Griswold -> RE: When is a Gallon of Gas Not a Gallon? (6/10/2007 4:47:28 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: selfbnd411 When it's hot. Funny how the gas dealers want to control the temperature of gasoline when they buy it from refineries, but not when they sell it to you and me. Could it be because that saves them from having to provide us with an actual gallon of gasoline? Nah! Kucinich is hot over loss at pump Says fuel expansion aids Big Oil, cheats consumers Saturday, June 09, 2007 Stephen Koff Plain Dealer Bureau Chief Washington- If you filled up your gas tank Friday, you probably got ripped off - and you will continue to be, as long as temperatures stay above 60 degrees. At least that's what Dennis Kucinich, the Democratic congressman from Cleveland, said in a hearing Friday that oil company executives boycotted and Republicans critiqued as "political theater." Kucinich and several experts, however, said his critique was based on the laws of physics and the practices of the gasoline industry. He and other Democrats on the House Domestic Policy subcommittee that he chairs say they want to give drivers relief. he physics: Liquid expands as it gets warm, but energy molecules don't follow in a corresponding fashion. So, if a gallon of gasoline containing a fixed amount of energy expands in warm weather, it requires more than a gallon to produce the same amount of energy. In driving terms, the tiger in your tank becomes more like a big pussycat. Your gallon of gas doesn't take you quite as far. Oil companies and gas station owners have long been aware of "hot fuel" expansion. To control these volume and cost variables, they compensate at the whole- sale level, using a formula that factors the fuel sold to service stations at the 60-degree Fahren- heit volume. But that means that when the temperature is above 60 degrees, the gas station benefits. For example, expansion can turn a station's 9,793 gallons at 60 degrees into 10,000 gallons at 90 degrees, according to a new report by Kucinich's subcommittee. Contraction can do the opposite, but on average the temperature swings in the United States benefit the oil companies, not the consumers, according to John Siebert of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Foundation. Kucinich wants to adopt a system, perhaps voluntary like in Canada, that includes automatic temperature-compensation equipment. It would give consumers information on a fuel's true cost. If the oil companies were held accountable, Kucinich said, American drivers could save $1.5 billion this summer - the amount that will be spent on 513.8 million gallons of gas affected by thermal expansion. "People are paying for gasoline they are not getting," Kucinich said. "This is Big Oil's double standard." Republicans refused to attend Kucinich's hearing, as did oil company representatives. But in a letter to Kucinich, Exxon Mobil Vice President Daniel Nelson said that different blends and energy content of gasoline in differ ent states would require a confusing "patchwork of regulations from state to state." ... http://www.cleveland.com/open/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/isope/1181393845116430.xml&coll=2 Facinating stuff...and I expect, somewhat accurate. However, consider that federal environmental law requires all (commercial, "below ground") fuel tanks to be placed at no less than 4 feet below grade (I don't know why). At 7 feet, most temperatures are a constant 55 degrees (some variance in that is included in the assumption), hence why so many people are investing in heat pumps that use the earth as a cooling as well as heating source (i.e., its consistancy).
|
|
|
|