Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/28/2007 6:46:56 AM   
cyberdude611


Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline
With Congress with approval rating in the teens, and with the average wages around the country either holding steady or declining... the Democratic-lead House of Represenatives voted to give themselves, Senators, the Vice President, and Supreme Court justices a $4,400 annual pay raise.

Well...isn't that nice?

---------------------------------

House Members Seek Pay Raise of $4,400


WASHINGTON (AP) - Despite low approval ratings and hard feelings from last year's elections, Democrats and Republicans in the House are reaching out for an approximately $4,400 pay raise that would increase their salaries to almost $170,000.

The cost-of-living raise endorsed Wednesday evening gets lawmakers back on track for automatic pay raises after a fight between the parties last year and again in January killed the pay increase due this year. That was the first interruption of the annual congressional pay boost in seven years.
The blowup came after Democrats last year fulfilled a campaign promise to deny themselves more pay until Congress raised the minimum wage. Delays in the minimum wage bill cost every lawmaker about $3,100 this year.

On a 244-181 vote Wednesday, Democrats and Republicans alike killed a bid by Reps. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, and Lee Terry, R-Neb., to get a direct vote to block the COLA, which is automatically awarded unless lawmakers vote to block it. The Senate has not indicated when it will deal with a similar measure.

As part of an ethics bill in 1989, Congress gave up its ability to accept pay for speeches and made annual cost-of-living pay increases automatic unless the lawmakers voted otherwise.

The annual vote on the pay hike comes on an obscure procedural move - instead of a direct up-or-down vote - and Democratic and GOP leaders each delivered a majority of their members to shut off the move to block the pay hike.

This year's vote was made ticklish by last year's battle. Republicans said Democrats broke a promise not to use the pay raise issue against GOP lawmakers in campaign ads and therefore were, generally speaking, more reluctant to supply votes.

Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo., worked the floor during the vote to make sure there was relative balance between the warring parties in delivering votes. Working through Blunt, Hoyer forced more than a dozen Republicans to switch their votes in support of accepting the raise, including Reps. Mike Pence and Dan Burton of Indiana and Fred Upton, Dave Camp and Vernon Ehlers of Michigan.

Most members support the pay raise as a means of retaining experienced lawmakers and of making sure that Congress is not simply dominated by wealthy people. Many lawmakers maintain homes both in the expensive Washington housing market and back in their districts. On most days, they meet with lobbyists making far more than they do.

"Every member has some obligation to the institution for the compensation to, as much as possible, keep pace with inflation," Blunt told reporters Wednesday.

"I don't think this is the right time for members of Congress to be allowing the pay raise to go through without even an up-or-down vote," said Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah. "We need to show the American people we are willing to make some sacrifices ... that we recognize there's a struggle for some in today's economy."

The exact figure for this year's cost of living adjustment has not been settled under a complicated formula that awards lawmakers a smaller pay raise than civil servants. But opponents of the congressional COLA estimated a pay increase this year of 2.7 percent, or $4,460.

Senators and representatives presently make $165,200 a year, with a handful of leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., earning more.

The pay raise would also apply to the vice president - who is president of the Senate - congressional leaders and Supreme Court justices.

This year, Vice President Dick Cheney, Pelosi and Chief Justice John Roberts receive $212,100. Associate justices receive $203,000. House and Senate party leaders get $183,500.

President Bush's salary of $400,000 is unaffected by the legislation.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070628/D8Q1QF4O0.html
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/28/2007 6:49:18 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Having done such a bang up job in policy and bills abroad, and with all the wonderful measures here at home, I say why not (...) ?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/28/2007 7:20:18 AM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
This is a prime example of why we need term limits.  These positions were never supposed to be a career. 

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/28/2007 9:17:07 AM   
dragone


Posts: 215
Joined: 5/29/2007
Status: offline
here it comes....prelude to the election; anything and everything is focus on the Dems. reminding us all, of who they are, what unpopular crap they are up to.  Hey, has the repulican house, in the past, done anything; that should have been focused on?

Pay raise...yeah, why not, how about getting stamps up to 80 cents per.

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/28/2007 9:24:56 AM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

This is a prime example of why we need term limits.  These positions were never supposed to be a career. 


I agree.

One term in Congress or the Executive branch.

One term in prison.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/28/2007 1:18:43 PM   
dragone


Posts: 215
Joined: 5/29/2007
Status: offline
Hi; I agree as well; and when you see the pay they get...remember, that does not include the expense account, speaker engagements, and a host of other perks.

They need this 4G's; but wait, soon, very soon, Social Security will be the focus, and we need the'fix'; and then the cuts to the social programs, more, even more than Knewt Ginrich DID.

