Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Bound vs Unbound


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> Bound vs Unbound Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 6:52:02 AM   
skareamoos


Posts: 46
Joined: 5/13/2005
Status: offline
I have been somewhat surprised to learn that in some rather strong relationships, bondage is not a part of play.  Ihave always felt the need (and the desire) to employ it, regardless of whether I was currently bottoming or topping.  Perhaps "need" is too strong a term, but fantasy and reality blend more readily when the bonds are inescapable.  I suppose I might interject this into almost any  Message Board section, but being for right or wrong, I deposit it here.  How many agree, how many disagree, and any explanations would be appreciated.

(I'm just a typical overaged, geriatric, lust-crazed degenerate.)
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 6:57:13 AM   
earthycouple


Posts: 4462
Joined: 2/19/2006
Status: offline
If I had my way my slave would live in some sort of rope all the time....so would I.  I am a fiend for MFP and the pretty of it.  It simply is not feasable to always take the time to apply rope (especially in the form of bondage) since I am part of a family of 4.  I make concessions where I have to so I can enjoy life to the fullest.

_____________________________

D~

Seeking, searching, hoping, living, loving, jumping. So what's new with you?

(in reply to skareamoos)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 7:18:09 AM   
SlaveSubtoserve


Posts: 282
Joined: 6/21/2006
Status: offline
....i agree as i feel the need for on-going bondage to ideally help my sub/slave juices flow smoothly and continuously..

(in reply to earthycouple)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 7:44:44 AM   
littlesarbonn


Posts: 1710
Joined: 12/3/2005
From: Stockton, California
Status: offline
I discovered to my chagrin that way too many women who were interested in D/s relationships with me weren't interested in bondage, but in "how can you serve me without me having to do anything D/s related". I know it sounds kind of bizarre, but I really think some kind of change in the waters has happened because I can't even describe the amount of times that I found myself entering a relationship that seemed vanilla plus, more than D/s lite. And then it was always thrown back at me when I started to protest and say, "isn't there going to be any actual D/s": "You're a submissive, so you should accept whatever it is I desire." Then I would be told about how many submissive men are contacting them on a daily basis, that I should be overjoyed just to be in their presence and having gotten past their screening mechanisms.

So, I generally just left. And it would usually cause a call of "Why did you leave? I thought this was what you wanted!"

I think there's a real disconnect in the scene these days that no one recognizes because they're all so tied (without the ropes) to the scene that they don't even see the sea change that has taken place. Way too often, the "problem" is thrown right back at me, as if it's my problem that I can't seem to find what I'm seeking, when a decade ago, people seemed to be so much different in the scene and in what they were seeking.

It's why I stopped looking and changed my profile to be searching for cheese instead of a mistress. I've never been led astray by a slice of cheese. Well, once, but I'm not getting into that now.


_____________________________

<---- FYI, this picture looks JUST like me


http://www.littlesarbonn.com/Stickman/Stickman.htm
The Adventures of Stickman and the Unemployed Lego Spaceman

(in reply to skareamoos)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 7:51:43 AM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline

There have been times when I thought I should "relabel myself" (I guess "re position myself" is better, from a marketing standpoint for those who read marketing crap) as a "bondage top" instead of a domina.  When given a choice, I would enter in a bdsm top relationship with a bondage bottom more readily than a submissive than had a hard limit of any kind of restraint (there would be no connection there).  Bondage for me is the foundation of my entire kink - it's the only non negotiable, "must have" for me.

So much so that I rarely even mention it, it's just a given.  If I represented my bondage fetish as much as I think about it, or how much weight I put on it in my BDSM world, I would be talking about it non stop.

A day will not go by that I do not engage in bondage, or at least view men in bondage (grin) as a form of self stimulation if I am not doing it myself.  There's nothing HOTTER!

