ExquisiteFeline
Posts: 124
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Evanesce quote:
I'm fairly new to this, but after reading a few posts, and considering my own experience, I'm curious if you think that competitiveness is one of the things that drives a switch to be what they are. It could be, but doesn't have to be. I'm competitive, to a point, but that has nothing to do with my being a switch. quote:
Switches seem to gravitate to games a means for determining their role in a session. I also know that for me, I prefer a partner that is very involved in the creativity aspect of all parts of a scene. It inspires me to be more creative. I also try to be a better sub or dom than my partner, and expect them to try to outdo me. What do you think? I think if that's what works for you, great! Personally, I don't play those games. My role, or position, is always the same. Barring orders to the contrary, I'm always on top, except with the Kaptin. Now that is the thing that I don't get with ppl who call themselves Doms or more likely subs... (I am not trying to be offensive, merely just thinking out loud and trying to understand...) "I'm always on top, except with the Kaptin." Whats with the defined role, but then EXCEPTIONS??? It is my understanding that you are one or the other, with no exceptions... that is why I personally say switch, however, I do tend to live out one role in sexuality more often that the other... How many sub profiles say, that they are sub only to one person, but Dom a whole heap of others? Aint that switchy behavior? Jeez going by that theory I am totally submissive...except for when I am not... Switching, to a switch, is not confusing, but it may be for me be if i defined myself to a role with exceptions... Take it in a work place environment perhaps, we submit to those above us, and lead those to whom we delegate, is that confusy? I have a feeling that it is not only some of the switchy's that are confused in their roles...
|