Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Outgrowing BDSM


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Outgrowing BDSM Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Outgrowing BDSM - 7/13/2007 9:04:13 PM   
NefertariReborn


Posts: 381
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TigerNINTails

quote:

ORIGINAL: raynchk

Putting the above thought into the realm of bdsm, I wonder if the growth that comes from roleplay, the acting out of fantasies and having needs met transports one to a place where D/s relationships are no longer necessary.



Speaking for myself, my slave, and those that I've trained (at least during their training),  the dynamics generated between two or more people in that effort are far from role play. While we might be in a role, within that dynamic, I, for one, am not playing that role. I am that. Period. It's an important distinction to make.

This is a very deep seated and necessary aspect of the way that I live. Or prefer to live, in times when I must put some of it aside. It's not a place I've put myself in, but rather a way of being that comes from within.

Having your needs met, actually, from my experience, reinforces and inexorably binds the lifestyle into every aspect of someones being. It isn't something that will simply transport you to a place where the dynamics you've grown used to will simply disappear suddenly.

In fact, I'd gather that, from my experience, the more you experience it, the more you partake of anothers service, devotion, offerings, pain, pleasure and dedication, the more you will find it wraps itself through you, and the more you will need it. And want it. The more you do it, the more you internalize it.

Keep in mind, I'm saying "you", not because I pretend to know what "you" want, but rather in a general sense, for any reading. As with all things, some will relate to this, some will not.

So, to me, it's not about something that I do, but rather something that I am. I am a BDSMer. I'm comfortable owning women. I'm a sadist. I'm a guide. I'm a trainer. I'm a slut even. Above all, I'm a human being. All these things will be with me probably beyond death, and I highly doubt I'll be transported to a plane where a D/s or M/s dynamic is no longer necessary. Well, maybe once I die, but that's besides the point.

As it's been said by others, in their own ways... I'll say it in mine... There is no way in hell I could do without this, any more than I could do without eating, breathing, dreaming or any of the other myriad things that I do without concious thought, or question.

So that said, when it comes down to it, some will eventually come to a point where they will walk away from it.

For me, that will never happen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: raynchk

Do you eventually outgrow all this stuff or does the 'rope work' just become more intricate and complex along with our partners? Simplistically: Once a Master/dom/sub/slave always a Master/dom/sub/slave?



Out grow it? LOL! Are you kiddin me?! Hahahahaa! Hell no. And I really can't tell you if the people get more complicated, but as times change, so do peoples values and view points. But my rope work has gotten a bit more intricate, or complicated over the years.

Now if you're talking about the framework of my relationships... No... That hasn't gotten more complicated... It's refined, but that's for simplicities sake, not complication.

So to me, yes, once a Master, always a Master. Just because you owned a dog once and don't now, doesn't make you less of a pet owner or dog lover. Once a human, after all, always a human.

My inclinations and attractions to this way of life are very significantly interwoven deeply into my very being, so far as I can tell. I can't imagine being without them. I've been this way as long as I can remember, damn near. I don't plan on that differing just cause I get old and grey.

quote:

ORIGINAL: raynchk

I know that being human has to do with growth and development, with learning about oneself and others, eventually exchanging one set of challenges for another more complex set of challgenges -- and eventually -- one would hope, resulting in a mellowing of the spirit and an appreciation for what one encounters along the way.



This confuses me... Why would one hope that the spirit mellows? I for one hope my spirit continues to rage against the night, while developing a deep, deep, deep appreciation for everything that I encounter along the way.

To me, a mellowing spirit would seem to be one that has resigned to complacency. Just a thought.

But I agree... Part of being human is about growth and development, both in ourselves, and our relationships with others.

So that said, even if ones enlightened... Why would they step down their natural human inclinations of maintaining that contact with other human beings? I know I wouldn't. That I can say with absolute certainty. No matter how satisfied I was being by myself. Or within myself. Or whatever.

And yet again, Tiger strikes with yet one more small book. I guess I'm just not cut out to express something in a few words. Peace.

TNT



I enjoy all of your posts, especially the one about your sub and her disability.  I would hope that you never "outgrow" a relationship like that. 