Akasha


_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to skareamoos)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 7:54:27 AM   
came4U


Posts: 3572
Joined: 1/23/2007
From: London, Ontario
Status: offline
bondage of any sort (yum) would imply trust and devotion...otherwise we are just a bunch of people who want to be bossed or boss someone around blaa dull.

gimme tight or loose chains around me anyday, or I would walk away like an alziemers patient drawn to some unknown time and space. gone!

but, not just anyone can put another in bondage either. Been shackled going to jail, lol that was no funners. It wasn't for my own benefit but their safety. HA.

but feeling as I do now..I would bite through 1/4 inch iron. lol




(in reply to littlesarbonn)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 8:58:13 AM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
I think mutual desire for and work on maintaining the authority of the dynamic is the most necessary thing.

For many of us some symbol of slavery is important -- Fox had necklaces and collars before we got both his ears pierced. Now those hole and any earrings he wears are a sign of my authority over him.

Bondage can be very fun for him and it can be useful or artistic from my view. There is no way I could using it 24/7 however.

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to skareamoos)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 9:02:08 AM   
cleaningsub


Posts: 34
Joined: 6/26/2007
Status: offline
i got interested in bdsm because of bondage.  i am learning that there is so much more to it.  i think that bondage may just be a tool that Doms/Dommes can use as part of submission.  When you are bound you can't help but be submissive.  Of course you have probably already submitted by the time you get to the trust level that being in bondage would take

On another note.  i have heard that some Doms/Dommes make their subs wear rope under their clothes as a reminder of submission.  Then of course there are the chastity devices.  i haven't tied any yet but i would think that would be an interesting reminder.

al


(in reply to came4U)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 9:33:49 AM   
goddessAVA


Posts: 221
Joined: 11/2/2006
Status: offline
I just started to absolutely fall in love with rope bondage-it is so intimate and sensual.  Before I used leather restraints more because I was not much of a fuss around with knots and pretty patterns for 45 minutes type gal, but now I could spend hours just binding and rebinding...........
I must say I find the idea that there is a list of must do bdsm activities is silly-your interests either match or they do not.   If a moody, capricious, everchanging Domme is not what you want, I think it would be easy to ascertain that early on in the relationship. 

_____________________________

Philadelphia's premier Enema Nurse
cleaning out America's assholes one at a time

(in reply to cleaningsub)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 10:33:42 AM   
MisPandora


Posts: 2911
Joined: 4/7/2004
From: Philadelphia, PA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: skareamoos

I have been somewhat surprised to learn that in some rather strong relationships, bondage is not a part of play.  Ihave always felt the need (and the desire) to employ it, regardless of whether I was currently bottoming or topping.  Perhaps "need" is too strong a term, but fantasy and reality blend more readily when the bonds are inescapable.  I suppose I might interject this into almost any  Message Board section, but being for right or wrong, I deposit it here.  How many agree, how many disagree, and any explanations would be appreciated.

(I'm just a typical overaged, geriatric, lust-crazed degenerate.)

Bondage is just one of the many "options" we have in our lifestyle.  Not everyone is into it.  Not everyone employs corporal in their kink either.

As for your question, I don't see what we need to agree or disagree on.  You didn't really pose anything but a personal statement of what you need.

_____________________________

Pandora
Ms World Leather 2004
Ms Philadelphia Leather 2004

"Simply put, if you want a real femdom to love you, give her reasons to love you." Gloria Brame

(in reply to skareamoos)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 10:37:26 AM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn

I discovered to my chagrin that way too many women who were interested in D/s relationships with me weren't interested in bondage, but in "how can you serve me without me having to do anything D/s related". I know it sounds kind of bizarre, but I really think some kind of change in the waters has happened because I can't even describe the amount of times that I found myself entering a relationship that seemed vanilla plus, more than D/s lite. And then it was always thrown back at me when I started to protest and say, "isn't there going to be any actual D/s": "You're a submissive, so you should accept whatever it is I desire." Then I would be told about how many submissive men are contacting them on a daily basis, that I should be overjoyed just to be in their presence and having gotten past their screening mechanisms.

So, I generally just left. And it would usually cause a call of "Why did you leave? I thought this was what you wanted!"

I think there's a real disconnect in the scene these days that no one recognizes because they're all so tied (without the ropes) to the scene that they don't even see the sea change that has taken place. Way too often, the "problem" is thrown right back at me, as if it's my problem that I can't seem to find what I'm seeking, when a decade ago, people seemed to be so much different in the scene and in what they were seeking.

