Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 2:34:25 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
I'm listening to The Howie Carr Show out of Boston, Mass on wrko-680 am.
Howie said that the governor of the bluest of blue states, Deval Patrick said today that, "9/11 was a failure of people to love and respect one another."
Can you say "MOOOOOOON - BAT?"

Patrick's campaign slogan was "Let's reach for that!"
Hey Duval, "reach for this!"

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to NeedToUseYou)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 2:43:12 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
Many people died: various nationalities, various religions; a senseless waste of life, but it's folly to take an event out of its context.

'No use going into details, but the biggest killers and the instigators of this tit-for-tat cycle of violence is the US government, and they are democratically elected; this isn't a "you deserved it message" at all, because no one deserves to lose their life, but the US government and its supporters has a lot to answer for.

I can't remember any threads mourning the dead of Iraq; a more even-handed approach would earn sympathy.

I'm a sympathiser in the sense that no one deserves to lose their life, but I have more sympathy for the plight of the Iraqis.

'An outsiders point of view.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 3:49:28 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
I cant see why one thread about remembering people gets modded as its straying off topic, yet the one about Hiroshima wasnt modded. Surely both are about respect for those who died ?

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 4:12:15 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
How come the Saudi's haven't paid for attacking us on 9/11?



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 8:58:59 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611

There are certain people out there who try to use this event to further their own political goals. Yes, Rudy Giuliani uses 9/11 far too often in his political speeches. But the left wing also uses it to prove some sort of higher theory they suddenly came up with.....That it is America's fault. That it is our foreign policy or economic policy that provoked the attacks therefore we somehow deserved to be attacked.

And that's flawed logic. It's almost like you are letting the terrorists off the hook completely agreeing with their message of anger and violence. To tell you the truth....I DONT GIVE A DAMN what provoked them. I don't care what we did or what they think we did. You don't hijack airplanes full of innocent people crash them into buildings. Did the people on those planes have anything to do with American foreign policy? Did the people in the WTC have anything to do with American foreign policy? No! So there is absolutely no justification for killing those people.

Tim McVeigh blew up the Murrah Federal Building because of the FBI's abuse of power in Waco. Is that a justified terrorist attack? We villify that man so easily because he is a radical, white, right-wing christian. The left LOVES to vilify those people. But when it comes to Muslims hijacking airplanes....who's fault is it? America's.
If Tim McVeigh had brown skin and was a muslim....I wonder who would be blamed...

If you have read any sort of history you would know that for the last 1500 years there has been a vicious struggle between the west and Islam. And there is no sign this is changing. Frequently you hear these terrorists in their videotapes going on and on about the crusades...about the Battle of Tours. They are talking about events that go back several centuries ago. They are diving into things the United States had nothing to do with because this nation wasnt even born yet. However, the US is currently the heart and soul of the free-western world. We are also considered a Christian nation. And we are the only super-power in the world. And that makes us a very attractive target for every person who does not like the current world order. So when terrorists talk about America, they throw us into the same category as Europeans and the Roman Catholics. Notice how terrorists are right now hitting Europe even more than the US. It is because they are targetting THE WEST! Not America specifically. They hate western Europe just as much as they hate American policy.

Until religions can figure out how to get along with each other, this is the type of world we are living in. And it's not going to change.


This is exactly what I was talking about,when I replied to SusanofO`s  "Can you still express feeling patriotic as a U.S. citizen?" thread.

My reply to the OP:

I feel the love of country, manifests itself in different ways for liberals and for conservatives.

I`ll use the analogy  of a parent/child relationship.

First off,both love the other, deeper than can be expressed,but they are different types of "love".

A liberal,like a parent,loves their child.They praise the child when they do well.But they correct the child when wrong,guide them when they go astray,and punish them when they mis-behave.It`s tough love,and w/ out it,the child is doomed.It is the most important type of love a parent can have.

On the other hand,for the conservative,their love country is much like the love a child feels towards their parent.The love is un-questioning and without condition,right or wrong.To a child,their parent can do no wrong.
To a conservitive,their country can do no wrong.
Hell,you`re mom can be a murderer,and the 5 year old is still going to adore her.It`s like that w/ conservitives/neo-conservitives and most republicans.

So yes, you can be a patriot, and for America,and be against bush.

<end>

Doesn`t this describe cyberdude, to a tee?

Neo-cons have been calling liberals,"blame America firsters",for years.Don`t let cyberdude611 fool you into thinking this is new.

Ever meet or know a parent who won`t believe their kid could break a window,or steal a bike?There are plenty of them,who just can`t admit that their kid is a trouble maker or a bully.Absolutely intolerable.

When a liberal/normal person points out that meddling in a foreign countries affairs has caused us trouble,neo-cons kill the debate by saying that all liberals can do is "blame America first".

LOL,doesn`t matter if a republican president fucks up our foreign policy,they(neo-cons) just suck up and brown nose them,like they were omnipotent,or without accountability.

And yes,it has been the republican presidents, that have fucked things up for the US,and created "blow-backs",like bin laden.
This is why republicans conflate America with their presidents.They say you`re criticizing America,when you`re actually pointing out how much of a loser, Regan or the Bushs were/are.


