithole called singapore as you claim?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.


But you can read about Saudi women here. There is even National geographic documentary on this! Showing the behind the scene and it's exactly as this person describes.

https://www.esl101.com/blogs/fashion-saudi-arabia#.WLL32jjuq5w

The Saudi women dress to impress…and by that I mean impress other women because men aren’t seeing them.

Jesus you are phoquing stupid


Here I am proving to you that Saudi women wear make up. And here you are all denying things in the face of the truth. Who is the liar? You.
Men can't see their make up because they cover their face infront of men. But they do not need to cover themselves infront of fellow women. So only women get to see their make up. But they have make up on ALL THE TIME!

I think the only moslem country that has an outright ban on makeup is Iran, and that's more down to Khomenei's peculiar interpretation of the shi'ite faith than anything in the quran itself.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 10:26:54 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 10663
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

The Obama directive removing protections from girls and women:

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201605-title-ix-transgender.pdf

Anyone may identify as any gender at any time, and has to be allowed to enter any restroom at any time

(Your federal tax dollars at work)

Idiot!!
Of course you can identify with whatever gender you wish and at any time you wish.
But... it doesn't allow you to as a male to walk into a female restroom and claim you are now 'female' or vice-versa.

From your source -
Gender transition refers to the process in which transgender individuals begin asserting the sex that corresponds to their gender identity instead of the sex they were assigned at birth. During gender transition, individuals begin to live and identify as the sex consistent with their gender identity and may dress differently, adopt a new name, and use pronouns consistent with their gender identity. Transgender individuals may undergo gender transition at any stage of their lives, and gender transition can happen swiftly or over a long duration of time.

And -
This means that a school must not treat a transgender student differently from the way it treats other students of the same gender identity. The Departments’ interpretation is consistent with courts’ and other agencies’ interpretations of Federal laws prohibiting sex discrimination.

And -
Title IX’s implementing regulations permit a school to provide sex-segregated restrooms, locker rooms, shower facilities, housing, and athletic teams, as well as single-sex classes under certain circumstances.
When a school provides sex-segregated activities and facilities, transgender students must be allowed to participate in such activities and access such facilities consistent with their gender identity.



Nowhere does it state that the circumstances you allude to are allowed.

What a bozo.




Sorry little reptile dude, that backs up exactly what I posted.

Thank you for playing though

_____________________________

Hunter is the smartest guy I know

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 10:41:06 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Greta75
ORIGINAL: thompsonx



Cite please.



I am not citing what I see everyday in Malaysia and Singapore and even in Indonesia.


as usual nothing to back up your very shallow lies.


They all wear make up and wear high heels.
If you don't believe, go travel to a Muslim country and see for yourself.

So ,according to you, they are not real muslims and the men will kill them. But waite if you see them and the men have not killed them how is it that the muslims run that third world shithole called singapore as you claim?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.


But you can read about Saudi women here. There is even National geographic documentary on this! Showing the behind the scene and it's exactly as this person describes.

https://www.esl101.com/blogs/fashion-saudi-arabia#.WLL32jjuq5w

The Saudi women dress to impress…and by that I mean impress other women because men aren’t seeing them.

Jesus you are phoquing stupid

[/quote]

Here I am proving to you that Saudi women wear make up.


Not in public dumbass, only with other women after they have been escorted there by their male "protectors"
Now if you wish to play dumbass be my guest. The article you cited is quite clear that they are not allowed to be "out and about".
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.




And here you are all denying things in the face of the truth. Who is the liar?

You are once again proved to be a liar.


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 10:54:46 AM   
GaryWilcox


Posts: 95
Joined: 4/8/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
Incorrect.

From eaglerising: A biological man, Christopher Hambrook, claimed to be ‘transgender’ in order to prey on women at two Toronto shelters. He was recently jailed “indefinitely” after a judge declared him to be a “dangerous offender.”

The Toronto Sun reports that Hambrook, a man, who called himself “Jessica,” entered women’s shelters and sexually assaulted several women in 2012. He served four years in jail in Montreal for a 2002 sexual assault of a five-year-old girl, and for raping a mentally challenged 27-year-old woman while on bail for the first crime.