It's why I stopped looking and changed my profile to be searching for cheese instead of a mistress. I've never been led astray by a slice of cheese. Well, once, but I'm not getting into that now.



Don't blame "the scene" - instead work on clearer communication and be clear about your needs and expecations.  The more a submissive prides himself in being a "service sub" and less he talks about his interest in kink, the more people are going to assume he really doesn't have any fetishes or kinks.  It also opens the doors for people who really aren't that kinky, but are attracted to the idea of having a 'no strings' relationship with someone who will do stuff for them.  You have talked before about being in relationships where the woman uses you for errands or tasks or whatever but never anything intimate or romantic. If this is your problem over and over again, stop blaming other people and start establishing YOUR expectations.  If people are continually attracted to you for the wrong reasons, what wrong signals are sending?

Work on figuring out how you can communicate about your kinky needs without sounding like a needy bottom. There are ways to do it.  It's volatile for subs trying to navigate this path because they get unfairly trounced on and called a "bottom" for merely expressing a need; savvy femdoms will see through this though and can separate the needy wannabe guys from those that are submissive but desire a structure that includes kink.

Akasha


_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to littlesarbonn)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 10:39:30 AM   
skareamoos


Posts: 46
Joined: 5/13/2005
Status: offline
Need to agree or disagree?  Not at all.  But for more than the roughly 60 years that I have been trying to understand this strange deviation which in some respects we share, I have continually inquired.  Any insight is helpful, and I thank all who have responded.

(in reply to MisPandora)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 10:39:49 AM   
lachlann


Posts: 9
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline
For me bondage is the ONE thing that actually slows me down in my ever hectic days. This is first and foremost the reason that I "embrace" it as a form of submission. It helps me to focus and be in the moment, and gets me out of my head from the goings on of the day.

On a much deeper level it represents true surrender for me. Allowing myself to be bound by a Domme is the truest form of trust I can think of in the D/s exchange. I won't just go to somebody I have never met and allow them to bind me - it just won't happen. But once that connection is truly there, allowing myself to be bound for my Domme's pleasure is a visual and literal form of my submission to her.

Bondage for me is freedom.

(in reply to goddessAVA)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 1:15:54 PM   
littlesarbonn


Posts: 1710
Joined: 12/3/2005
From: Stockton, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn

I discovered to my chagrin that way too many women who were interested in D/s relationships with me weren't interested in bondage, but in "how can you serve me without me having to do anything D/s related". I know it sounds kind of bizarre, but I really think some kind of change in the waters has happened because I can't even describe the amount of times that I found myself entering a relationship that seemed vanilla plus, more than D/s lite. And then it was always thrown back at me when I started to protest and say, "isn't there going to be any actual D/s": "You're a submissive, so you should accept whatever it is I desire." Then I would be told about how many submissive men are contacting them on a daily basis, that I should be overjoyed just to be in their presence and having gotten past their screening mechanisms.

So, I generally just left. And it would usually cause a call of "Why did you leave? I thought this was what you wanted!"

I think there's a real disconnect in the scene these days that no one recognizes because they're all so tied (without the ropes) to the scene that they don't even see the sea change that has taken place. Way too often, the "problem" is thrown right back at me, as if it's my problem that I can't seem to find what I'm seeking, when a decade ago, people seemed to be so much different in the scene and in what they were seeking.

It's why I stopped looking and changed my profile to be searching for cheese instead of a mistress. I've never been led astray by a slice of cheese. Well, once, but I'm not getting into that now.



Don't blame "the scene" - instead work on clearer communication and be clear about your needs and expecations.  The more a submissive prides himself in being a "service sub" and less he talks about his interest in kink, the more people are going to assume he really doesn't have any fetishes or kinks.  It also opens the doors for people who really aren't that kinky, but are attracted to the idea of having a 'no strings' relationship with someone who will do stuff for them.  You have talked before about being in relationships where the woman uses you for errands or tasks or whatever but never anything intimate or romantic. If this is your problem over and over again, stop blaming other people and start establishing YOUR expectations.  If people are continually attracted to you for the wrong reasons, what wrong signals are sending?