When Ginrich, was Speaker of the House, during Clinton; when he blocked certain proposals he said..."it's about time the president found out who really runs this country."

Ah well, in the words of our dearly, revered, since sadly departed 'great communicator'.....I'm the president and what are you going to do about it.

Before you jump my case. I believe; that regarding this so-called, two party system; it's one coin with the same face on both sides.

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/28/2007 2:06:59 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
hmm- i thought they would attach it to a minumum wage bill.   CEOs should have a maximun wage.

(in reply to dragone)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/28/2007 2:15:10 PM   
BOUNTYHUNTER


Posts: 9259
Joined: 2/5/2004
Status: offline
"Before you jump my case. I believe; that regarding this so-called, two party system; it's one coin with the same face on both sides. "

I cound"t agree more,same crooks with a different name...bounty

_____________________________

US going to hell in a hand basket/

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/29/2007 7:22:37 PM   
dragone


Posts: 215
Joined: 5/29/2007
Status: offline
Hey, they did; didn't you read it: CEO's politicians, are to recieve a maximum wage, no less than what they can extort, and fuck the public out of with and with no accountability whatsoever.  Gee, didn't you vote on it? I'm surprised.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/29/2007 7:29:13 PM   
selfbnd411


Posts: 598
Joined: 7/23/2005
Status: offline
I don't see anything wrong with a COLA.  At $170,000, they're hardly overpaid.  The president of my university makes $300,000/yr.  A paper-pusher I know at the National Archives makes $90,000.  Another friend of mine is an entry level chemist and he makes $55,000/yr.  $170,000 to run a country doesn't sound extravagant at all.

(in reply to dragone)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/29/2007 7:31:55 PM   
snappykappy


Posts: 616
Joined: 3/5/2005
Status: offline
nope should give them only a two year term

if they do good the first year then they get to serve the second year

also if they want a pay raise they first if they have children of age put them in the military and send them to fight overseas

and if they are of age then they should serve in the military at least 6 years

do you think they would send their loved ones to be in harms way then why send anyone else

also is w and slick dick going to be taken to task about the suppoena

(in reply to dragone)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/29/2007 7:43:30 PM   
MstrDouglas


Posts: 75
Joined: 11/15/2005
Status: offline
Nope, 170K isnt too bad, especially when you consider that they will get that for the rest of their lives.  They also voted to make their retirement the same as what they got while serving in office, and to get that retirement, all you have to serve is one term.  Nope, not too bad at all, and before you bring up the speaking fee's, yes they voted to not allow them WHILE they were in office...just makes them more "valueable" after they leave office.  Oh, and for anyone that didnt know, they do NOT pay into the Social Security funds, they exempted themselves.  Dont you wish we could all do that for ourselves?  How many other jobs are there that the employee gets to set their own pay and pay raises?

Edited for spelling and grammer....been long day.

< Message edited by MstrDouglas -- 6/29/2007 7:45:42 PM >

(in reply to selfbnd411)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/29/2007 8:51:45 PM   
HaveRopeWillBind


Posts: 514
Joined: 7/15/2006
Status: offline
Who says Congress can never agree on anything long enough to pass a bill? This proves that when it really matters to them they can come to an agreement and fast track a bill straight to legislation. All those other issues out there are just not so important to them.

(in reply to MstrDouglas)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/30/2007 8:57:05 AM   
SubinMaine


Posts: 1888
Joined: 1/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MstrDouglas

Nope, 170K isnt too bad, especially when you consider that they will get that for the rest of their lives.  They also voted to make their retirement the same as what they got while serving in office, and to get that retirement, all you have to serve is one term.  Nope, not too bad at all, and before you bring up the speaking fee's, yes they voted to not allow them WHILE they were in office...just makes them more "valueable" after they leave office.  Oh, and for anyone that didnt know, they do NOT pay into the Social Security funds, they exempted themselves.  Dont you wish we could all do that for ourselves?  How many other jobs are there that the employee gets to set their own pay and pay raises?

Edited for spelling and grammer....been long day.


MstrD stole my response....*wink*

i know i'd LOVE to have a position where i only had to work one contracted term and be guaranteed that wage for the rest of my life....and considering the $ they'll make out of office for speaking engagements, i'm thinking they'll have no "issue" with any cost of living increases.




< Message edited by SubinMaine -- 6/30/2007 8:58:26 AM >


_____________________________

That which yields is not always weak...

(in reply to MstrDouglas)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 6/30/2007 10:36:35 AM   
selfbnd411


Posts: 598
Joined: 7/23/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SubinMaine

i know i'd LOVE to have a position where i only had to work one contracted term and be guaranteed that wage for the rest of my life....and considering the $ they'll make out of office for speaking engagements, i'm thinking they'll have no "issue" with any cost of living increases.