Oh... you don't know the difference between transvestites and transgenders! For the record, transvestites are not transgenders.

Transvestic fetishism is not something that can be easily confused with transgender body issues. One is about sexual pleasure; the other is about changing your gender identity.

But what a link, man. I can honestly say, I have never, before today, heard of a rapist dressing as a woman to get more private access to women and attack them. It sounds like he's been doing this to get into women's shelters. So there have been at least one case of someone acting as a transvestite for evil purposes.
quote:

Court also heard evidence of Hambrook terrorizing a deaf woman living in the shelter. “The accused grabbed the complainant’s hand and forcibly placed it on his crotch area while his penis was erect,” court heard.

The same deaf women reported that Hambrook would peer at her through a gap between the door and its frame while she showered.
I just want to point out that this person is in no way actually a transwoman. He's a transvestite fetishists using the law to sneak in, and is as much an invader as a big burly biker coming into the ladies room and doing the exact same things.

But, it still qualifies, because for the victim, it all amounts to the same. That is a real-life horror story. Since you rightly caught me napping on Hambrook (had never even heard this story), I decided to keep digging and see whom else I could find, and what the circumstances of the case were.

Patrick Hagan, a crossdresser, got into a fight in Tampa, Florida because a woman in the bathroom questioned his right to be there. Hagan, from all accounts, is an asshole who didn't like being told he couldn't be a woman at a bar for transvestitites. Again, not transgender, just someone who wants to wear women's clothing.

Then there's Norwood Smith Burnes of Rome, Georgia. He was crossdressing in the bathroom and got naked. A trend is starting to emerge. These are all men who dress up as women for gratification, not people experiencing a change in gender. But, better to keep going, because their might just be a transgender rapist to be found somewhere.

Richard Rodriguez in Virginia. He cross-dressed to get access to changing rooms and then filmed it. Not an actual transgender, just wolf in sheep's clothing. I don't see anything in the reporting to suggest he is transgender or even a transvestic fetishist, just a guy in a weird disguise to perv on women. This is kind of valid. This shows men being clever in trying to use the law to take advantage. This guy is in a league with Hambrook, I'd imagine.

Jason Pomare also did the dress-up. Can't find anything that says if he is an actual transgender person, a fetishist, or just a creepy dude, so I'll have to go with creepy dude.

Last two credible incidents I can find are about two Canucks using cell phones over showers in co-ed showering facilities. This one doesn't even qualify as fetishism. I would hope both men were expelled and faced jail time.

This isn't the part where I go, See? You're wrong and I'm right. Because looking at these cases, I admit, it is difficult to decide how to proceed knowing guys will do creepy shit to perv. I hate that a legitimately transgender person has to suffer for these kind of pricks.

quote:

Again, incorrect.

From menshealth: We all start as a generic embryo. You have a set of male or female sex chromosomes, but the distinction doesn't kick in until your hormones enter the picture, he explains. Without hormones like testosterone, you would stay on the path to womanhood.

So right from the outset, unless you have a chromosome disorder, your sex is determined at the point of conception.
You are not born female then transition in-utero as he claims.

You are totally right about this! I had read an article about twins the other day that led me astray, suggesting it occurred weeks into the pregnancy and not at the sperm fertilized the egg and contributed a chromosome.

quote:

I think Gary is somewhat TG-friendly to the extent that they dismiss real facts about trans people to play down real people's fears.
Kaloko's fears are real and should be addressed properly and correctly; not white-washed over by the likes of Gary.

Meh... there wasn't an attempt here to dismiss Kaliko's fears with lies, actually, but I did address them without knowing anything about seven attempts by perverts and fetishists to use gender tolerance laws to perv, and one straight-up brawl over who has rights to be in a certain bathroom. That's true. I should have been aware that someone had actually made such an attempt-- I just had no idea, and assumed it would have been big news.

After looking at freedomdwarf1's info, Kaliko, I would suggest just bearing in mind that transvestic fetishism isn't a part of being transgender, and decide for yourself what is fair. I am going to have to have a serious think about this, because as much as I hate my TG friends to experience discrimination, male dickery seems unlikely to end, and it will have to be taken into consideration in honestly tackling the subject.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 11:03:44 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Not in public dumbass, only with other women after they have been escorted there by their male "protectors"

Wait? Are you seriously this retarded with your logic? A woman who has thick make up on her face. FULL MAKE UP, but puts a veil to cover her entire face when she is in the presence of a man, is not wearing make up?
Wow! Great logic dude!