Work on figuring out how you can communicate about your kinky needs without sounding like a needy bottom. There are ways to do it.  It's volatile for subs trying to navigate this path because they get unfairly trounced on and called a "bottom" for merely expressing a need; savvy femdoms will see through this though and can separate the needy wannabe guys from those that are submissive but desire a structure that includes kink.

Akasha



That's an old argument based on a past that isn't relevant anymore. I'm very direct in what I'm seeking and what I'm willing to put into such a relationship these days. So, yes, I stand behind what I said about how people in the scene have changed, not that "the scene" has changed. Big difference there. People have a different perception of what constitutes a D/s relationship these days than they did in the past. I know this because I run into this all the time. Doesn't mean there's anything wrong with it; it just means that the direction the people in the scene took is different than what makes me comfortable. Thus, the reason why I am a lot more guarded in becoming involved with people than I ever have. But yes, I still run into people who are interested in my service, but not in me serving. It's kind of like someone who seeks out whatever she can get without putting that much effort into the search. If I blame anyone, I blame the Internet and the laziness that the medium creates. People want instant gratification without actually having to build relationships. That's a big part of what has changed with the people in the scene, but not the scene itself. There are still people who continue on as they've always continued on, but I feel they're incapable of seeing what's going on around them with the new generation of Internet bdsm people who have come along (by new generation, that doesn't necessarily mean it involves age).

The fact still exists that I am a service submissive and I've always been one. But I'm not a butler or some guy that likes to dress like a French maid and gets his thrills out of dusting a shelf. In EVERY conversation I have had with women about this, I indicate that while I am a service submissive, and yes, I am, I do it because I desire to be a useful part of her life, not some outside cleaning service that shows up, cleans and then disappears. I give detailed information about how I serve a woman because I am attracted to her, her brain and the fact that she is dominant and dominant to me. This "you need to establish your expectations" is not even an issue. I do that wholeheartedly. But when someone comes into the relationship with a sense of "what can I get out of this with the least amount of effort" BECAUSE they see this discussed constantly on message boards where someone indicates that he or she gets ALL of his or her pleasure from cleaning and having no involvement, establishing your expectations almost becomes irrelevant because there's an expectation from her that because someone who may be lying his ass off on a message board becomes the STANDARD for what she begins to expect from me, WITHOUT ONCE discussing that with me.

You see, I realized what my problem was (we had talked about this before) and I went forth and put forth the effort of fixing that. What I discovered was that it wasn't really just me that was causing the problems I kept running into. EVEN WITH the work I did to make sure there would NEVER be any type of miscommunication or missing information, it STILL happens, which indicates to me that like with all science, when an error keeps happening and you've already adjusted the variables, it's quite possible that the variables are outside the system.

So, my belief in this situation is that you are continuing to argue based on a past that has been seriously changed in the present by me. I don't usually ask for advice, receive really good advice, acknowledge it was really good advice, and then blow it off. I put forth serious changes to circumvent and plow through these problems I was having. Turns out, the problems can sometimes be external.


_____________________________

<---- FYI, this picture looks JUST like me


http://www.littlesarbonn.com/Stickman/Stickman.htm
The Adventures of Stickman and the Unemployed Lego Spaceman

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 6:13:37 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn

I discovered to my chagrin that way too many women who were interested in D/s relationships with me weren't interested in bondage, but in "how can you serve me without me having to do anything D/s related". I know it sounds kind of bizarre, but I really think some kind of change in the waters has happened because I can't even describe the amount of times that I found myself entering a relationship that seemed vanilla plus, more than D/s lite. And then it was always thrown back at me when I started to protest and say, "isn't there going to be any actual D/s": "You're a submissive, so you should accept whatever it is I desire." Then I would be told about how many submissive men are contacting them on a daily basis, that I should be overjoyed just to be in their presence and having gotten past their screening mechanisms.

So, I generally just left. And it would usually cause a call of "Why did you leave? I thought this was what you wanted!"

I think there's a real disconnect in the scene these days that no one recognizes because they're all so tied (without the ropes) to the scene that they don't even see the sea change that has taken place. Way too often, the "problem" is thrown right back at me, as if it's my problem that I can't seem to find what I'm seeking, when a decade ago, people seemed to be so much different in the scene and in what they were seeking.

