Focus50
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004 From: Newcastle, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika quote:
I have neither time nor respect for those who preach a "sub-first" philosophy for Dom/mes as I regard my dominance as an integral part of my sexuality. I'm no more wired to submit than I'm wired to be female. Really, does a man have to get pregnant to be a "better" man? Can't we just accept fact that pregnancy is what females are equipped for....? And so it is for submitting - it's what submissives are equipped to do.... Well now you are comparing biological limitations with psychological predispositions. Actually, I’m not sure exactly what it is that you are arguing, but let me take a jab at it as I kind of like doing things like this. If I understand the point you are trying to make, I don't think that your comparison is full-proof. You talk about integral parts of us defining who we are. For one, you are talking about a very black/white situation of "having the proper biological equipment to conceive a child or not" and trying to apply it to a situation of personal choice. Realize that not all women can conceive children and this does not make them less of a woman. A lot of women can technically conceive a child yet do not want to, which again doesn't make them less of a woman. I guess what I'm trying to say is that in your seemingly analysis, you have way too many uncontrollable variables to make is so cause & effect. Just like I've discovered over time that I have a strong dominant side and that I am primarily attracted to men, it hasn't always been so. I permit myself to go with the flow and see where life takes me. I don't cage myself into an imperative or role that I will become prisoner of. And for the record, I think a lot of people here simply said that it *might* be helpful, but absolutely not necessary, for people to attempt to experience the other side of the coin. So please, give us your time & respect. ;) The key word in my passage you've quoted is "preach". Over the years, I've had too many "enlightened" Dom/mes try to tell me (and the BDSM world) that bottoming first is the only way a "true" and caring Dom/me evolves and matures. Absolute CRAP! Like I said in the part you've cut out, I respect that it may be their experience and belief etc, but it's not mine nor many other Dom/mes, I'd wager! I don't think biological limitations are any greater or less than the limitations of a particular mindset or "hardwiring" - hence I stand by my pregnancy analogy. Or are you arguing that having the same physical equipment as a homosexual, for example, means there's nothing preventing me from being gay or experimenting with a gay experience? Like submitting, that ain't gonna happen, either! Yes, many people did say "that it *might* be helpful, but absolutely not necessary, for people to attempt to experience the other side of the coin." And I do respect their opinion, belief or experience etc - I have no issue with that other than it's not for me. Preaching that it's the only way and berating those who disagree is a whole other matter. My original statement (preaching) was not aimed specifically at anyone in this thread; but I've had this argument so many times in other Forums that I thought I'd get it on the record, first. Focus50.
|