Your question was, "Muslim women wear make up?"

And my answer was, YES THEY DO WEAR MAKE UP! Even Saudi Women! And I am completely 101% right.

You're having a Trump moment now.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 11:12:10 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

I hate that a legitimately transgender person has to suffer for these kind of pricks.

I think that was the crux of the whole thing.
That's why, I still think third toilet solution is the best.
So nobody has to suffer.

Because if you really think about it. Gay men might get shit from Straight men in Male Toilets too. But Gay men can't enter Female Toilets.

So LGBT Toilet is necessary!

Have you seen men who dress as a perfectly straight male, but walks like his cat walks, sashaying his hips? I can only imagine the bullying that guy would get in male toilets for walking like a woman. It's not just transgender who might be at the receiving end of bullying in male toilets.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 2/26/2017 11:14:51 AM >

(in reply to GaryWilcox)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 11:12:33 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Greta75
ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Not in public dumbass, only with other women after they have been escorted there by their male "protectors"

Wait? Are you seriously this retarded with your logic?

What are you seriouysly retarded in your logic?

A woman who has thick make up on her face. FULL MAKE UP, but puts a veil to cover her entire face when she is in the presence of a man, is not wearing make up?

If you have your head up your ass while you talk who hears it besides you?
same logic dumbass.



Wow! Great logic dude!

Wow great logic dudette.

Your question was, "Muslim women wear make up?"

And my answer was, YES THEY DO WEAR MAKE UP! Even Saudi Women! And I am completely 101% right.

No, as usual ,you have your head up your ass making noises with your mouth.




(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 11:13:06 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Sorry little reptile dude, that backs up exactly what I posted.

Thank you for playing though

Reading isn't your strong point is it?

Try reading your link.
It does NOT backup your assertion.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 11:15:13 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Not in public dumbass, only with other women after they have been escorted there by their male "protectors"

Wait? Are you seriously this retarded with your logic? A woman who has thick make up on her face. FULL MAKE UP, but puts a veil to cover her entire face when she is in the presence of a man, is not wearing make up?
Wow! Great logic dude!

Your question was, "Muslim women wear make up?"

And my answer was, YES THEY DO WEAR MAKE UP! Even Saudi Women! And I am completely 101% right.

You're having a Trump moment now.

The point he is making is.... the women can't get to meet other women to admire their makeup without having their male escort to take them there and back.



_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 11:18:53 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
The point he is making is.... the women can't get to meet other women to admire their makeup without having their male escort to take them there and back.

No, this whole original posts started with. He asked me incredulously that Muslim women wear make up? And asked me for citation that Muslim women wear make up.

Then I said Saudi women wear make up, and show him an article that proves it.
And he is saying that Saudi women do not wear make up infront of men or in public.

But THEY DO wear make up in public. The make up is still on their face despite having a veil! That's wearing make up in public.

And for gawd's sake. You can still see the make up on their eyes. Eye liner, eye shadow, lashes extensions.

Saudi ain't Afghanistan after all. Their eyes are still there.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 2/26/2017 11:19:20 AM >

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back - 2/26/2017 11:37:56 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
Incorrect.

From eaglerising: A biological man, Christopher Hambrook, claimed to be ‘transgender’ in order to prey on women at two Toronto shelters. He was recently jailed “indefinitely” after a judge declared him to be a “dangerous offender.”

The Toronto Sun reports that Hambrook, a man, who called himself “Jessica,” entered women’s shelters and sexually assaulted several women in 2012. He served four years in jail in Montreal for a 2002 sexual assault of a five-year-old girl, and for raping a mentally challenged 27-year-old woman while on bail for the first crime.

Oh... you don't know the difference between transvestites and transgenders! For the record, transvestites are not transgenders.

I know the difference between the two.
The man claimed to be 'transgender', NOT transvestite.