It's why I stopped looking and changed my profile to be searching for cheese instead of a mistress. I've never been led astray by a slice of cheese. Well, once, but I'm not getting into that now.



For what it's worth, I tend to agree with you. There seems to be a lot of people these days (especially female dominants) who are into very non-BDSM relationships, yet they call it D/s. It's actually all s, and damn little D. They expect a sub to willingly serve in any way the domme desires, without the domme having to do anything at all to make it happen. The prevalence of this attitude seems to be on the rise, and I suspect it's a simple case of people simply jumping onto the bandwagon.

(in reply to littlesarbonn)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 6:33:38 PM   
BlindDescent


Posts: 113
Joined: 9/26/2006
Status: offline
As we all know, bondage comes in many forms and in a host of formats. I also prefer to see my woman in some form of containment whenever possible. I find that for a continuous method of touch; I create a personal macramee wristlet, necklace or anklet to remind her who she belongs to. She knows I have kissed each knot with her name while weaving my essence into it. The greatest aspect of relationships here have to do with creativity infused with private meaning. Small touches often last longer than expected; and nothing is done without being noticed.
 

_____________________________

Reality is what you create; not what others leave behind.

(in reply to hardbodysub)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 8:25:08 PM   
MisPandora


Posts: 2911
Joined: 4/7/2004
From: Philadelphia, PA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: skareamoos

Need to agree or disagree?  Not at all.  But for more than the roughly 60 years that I have been trying to understand this strange deviation which in some respects we share, I have continually inquired.  Any insight is helpful, and I thank all who have responded.

Perhaps you forgot that your OP *asked* for: "How many agree, how many disagree, and any explanations would be appreciated."  My point was -- there was nothing to agree or disagree on.  What you like, you like.  Who am I to say you're right or wrong?????


_____________________________

Pandora
Ms World Leather 2004
Ms Philadelphia Leather 2004

"Simply put, if you want a real femdom to love you, give her reasons to love you." Gloria Brame

(in reply to skareamoos)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Bound vs Unbound - 7/26/2007 8:51:12 PM   
peppermint


Posts: 5172
Joined: 10/18/2005
From: Montana
Status: offline
quote:

How many agree, how many disagree, and any explanations would be appreciated.


I agree and unlike you am not surprised that some with strong relationships do not have bondage as part of their play.  I agree that some others, you included, have a need and desire to use bondage.  We each do what makes us feel good or gives us pleasure. 

Wouldn't it be a dull world if we all needed the same things?  No one would have to seek a Dominant or submissive who fits in with their needs.  It would be a one Dominant or sub fits all. 

(in reply to skareamoos)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Bound vs. Unbound - 7/26/2007 9:53:37 PM   
amayos


Posts: 1553
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: New England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: skareamoos

I have been somewhat surprised to learn that in some rather strong relationships, bondage is not a part of play. I have always felt the need (and the desire) to employ it, regardless of whether I was currently bottoming or topping. Perhaps "need" is too strong a term, but fantasy and reality blend more readily when the bonds are inescapable. How many agree, how many disagree, and any explanations would be appreciated.



Regarding the matter of bottoming or topping, I suppose the theatrics of rope and chain are just garnishes. I have always been of the opinion that physical restraint should be used judiciously and often passed over in favor of a well trained mind. The invisible chains can be harder to make, but are much more reliable. Perhaps those who do not make use of excessive restraint think similarly, or perhaps they just don't have the patience for the intricacies of shibari.




< Message edited by amayos -- 7/26/2007 9:54:18 PM >

(in reply to skareamoos)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Bound vs. Unbound - 7/26/2007 11:14:32 PM   
onthenosetone


Posts: 118
Joined: 7/22/2006
Status: offline
Rope, cuffs, shackles bore me...if Ma'am orders me on my knees or over a bench then i go there and stay they till she orders me elsewhere....

I do like to see fancy rope work when it's completed, what a fantastic skill, but to watch it being done boring........

Each to their own of course thats just my opinion

(in reply to amayos)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> Bound vs Unbound Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.096