I bet members of Congress would love to have a retirement system like that too.  What a shame it doesn't exist:

"Members are eligible to start collecting at age 62 if they have at least five years of service. If they have 20 years of service under their belt, they can retire at 50. With 25 years of service, they can retire any time.


What they get depends on a formula based on years of service and average pay(natch, right?). So a congressman with 22 years of service and whose average salary for the top three years was $153,900 gets $84,645. A current congressman ending up with six years of service (it's two-year terms, after all) would get at least $16,503 (at age 62, of course).

In actuality, the average congressional pension payment ranges between $41,000 and $55,000, based on 2002 data from the Congressional Research Service."

Now, a retiring congressman isn't allowed to get more than 80 percent of their salary upon retirement. But after retiring, cost of living adjustments kick in, which can add substantially to the payment."

That's a fantastic plan, no doubt.  But it's not the retirement MstrDouglas said they get.  As to speaking fees....Name the last Congressman in your House district.  I.e., the one who preceded your current representative.  Can't name him/her?  Neither can I.  Nobody cares about Congressmen, and nobody's throwing speaking fees at them.


http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/20/commentary/wastler/wastler/index.htm

(in reply to SubinMaine)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 7/2/2007 5:53:31 PM   
dragone


Posts: 215
Joined: 5/29/2007
Status: offline
Hey, me neither, I gave myself a 10 g raise, funny however, I don't have any tax payers that I can get it from, so I thought I would cut some SS benefits, and I didn't have any.  Run a country...like being partner to Haliburton. Are you serious; You say some brillent things here, and then you go into the trash bin. Snappy has the right idea.

Oh yeah, these guys maintain two, three residences, GEEZUS, I'm having trouble keeping up with my appliance box mortgage.

give me a break; they are richer than god.

(in reply to selfbnd411)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 7/2/2007 7:35:23 PM   
snappykappy


Posts: 616
Joined: 3/5/2005
Status: offline
tyvm dragone

and now that w has given the release to libby can food what else is he gonna do to get away with b4 he is out of office and then no one can get him cause if a publican gets in they will just pardon him also

anyone ever hear of the silent warriors


(in reply to dragone)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 7/3/2007 9:11:06 AM   
dragone


Posts: 215
Joined: 5/29/2007
Status: offline
And people say GWB is not compassionate and fair.

BTW, a crew of construction guys were short-payed by the contractor; en-mass they protested the short paychecks...seems these guys gave themselves a raise, never bothered to ask the employing contractor if they could. LOL, LOL

(in reply to snappykappy)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 7/3/2007 9:44:28 AM   
SubinMaine


Posts: 1888
Joined: 1/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: selfbnd411

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubinMaine

i know i'd LOVE to have a position where i only had to work one contracted term and be guaranteed that wage for the rest of my life....and considering the $ they'll make out of office for speaking engagements, i'm thinking they'll have no "issue" with any cost of living increases.



I bet members of Congress would love to have a retirement system like that too.  What a shame it doesn't exist:

"Members are eligible to start collecting at age 62 if they have at least five years of service. If they have 20 years of service under their belt, they can retire at 50. With 25 years of service, they can retire any time.


What they get depends on a formula based on years of service and average pay(natch, right?). So a congressman with 22 years of service and whose average salary for the top three years was $153,900 gets $84,645. A current congressman ending up with six years of service (it's two-year terms, after all) would get at least $16,503 (at age 62, of course).

In actuality, the average congressional pension payment ranges between $41,000 and $55,000, based on 2002 data from the Congressional Research Service."

Now, a retiring congressman isn't allowed to get more than 80 percent of their salary upon retirement. But after retiring, cost of living adjustments kick in, which can add substantially to the payment."

That's a fantastic plan, no doubt.  But it's not the retirement MstrDouglas said they get.  As to speaking fees....Name the last Congressman in your House district.  I.e., the one who preceded your current representative.  Can't name him/her?  Neither can I.  Nobody cares about Congressmen, and nobody's throwing speaking fees at them.


http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/20/commentary/wastler/wastler/index.htm



Toche, however i'd still like that retirement plan...considering "pension" collection from the private sector is pretty much a thing of the past *sigh*....25 years and retire at any time huh?...i'd be three years away from retirement and collecting a full pension..where's the justice? *wink & a smile*


_____________________________

That which yields is not always weak...

(in reply to selfbnd411)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise - 7/3/2007 9:46:42 AM   
SubinMaine


Posts: 1888
Joined: 1/7/2006
Status: offline
*edited* darn double post

< Message edited by SubinMaine -- 7/3/2007 9:47:18 AM >


_____________________________

That which yields is not always weak...

(in reply to selfbnd411)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> US House votes to give themselves a $4,400 pay raise Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094