Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 4:30:46 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
It doh mek no difference to me wheer yum frum in America. Yo all tok funny to me.
E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to SubinMaine)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 4:33:35 AM   
SeeksOnlyOne


Posts: 2012
Joined: 5/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

It doh mek no difference to me wheer yum frum in America. Yo all tok funny to me.
E


lmfaooooooooo


_____________________________

it aint no good til it hurts just a little bit....jimmy somerville

in those moments of solitude, does everyone sometimes think they are insane? or is it just me?

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 4:49:51 AM   
SubinMaine


Posts: 1888
Joined: 1/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

It doh mek no difference to me wheer yum frum in America. Yo all tok funny to me.
E


*smile* no doubt! LOL!


_____________________________

That which yields is not always weak...

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 5:35:38 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
It's OK to call you 'whitey' because white people have never been oppressed, in all of history.
 
On topic though ... I mostly hate crime, when I get caught. Otherwise, makes no matter to me.

_____________________________

I wish I could buy back ...
the woman you stole.

(in reply to uwinceismile)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 5:39:18 AM   
CollarMaster1


Posts: 1
Joined: 7/18/2006
Status: offline
blacks were not the only people enslaved...thru history..virtually all people have been slaves at one time or another..blacks are merely the last...they need to get over it ..

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 5:44:27 AM   
SubinMaine


Posts: 1888
Joined: 1/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

It's OK to call you 'whitey' because white people have never been oppressed, in all of history.
 


i'm sure the above is tongue-in-cheek or, at the very least, sarcastic.

If the law says it is illegal to be discriminate due to race...then it should be illegal across the board. One group of people should not be valued more than the other.  Nor should they be afforded "tailored" rights.  This is what the African American population fought for in the 60's...EQUAL rights...EQUAL does not mean heavily favored, it means treated the same.


_____________________________

That which yields is not always weak...

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 6:22:27 AM   
instynctive


Posts: 2726
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
I moved here to Myrtle Beach, SC from New Hampshire 3 years ago and I love it here!
I find the "rebels" here very friendly.


I've been to MB... I certainly wouldn't consider that "The South".. lol

I'm talking the land of cotton, banjos and questionable relationships between siblings, not tourist towns or ... what was that called.. the "Redneck Riviera".. lol


_____________________________


Lifestyle-friendly web hosting and design: http://kinkyqueer.net

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 6:24:04 AM   
instynctive


Posts: 2726
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

It doh mek no difference to me wheer yum frum in America. Yo all tok funny to me.
E


The English have probably the most refined sense of humor... as do the "penal colonies"...

LOL

Thanks for the laugh, Lady E!


_____________________________


Lifestyle-friendly web hosting and design: http://kinkyqueer.net

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 8:36:19 AM   
Azriel308


Posts: 15
Joined: 4/4/2004
Status: offline
Your right, crime do cover more then just assualt and murder.  I was just using those two for examples since they are the ones most people associate with.  There is no reason to make other laws to cover some group or another, other to make the justice system a bigger mess then it is, and give someone a warm fuzzy since they supported a way to fight crime.  There where laws in place long before this garbage about hate crimes was around.  If you broke the law, you where punished.  Same crime, same punishment.  It is people like you who make people loose respect for others.  Specially when you think just becuase you look different you deserve special laws to protect you.  I used to work with some very good blacks, and we had many long discussions over the years on race and laws etc.  They agreed, there should be no difference on how someone is sentenced.  Least of all based on something like skin color or relgion etc.  The lady with the scales wears a blind fold for a reason, so she can't see things like that.   As for you calling others whitey and naive, get over yourself.  You and others like you are the reason I hated getting out of bed in the morning and going to work.  Always whining over being "picked on" or "profiled".  Never had anything to do with the fact they had just commited a crime or their prints where found someplace one had been committed.  Odd as well, they hated the other gang yet they where never sentenced under a hate crime law when they did something against that gang or group of people.  Must only work one way.  So much for equal rights.