And this is the very reason for people's fears.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox
But what a link, man. I can honestly say, I have never, before today, heard of a rapist dressing as a woman to get more private access to women and attack them. It sounds like he's been doing this to get into women's shelters. So there have been at least one case of someone acting as a transvestite for evil purposes.
quote:

Court also heard evidence of Hambrook terrorizing a deaf woman living in the shelter. “The accused grabbed the complainant’s hand and forcibly placed it on his crotch area while his penis was erect,” court heard.

The same deaf women reported that Hambrook would peer at her through a gap between the door and its frame while she showered.
I just want to point out that this person is in no way actually a transwoman. He's a transvestite fetishists using the law to sneak in, and is as much an invader as a big burly biker coming into the ladies room and doing the exact same things.

Just goes to show that you know nothing but your opinion.
TG's do rape.
And that was by no means the only quote for that activity.

And no, we are NOT talking TV's here.
They are people claiming they are transgender.

Patrick Hagan, a crossdresser, got into a fight in Tampa, Florida because a woman in the bathroom questioned his right to be there. Hagan, from all accounts, is an asshole who didn't like being told he couldn't be a woman at a bar for transvestitites. Again, not transgender, just someone who wants to wear women's clothing.

Then there's Norwood Smith Burnes of Rome, Georgia. He was crossdressing in the bathroom and got naked. A trend is starting to emerge. These are all men who dress up as women for gratification, not people experiencing a change in gender. But, better to keep going, because their might just be a transgender rapist to be found somewhere.

Richard Rodriguez in Virginia. He cross-dressed to get access to changing rooms and then filmed it. Not an actual transgender, just wolf in sheep's clothing. I don't see anything in the reporting to suggest he is transgender or even a transvestic fetishist, just a guy in a weird disguise to perv on women. This is kind of valid. This shows men being clever in trying to use the law to take advantage. This guy is in a league with Hambrook, I'd imagine.
<snip>
Those examples are irrelevant because they weren't, nor claimed to be, transgender.
I debunked your statement.
That's all that counts.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox
I hate that a legitimately transgender person has to suffer for these kind of pricks.

Try explaining the legitimate TG's to their victims who suffered.
Your whitewash statement was crap. Period.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox
quote:

Again, incorrect.

From menshealth: We all start as a generic embryo. You have a set of male or female sex chromosomes, but the distinction doesn't kick in until your hormones enter the picture, he explains. Without hormones like testosterone, you would stay on the path to womanhood.

So right from the outset, unless you have a chromosome disorder, your sex is determined at the point of conception.
You are not born female then transition in-utero as he claims.

You are totally right about this! I had read an article about twins the other day that led me astray, suggesting it occurred weeks into the pregnancy and not at the sperm fertilized the egg and contributed a chromosome.

Glad to be of help to enlightenment!

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox
quote:

I think Gary is somewhat TG-friendly to the extent that they dismiss real facts about trans people to play down real people's fears.
Kaloko's fears are real and should be addressed properly and correctly; not white-washed over by the likes of Gary.

Meh... there wasn't an attempt here to dismiss Kaliko's fears with lies, actually, but I did address them without knowing anything about seven attempts by perverts and fetishists to use gender tolerance laws to perv, and one straight-up brawl over who has rights to be in a certain bathroom. That's true. I should have been aware that someone had actually made such an attempt-- I just had no idea, and assumed it would have been big news.

Sometimes it pays to do your homework.

But Kaliko raised a very valid and poignant point.
These are indeed valid and justified fears for ordinary people.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox
After looking at freedomdwarf1's info, Kaliko, I would suggest just bearing in mind that transvestic fetishism isn't a part of being transgender, and decide for yourself what is fair. I am going to have to have a serious think about this, because as much as I hate my TG friends to experience discrimination, male dickery seems unlikely to end, and it will have to be taken into consideration in honestly tackling the subject.

I'm not against transgendered people although my opinions of them are known and in my profile.
But honestly, where there is a way, some douch-canoe will take advantage of it in a very nefarious way.
Most TG's are probably safe.
But how do you tell the difference between the genuine and the flake predators??
That's at the root of this.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to GaryWilcox)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Trump Deportation Plan and bringing safe toilets back Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094