(in reply to TigerNINTails)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Outgrowing BDSM - 7/13/2007 9:07:51 PM   
NefertariReborn


Posts: 381
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dawntreader

quote:

ORIGINAL: raynchk


I have a theory/belief that comes from C'han Buddhism. It goes something like this: when one achieves enlightenment (or self realization) there is a blending of the yin and yang energies and one becomes fully self-contained. The need for relationships (with the same or opposite sex) is gone, and one is left to experience the internal bliss of meditation and cavorting with internal archetypical energies of the psyche or *God* realization as some choose to describe it.


Answering from a Daoist point of view, self-containment is not enlightenment and while "need" for physical relationships may eventual transfer to "desire" as one becomes enlightened, i feel it enhances the physical enteractment between individuals particularly in D/s. Speaking from a personal standpoint...my spiritual beliefs enhance my BDSM activities to the point that neither exists without the other~


And I'll chime in from a Judeo/Christian point of view ( why should We be left out lol!) It's not good for man/woman to live alone.  Think G-d had it on the button then, but then G-d usually does.  And yes My JC background does enhance My BDSM activities.  Just ask Me about watersports and baptism.  Very spiritual. 

(in reply to dawntreader)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Outgrowing BDSM - 7/13/2007 9:18:19 PM   
michaelOfGeorgia


Posts: 4253
Status: offline
after years of continued searching, i'm getting used to the idea that i will never be owned. i mainly use CM as a meeting place to make friends, that's probably all  i'll ever be able to achieve.

_____________________________

Are we having fun, yet?

(in reply to raynchk)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Outgrowing BDSM - 7/14/2007 4:28:09 AM   
dasein42


Posts: 44
Joined: 5/30/2007
Status: offline
Point one, if you're going to be influenced by something, have the decency to either try to understand it, or try to hide it.

Point two, since there is a lot of evidence that those in the east who do understand their own traditions (sadly gettting fewer and fewer yearly) think very little of westerners' claims to any understanding of them, I'm going to avoid any buddhist, taoist, new age or old enlightenment arguments and talk from western conceptions.

The clearest thing in western philosophy that has been said on this subject is the Lord/Bondsman dialectic in Hegel, part of the Phenomenology of Spirit. In this dialectic the master / slave opposition eventually has to be sublated into a relationship of mutual cooperation, because recognition by a slave is eventually unsatisfying to the master, and doesn't confirm his self-consciousness. The slave, on the other hand, has already progressed into a self-recognising subject through his manipulation of nature in working an object, i.e. labour.

So what does this say for people in a D/s lifestyle? The dynamic and the possible resolution are interesting but the resolution Hegel comes up with is , for me, unsatisfying. As a political and economic resolution it has proven ephemeral, slaves progressed to wage slaves and the master to the pseudo mastery of the bourgeois, leaving neither in a position to even satisfy the immediate need for recognition that creates the master/slave dialectic to begin with.

In a personal relationship, then, my current thinking is that the current economic and political lack of either true mastery or true submission leads to a craving for these things, according to one's tendencies as a dominant, submissive, or switch. Open acknowledgement of what is unsaid in many if not most personal relationships opens up the possibility of a first dialogue between the master and slave, of the first, and ultimately most satisfying available, mutual recognition as the same and as other.

Hegel's "optimism", which is fundamental to a thinker that sees man as intrinsically infinite Spirit, leads him to believe in a historical, economic, political and ulimately permanent answer to the dialectic. But if we remain what we only know ourselves to be, that is finite, limited and mortal, getting to, going through, and getting "beyond" the Master / slave situation is a matter for repetition. Immediately as we move beyond it we fall back to the immediacy of sense-certainty, the deception of perception, the ignorance of consciousness, and the burgeoning development of self-consciousness that gives rise to this situation, and this dialectic in the first place. Non masters, non slaves are not "free" except in the same way that Masters and slaves are free, that they can choose to continue or not. Vanilla folk just "think" they are free, when in truth they haven't yet developed to the point where slavery or Mastery begins.


_____________________________

Mitdasein
House of Daedalus
http://dominationandmastery.blogspot.com/

(in reply to MzMia)
Profile   Post #: 44
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Outgrowing BDSM Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.062