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 9:24:44 AM   
zerosignal


Posts: 9
Joined: 6/13/2007
Status: offline
In my view, the central cause of racial double-standards enshrined in the law is, ironically, the misguided benevolence of sheltered white liberals.  Having lived and worked in some fairly "diverse" environments in my day, my experience has been that most minorities disapprove of the legal double-standards designed to benefit them such as "hate crime" laws or affirmative action.  The biggest proponents of both of those policies are privileged white liberals who have never had a meaningful interaction with a member of a minority social group in their lives. 

I'm going to take a small bit of rhetorical license at this point and make some generalized assumptions of my own with respect to these white liberals.  From my experiences with them, they seem plagued with "white guilt" over their social station and economic advantages, and commit themselves to crusading for equality to assauge those feelings.  But, like many members of every social group, these white liberals put unwavering faith in simple concepts to avoid having to struggle with more complex realities.  To wit, problems of socioeconomic disparity and historical (not present) institutionalized racism become a nebulous, indistinct conspiracy that lurks around every corner and must be stamped out at all costs.

Confirmation bias leads these white liberals to latch onto the small scraps of evidence in support of their worldview whenever they can find some, such as violent crimes against minority groups.  To liberals struggling with white guilt, these crimes stop being isolated incidents of violence or disorder, and become the very symbol of inequality in this country.  Naturally, such travesties need to be stamped out right away and thus we are left with laws that treat a crime of assault very differently, depending on what social groups the perpetrator and the victim belong to.

Of course, this fits perfectly with the worldview of liberals grappling with white guilt; they are already predisposed to seeing minorities as victims and whites as oppressors.  Such a simplification of social problems leads to the easy solution of giving the "victim" social group extra protections under the law.  And so, to at least answer the question posed in the title, I see hate crimes not as thought policing, but as institutionalizing a distorted view of society.

(in reply to Azriel308)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 9:42:24 AM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
quote:

...not as thought policing, but as institutionalizing a distorted view of society.


Po-tay-to, puh-tah-to...

(in reply to zerosignal)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 11:34:47 AM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn
It's OK to call you 'whitey' because white people have never been oppressed, in all of history.
 On topic though ... I mostly hate crime, when I get caught. Otherwise, makes no matter to me.


Have a read about the social conditions that "blue collar" types had to live thru' in 1850's UK. Same in the US I believe.
At a time when  the Industrial Revolution had resulted in bigger and "better" factories.
If thats not oppression then I dont know what it is.

Just read Zerosignal's post 110. Absolutely spot on and totally accurate IMO. In the UK these self same White Liberals hold rough white blue collar ie working class types in total contempt and seem completely unaware of their own double standards.

< Message edited by seeksfemslave -- 7/4/2007 11:42:06 AM >

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 11:41:10 AM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

It's OK to call you 'whitey' because white people have never been oppressed, in all of history.
 


Might want to go research the "white niggers of north america" or the Nazi purge of Jewish people or perhaps the Roman oppression of the Picts and Celts or perhaps the Serbian/Croatian/etc struggles before you make these infinitive statements.

So profoundly incorrect I hope you meant it tongue in cheek.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 1:22:16 PM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
... I hope you meant it tongue in cheek.


Ya think?

_____________________________

I wish I could buy back ...
the woman you stole.

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 1:42:38 PM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
~Fast Reply~

Everyone has the chance to be victim of a hate crime. Hate is not reserved soley for non-white skin, women and homosexuals. People have died for being Irish, Jewish, Catholic, Italian, Russian... Whatever.

I believe that murder is murder. However, it also sickens me that a person could get a lighter sentence for spraying hateful language about a religion, enthic group, or sexuality and not be punished more then whatever you get for tagging a building. Hate crime laws came into place so that juries wouldn't be as likely to go "He just killed a nigger/fag/jew/spick. They don't really matter." and I think they still have a place. Just not the same one. Murder is murder.

