RE: California historic wildfires

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: California historic wildfires

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: California historic wildfires

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: California historic wildfires - 12/10/2017 5:13:58 PM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
"[Awaiting Approval] thompsonx"
still loving it...now if we could just get your fellow comrade mnottertroll's fake profile taken care of.

If I remember correctly, he lives out in CA, so he might have a lot to contribute to this thread.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to bounty44)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: California historic wildfires - 12/10/2017 7:30:11 PM

Wayward5oul

Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"[Awaiting Approval] thompsonx"

still loving it...now if we could just get your fellow comrade mnottertroll's fake profile taken care of.

At one time, it was pointed out by a moderator that posters who are not here, for whatever reason, to defend themselves against other posters' comments should not be mentioned by other posters. It was either in ToS or general forum guidelines.

Same with people putting on hide. Anyone who puts a poster on hide should not talk about that poster as the two cannot hold a dialogue about what was said.

That and it is, in my opinion, a bit rude.

(in reply to bounty44)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: California historic wildfires - 12/11/2017 1:32:55 AM

DaddySatyr

Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

There is little-to-no doubt that one of our more heinously offensive new posters is, indeed, a sock for a poster that's been on a little mod-assisted vacation. So, that poster is, indeed, here to defend themselves.

The thing about the hide has always seemed craven to me, when the mods used to advise it.

If you put me on hide and post: "Michael, you're a dickhead", I will still see it. You won't see my response to you.

If my response is: "You're a twat-waffle", you're the one that "won't be able to respond".

I would tell a moderator about someone being abusive and they'd say: "Put them on hide" which would prevent me from seeing it, but not the hundreds of other denizens of this site. Kinda silly, that.

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Wayward5oul)

Profile

Post #: 43