CuriousLord -> RE: If you were a Science Teacher.... (12/31/2007 5:09:18 PM)
More than weird, but scary! Terrorfying, in some respects.
Part of me rather hopes that the physics which these measurements are taken off of is debased, or surifficiently revised.
I rather do like the balloon analogy, though. As the surface area- the very particles on an ideal, thin balloon- stretch apart as it expands, this analogy does correspond with the expanding universe so far as I can see.
FullCircle -> RE: If you were a Science Teacher.... (12/31/2007 5:15:47 PM)
quote:
ORIGINAL: bipolarber You are a little larger than you were a moment ago... weird, huh?
Are you questioning my diet[8|]
Rule -> RE: If you were a Science Teacher.... (12/31/2007 5:20:35 PM)
lol [:D]
samboct -> RE: If you were a Science Teacher.... (12/31/2007 5:23:59 PM)
Full Circle's numbers seem to gybe with the 'net- the universe is 156 billion light years wide, but 13.7 billion years old. This means that the universe has to have expanded at 11.7c (c = the speed of light), if the expansion were linear. Since most of this expansion happened in the inflation- the inflation must have occurred at some multiple of 11.7c since no star is moving away from any other star at more than c- I suspect that it's a fraction of c. Look at the bright side- finally an example in nature that shows that faster than light travel has to be possible.
Sam
Griswold -> RE: If you were a Science Teacher.... (12/31/2007 7:18:34 PM)
quote:
ORIGINAL: popeye1250
...how would you try to explain to a class just how big in human terms that the Universe is? I mean as good as you could and trying to put it on a scale that humans could understand.
Well....
It's bigger than big...and well...uhhhmmm...it's large....