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 2:51:21 PM   
CrimsonMoan


Posts: 2652
Joined: 10/31/2006
From: Portland, Me via Las Vegas Nv
Status: offline
Ok been paying attention to this off and on, but heres my take on things hate crime laws can be a good and a bad thing and i feel they should be applied only when the motivation behind said crime is revealed. Some shit just happens and then some shit happens because there is extra motivation. Race and sexual preference play a big part in alot of the shit goes down. A guy gets beaten up outside of a bar, the guy behind it gets charged with assualt. Now if the victim had been gay would it be automatically a hate crime? Not in my book. Now if he got beaten up BECAUSE he was gay then yeah it becomes a hate crime. In legal terms its a motivating factor. But then i believe the door swings both ways.

A black teenager is on trial for the group assualt of a fellow white student follwing an incident in which after several black student sat under a tree where a majority oh white student spend lunch a noose was foudn haning from a branch. The ones repsonsible were found and dealt with. the victim in this case had NO connection to the incident other than being white. He was jumped from behind by a group of pissed of black youth, no is there a hate crime charge attached to this? No but it has become assualt with a deadly weapon because the victim was kicked and stomped on. If this was hte reverse the hate crome charge would have been there. Is this Right? Is this Fair? Fuck no, but thats the way of things

(in reply to AquaticSub)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 4:24:38 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Azriel308

Your right, crime do cover more then just assualt and murder.  I was just using those two for examples since they are the ones most people associate with.  There is no reason to make other laws to cover some group or another, other to make the justice system a bigger mess then it is, and give someone a warm fuzzy since they supported a way to fight crime.  There where laws in place long before this garbage about hate crimes was around.  If you broke the law, you where punished.  Same crime, same punishment.  It is people like you who make people loose respect for others.  Specially when you think just becuase you look different you deserve special laws to protect you.  I used to work with some very good blacks, and we had many long discussions over the years on race and laws etc.  They agreed, there should be no difference on how someone is sentenced.  Least of all based on something like skin color or relgion etc.  The lady with the scales wears a blind fold for a reason, so she can't see things like that.   As for you calling others whitey and naive, get over yourself.  You and others like you are the reason I hated getting out of bed in the morning and going to work.  Always whining over being "picked on" or "profiled".  Never had anything to do with the fact they had just committed a crime or their prints where found someplace one had been committed.  Odd as well, they hated the other gang yet they where never sentenced under a hate crime law when they did something against that gang or group of people.  Must only work one way.  So much for equal rights.


Very interesting and incredibly well written if I made add.....Wow!!!

Well let me tell you a thing or two Mr snippity...I have worked with "some very good whites" and we would have long discussions on race and their inability to dance and why they smelled like wet dogs.....But anywhoo back on topic....I have never worked with any "good whites"...I lied.

I believe the topic is hate crimes so let's see how our friend conducts an argument......Hmmm...Because of people like me he hated going to work....Yadda yadda yadda..He has worked with some "good blacks"...I'm sure they were ecstatic to receive you approval....Coming from such a lazy guy who doesn't like to get up and go to work.
I've always wined about getting picked on and profiled.....This is a thread about hate crimes???? Right?  ....Ummm ...Ooooh this thought is kind of special....People like me complain about my prints being found where a crime has been committed....And he continues by saying that people, like me, who get into gang fights should be charged with a hate crime.
 
That was fun!.....Cool beans!....ok Azriel...First off, you need to read the definition as to what a hate crime actually encompasses...Please read up on a subject before you post so that we can avoid these uncomfortable situations where your lack of knowledge on the particular subject that you are addressing does not cast you in a particularly positive light....And ya' aint gonna get no pussy in that kind of lighting....it's not applicable to the guy who shoots his neighbor that he can't stand....They have a beef...dog shit in his yard....Or he banged his wife and daughter...See, he may hate his neighbor but it doesn't meet the definition of a hate crime.

read up....Come back and post....It was lovely speaking with you....I'm sure the majority of "whiteys" feel exactly the same as you.....God I hope not!!!

