welshwmn3
Posts: 126
Joined: 3/14/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: womanworshipper The question arose because i was serving at a party held by my former Mistress recently (with the consent of my current Owner but not in her presence) and attracted the interest of another Lady. When it came to light that i was already owned, the Lady suggested it might be advisable for me to carry some sort of mark of ownership to prevent any misunderstandings. We/we discussed it and liked the idea. Having something that will only mean anything to Us/us, therefore, would defeat the object. Incidentally, i was only seeking suggestions for the type or means of signification; the final choice will, of course, be made by Madam. It seems that in a case like that, if somebody who doesn't know your status is 'interested' and you know it, letting her know right away that you are owned is a good thing. For that, you don't need a mark of ownership. A lot of people have things that only mean something to them. My collar for my primary Sir is an anklet that he made me. My collar for my secondary Sir is a silver bracelet. I wear both those collars at all times, yet even in a BDSM setting, nobody would know either of those were my collars. There's nothing on either that says, "submissive" or "slave" or in anyway denotes I'm collared. I think it's interesting that (from the way I read your explanation) the woman did not have the courtesy to ask you if you were in fact collared/owned already, and then decided to cover up her gaff by saying you should have something signifying your status. (Of course, I may be reading more into your explanation than is there.)
|