ExSteelAgain
Posts: 1803
Joined: 7/2/2006 From: Georgia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SusanofO I never really cared that much how experienced someone was - after I'd had my inital experiences with my very first BDSM play partner. My ex-Dominant (with whom I was in a LTR) wasn't that experienced - he had a few years, but not much more real-life experience than I did, really (he said five. I don't know if that is "true" or not, and I didn't care at the time, really). His attuitude and manner, and willingness to expand his klnowledge about some BDSM things and D/s made a big difference to me, in making the realtionship work (for as long as it did). I personally think that is more important than years of BDSM experience. For all I know any person claiming "years of experience" has only one BDSM activity they are proficient at - say, whipping, or flogging. That's why it just doesn't tell me much, really. How much do they know? How much have they practiced BDSM in real life? Those are more pertinent questions, actually. But even then - to me, experience isn't all that important. Safety is, but experience isn't, really. I think if two people "click", then they can learn how to do almost anything as time goes on. Together. I almost missed this. Yes, good points here, Susan. What if a total unfeeling, imbecile could pefectly flog the hell out of you, would you think he was the end-all Dom? Choose your activity if flogging is not it. D/s and M/s is so much more than a simple BDSM activity. I don't want to pick on a particular fetish because I like to play with most everything, but some practitioners can become totally snobbish because they can tie a certain knot or do a fancy flogging pattern. Isn't someone who can understand her desire for submission in depth and use this to take control of her in a way that leaves her knowing she is helpless, much more powerful?
_____________________________
You can paint a cinder block bright pastel pink, but it's still a cinder block. (By Me.)
|