_____________________________



(in reply to Azriel308)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 4:39:34 PM   
Invictus754


Posts: 521
Joined: 12/16/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

It's OK to call you 'whitey' because white people have never been oppressed, in all of history.


You are not at all familiar with Roman history, are you?  They enslaved the WHITE people who inhabited Europe as they expanded the empire.  White people were in chains 2000 years ago.

_____________________________

You never know your limits, until you push them
If slavery is a gift, the Africans were pretty fucking generous in the 1700 and 1800s, weren't they?

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 4:45:18 PM   
CrimsonMoan


Posts: 2652
Joined: 10/31/2006
From: Portland, Me via Las Vegas Nv
Status: offline
just about every race and culture has been on the bottom of the totem pole

(in reply to Invictus754)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? - 7/4/2007 4:58:49 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zerosignal

In my view, the central cause of racial double-standards enshrined in the law is, ironically, the misguided benevolence of sheltered white liberals.  Having lived and worked in some fairly "diverse" environments in my day, my experience has been that most minorities disapprove of the legal double-standards designed to benefit them such as "hate crime" laws or affirmative action.  The biggest proponents of both of those policies are privileged white liberals who have never had a meaningful interaction with a member of a minority social group in their lives. 

I'm going to take a small bit of rhetorical license at this point and make some generalized assumptions of my own with respect to these white liberals.  From my experiences with them, they seem plagued with "white guilt" over their social station and economic advantages, and commit themselves to crusading for equality to assauge those feelings.  But, like many members of every social group, these white liberals put unwavering faith in simple concepts to avoid having to struggle with more complex realities.  To wit, problems of socioeconomic disparity and historical (not present) institutionalized racism become a nebulous, indistinct conspiracy that lurks around every corner and must be stamped out at all costs.

Confirmation bias leads these white liberals to latch onto the small scraps of evidence in support of their worldview whenever they can find some, such as violent crimes against minority groups.  To liberals struggling with white guilt, these crimes stop being isolated incidents of violence or disorder, and become the very symbol of inequality in this country.  Naturally, such travesties need to be stamped out right away and thus we are left with laws that treat a crime of assault very differently, depending on what social groups the perpetrator and the victim belong to.

Of course, this fits perfectly with the worldview of liberals grappling with white guilt; they are already predisposed to seeing minorities as victims and whites as oppressors.  Such a simplification of social problems leads to the easy solution of giving the "victim" social group extra protections under the law.  And so, to at least answer the question posed in the title, I see hate crimes not as thought policing, but as institutionalizing a distorted view of society.



Since you are an attorney...Is this the argument that you would make in a courtroom defending a white person accused of a hate crime?...That the only reason we could possibly be here is because of "white guilt" and "sheltered white liberals.?" 

To quote Belushi "Seven years of college down the drain!"...Are you saying that there are never any crimes that are based sole on race and sexual preference or so few that only white liberals could dare notice?  Maybe you should google the numbers, Mr attorney, or have one of your clerks do it for you.

One of the aspects of America is that we are supposed to be tolerant...you know huddled masses and all...So when a crime is committed that is based solely on race...sexual preference..etc....it becomes all the more heinous...And should be dealt with accordingly.

A hate crime is a hate crime...blacks have been charged with hate crimes against whites....the difference is that you will never hear about it in the media because it doesn't wag the dog.

When a crime is committed for no apparent motive other than race...We live in a country that simply will not tolerate such actions and we make it clear by installing the language of hate crimes.

Nothing is perfect....I'm sure there are cases where a person was tried for a hate crime that "hate" was not a motivation for the incident.  

Out of curiosity, my uber conservative attorney friend, what exactly are the more "complex realities" of a hate crime.

You can bill me by the hour.


< Message edited by domiguy -- 7/4/2007 5:00:39 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to zerosignal)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: HATE CRIMES = thought policing? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.113