CuriousLord
Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: HornyToadsMI CuriousLord - Please allow me to humbly disagree with your definition. In my other lifestyle (yes, i am one of those nasty swinger types...lol) Vanilla is defined as having monogamous sex in your relationship, no matter how miserable you may be. Therefore, those of us who indulge in anything other than the socially excepted norm are not Vanilla. I do hate labels.....but it does make something more exciting cuz it is dirty!!! lol. And to be honest, most relationships do have some form of power transfer, they just don't realize it. Boss/employee, Husband/wife (I don't mean to classify as Male/female since so many other variations exist). That's an interesting view. Perhaps, would should say that, to be vanilla with respect to a lifestyle is to not embrace it, in favor of more convential norms? For BDSM, this would mean without pronounced D/s or sado-masochistic aspects, for, swingers, this would mean monogomous aspects. Or, then, you could defined vanilla with respect to several lifestyles- such as, both BDSM and the swinger lifestyle, in which case "vanilla" would mean a lack of all aspects considered deviant in BDSM and the swinger lifestyle- this is to say, being vanilla with both respects would be relatively mutual-control, no sadism/masochistm, and monogomous. I was defining "vanilla with respect to BDSM", as I feel it was context. But your point that "vanilla" can be with respect to other things as well is a good one, calling for a more complete definition.
|