RE: Money Slaves

RE: Money Slaves (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Mastermozilla -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 5:32:09 AM)
Im more worried of what the subs could find themselves in when in the end they may lose all their money to someone they have never met. Yes and I know there are many, im stating that and im not saying they are right or wrong im saying that what I want is a relationship where I can meet the person not an online relationship.

AquaticSub -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 5:58:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mastermozilla It also seems like some of the women doing this are ruining bdsm. Like lets say what if some male sub sees a girl online like on livejournal and shes asking for money. They never meet but he starts giving her his money. One day he wakes up and does not want to do this anymore but finds out all of his money is gone. Can he sue her or is it all his fault? Again... have you ever served a domme has a money slave? How do you know how many domme's would bleed a man dry? And.. for the record... submissives are not stupid, weak little things that need to be wrapped up in cotton. As a general rule, we have to the brain cells to rub together to realize that the house hasn't been paid yet. They aren't "ruining" this life any more than you are for making mistaken assumptions about this.

Mastermozilla -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:08:20 AM)
You make it sound like every domme that has a money slave is doing the best job possible thats just bull. What about the ones who say I will not talk to you unless you have 3 jobs. Is that really treating your sub fairly?

Rover -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:09:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mastermozilla You make it sound like every domme that has a money slave is doing the best job possible thats just bull. What about the ones who say I will not talk to you unless you have 3 jobs. Is that really treating your sub fairly? What does "fair" have to do within the context of a power exchange relationship? John

bandit25 -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:11:50 AM)
Darlin'...doms (and subs for that matter) can do whatever the hell they want. It's their lives. If you don't like it, don't be or have a money slave. Easy peasy. Rover is right, but don't forget, one can always walk away. It's not like anyone is forcing the other person to give the domme money. We're supposed to be adults here

Tristan -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:12:04 AM)
quote: lol... Hey Tristan... want me to forward the next one I get to you? hehe Sorry I couldn't help myself! They are out there, don't know about posting... but I have had a few at this site and others. I don't understand it... but I don't understand many things. Lockit, Just ask him to post. I've not seen a single money slave post on any of the boards. I don't read the boards every day, so I could be missing the posts. However, I see pleny of money dommes post so I suspect this might be more of a female fetish than a male fetish. It's also possible that the money slaves are embarassed or for some other reason are not posting. I was just curious. I've asked on other threads for some of the money slaves to post, and no one ever does. I would like to hear about the fetish from their prespective. Tristan

AquaticSub -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:12:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mastermozilla You make it sound like every domme that has a money slave is doing the best job possible thats just bull. What about the ones who say I will not talk to you unless you have 3 jobs. Is that really treating your sub fairly? If we are going to judge every aspect of BDSM by it's worst possible members and not it's usual, shall I start refering to you, the male supremacist, as another ignorant chavistionistic pig who can't make himself a sandwich and just wants a slave because he lacks the social skills to get laid? Not a reflection on you personally. I don't think you are that sort. But just making the point... if you want us to judge everything by it's worst members, fair treatment and all that.

AquaticSub -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:13:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rover quote: ORIGINAL: Mastermozilla You make it sound like every domme that has a money slave is doing the best job possible thats just bull. What about the ones who say I will not talk to you unless you have 3 jobs. Is that really treating your sub fairly? What does "fair" have to do within the context of a power exchange relationship? John Another excellent point...

MistressRouge -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:28:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bandit25 Darlin'...doms (and subs for that matter) can do whatever the hell they want. It's their lives. If you don't like it, don't be or have a money slave. Easy peasy. Rover is right, but don't forget, one can always walk away. It's not like anyone is forcing the other person to give the domme money. We're supposed to be adults here My thoughts exactly :). Subs are far from stupid, and have their own minds and ideals, just as Dom/mes do, why judge other people's fetishes and beliefs?

Lockit -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:34:38 AM)
Tristan, I would be interested in that as well...

Mastermozilla -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:39:02 AM)
Im also leaving this forum topic so good bye all. If you want to be angry at me just send me a message I will probably block you though.

sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:41:52 AM)
he has yet to really answer that question and it looks like we'll never know now

cjenny -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:44:44 AM)
From what I have seen he is simply trying to understand concepts unfamiliar to him, trying to open a dialogue about stuff. Why is that suddenly so wrong?

AquaticSub -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:45:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mastermozilla Im also leaving this forum topic so good bye all. If you want to be angry at me just send me a message I will probably block you though. Nobody is angry. Just trying to get you to look at this from an objective point of view. And personally, trying to get you to see that if you insist on judging the different parts of BDSM by it's worst members, the same courtesy will be extended to you.

AquaticSub -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:46:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cjenny From what I have seen he is simply trying to understand concepts unfamiliar to him, trying to open a dialogue about stuff. Why is that suddenly so wrong? Jenny, please look back. He understands that concept very well. He simply thinks it's wrong and, in his words "women doing this are ruining bdsm". Edited for an exact quote

cjenny -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:49:49 AM)
I did read it all but I still see it as someone feeling out a concept, someone trying to really understand something that they believe is wrong being a part of a healthy dynamic. Yeah yeah I have a permanent pair of rose colored glasses on....... but they look good on me [:D] and I don't plan to change them lol. Honestly I think he has been treated harshly for the wrong reasons.

bandit25 -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:52:22 AM)
jenny, I don't see anyone treating him harshly. I know you've read the other threads. He simply isn't very clear on what he is saying. Yes, he's young, but that really isn't any excuse. And when someone does answer, if it's not the answer he is looking for, he simply restates what he has said in the beginning. I'm all for people asking questions, etc., but to argue a point ad nauseum is pretty childish.

AquaticSub -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:56:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cjenny I did read it all but I still see it as someone feeling out a concept, someone trying to really understand something that they believe is wrong being a part of a healthy dynamic. Yeah yeah I have a permanent pair of rose colored glasses on....... but they look good on me [:D] and I don't plan to change them lol. Honestly I think he has been treated harshly for the wrong reasons. Well, generally, when someone is insulting about a topic they don't get handed a box of chocolates. I think he has been treated perfectly fairly as no one has stooped to insulting him the way he has those who engage in this.

Lockit -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 6:58:06 AM)
I was at fault here in a few ways. I was rude when he made no sense and when he was very unclear about many things. I mistaked him for someone else and combined the two people in my mind. I tried to get back on track with him and stick it out and he kept burying himself and I got rude right back at him. I am tired and overwhelmed and am correcting myself on this.

sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Money Slaves (6/30/2007 7:02:08 AM)
jenny, we explained in so many ways that if it wasn't his cup of tea, then why question someone else's kink just because he felt it wasn't "true" or the "right" relationship for a slave/submissive to have with their Domme ..since it was the "wrong" type of relationship to have. there are only so many ways you can explain that to a non open-minded, supremist 20yr old who blatantly refuses to listen to opposing opinions other than his own.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.328125