To tell you the truth....I DONT GIVE A DAMN what provoked them. I don't care what we did or what they think we did. You don't hijack airplanes full of innocent people crash them into buildings. Did the people on those planes have anything to do with American foreign policy? Did the people in the WTC have anything to do with American foreign policy? No! So there is absolutely no justification for killing those people.
 
 

That you don`t care,is clear.You have never cared.You don`t care about anyone or anything,accept yourself.This is very typical of the neo-con mindset."Fuck everyone",is their motto.You don`t care that Iraq is the biggest foreign policy disaster in history.You don`t care about the damage that`s been caused,or the future damage that this will caused.Got it...

And ,the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis that have been killed,by us?You don`t care about them either,and never have,in spite of the  bogus talk about spreading freedom.

We need people who do care,who are curious and thoughtful.
We don`t need a bunch of bush collage pals and cronies,fucking things up,just to see what happens......

  We need someone who picks competent,qualified in their field,accountable men and women





< Message edited by Owner59 -- 9/11/2007 9:13:18 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 9:17:00 PM   
ChicagoSwitchMal


Posts: 417
Joined: 9/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

How come the Saudi's haven't paid for attacking us on 9/11?




Bingo! The problem with attacking Saudi is that they are the largest of the OPEC nations. That means they have the greatest price setting authority. If we attack Saudi now the middle east will refuse to export to us (as well as other opec nations). However if we have bases in Iraq (the second worlds largest source of oil) we can control or influence the fuel flow from there. And cities worth of equipment will be a olt closer to Saudi than before. We know where the enemy came from. It was Saudi.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 9:19:22 PM   
SusanofO


Posts: 5672
Joined: 12/19/2005
Status: offline
I'd be willing to be there are plenty of U.S. citizens at any given 9-11 ceremony who have no fondness for our current President - whether or not they "should be grieving" and whether or not any 9-11 memorial service can be used as any citizen or politician's "political "tool" (which is, IMO transparent to anyone claiming it will be (or is) used mostly for that purpose anyway).

IMO, no matter what else it may be - it is also a perfectly appropriate memorial service. Amost 3,000 people died that day - that is plenty more than have died in some other "wars" we've had happen.  

I also think anyone who says something like "they just want to use it to scare us that there are Terrorists out there". Well, yeah - there certainly are. Maybe (or not) they have anything at all to do with Iraq - one thing that cannot be debated is that they're out there and they want to see us dead. Anyone who doesn't realize that at this point is, IMO, an utter fool.

As for the rest, nobody has asked me to participate, or dragged me kicking and screaming to a 9-11 memorial service. If I am not interested, I can opt out, not watch etc.

It is not up to me to tell anyone else how long they can grieve, however - and it doesn't really have much to do with how much insurance money they may or may not have collected, or how much un-deserved attention I might think they've recieved, collectively as a group. IMO these kinds of reactions to grief are pretty individually determined, I imagine, especially if someone lost a close friend or relative that day.

More people can get divorced, for example, over losing a child than for most other reasons you can name - I imagine this terrorist attack will never be erased from some people's memories - and I wonder how many un-intended consequences there have been on families (besides funerals), in terms of disrupted lives have occurred as reverberations of that day, that might well ripple through the rest of their lives. Frankly, I'd be the last one to suggest they just "get over it".

If people aren't genrally interested in 9-11 memorials - then they don't have to listen and-or watch the memorial services.

- Susan

< Message edited by SusanofO -- 9/11/2007 9:31:48 PM >


_____________________________

"Hope is the thing with feathers,
That perches in the soul,
And sings the tune without the words,
And never stops at all". - Emily Dickinson

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 9:49:47 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Today is for remembering our lost.

We have over 500 more days to point out what a failure bush has been.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to SusanofO)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:07:59 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
So, um.. how's Bush connected to 9/11 again..?

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:19:39 PM   
SugarMyChurro


Posts: 1912
Joined: 4/26/2007
Status: offline
He's chief law enforcement in this country. He was warned and did nothing. It happened on his watch. When it happened he did nothing except use it to enrich himself and his pals. Etc Etc Etc...

Did you just wake up?

< Message edited by SugarMyChurro -- 9/11/2007 10:20:25 PM >

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:19:46 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

The leader who beats the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into patriotic fervor, for patriotism is a double-edged sword.

It emboldens the blood and narrows the mind.

And when the drums of war have reached fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need to seize the rights of the citizenry.
Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will
offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know?
For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar."

Take out Caesar,insert bush...

[Mod Note:  image removed]



< Message edited by ModeratorEleven -- 9/11/2007 10:22:52 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:22:37 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

He's chief law enforcement in this country. He was warned and did nothing. It happened on his watch. When it happened he did nothing except use it to enrich himself and his pals. Etc Etc Etc...


So, in his shoes, as a newly elected President, what would you have done to stop 9/11?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

Did you just wake up?


What's with your consistently troubled demeanor?

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:23:10 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

He's chief law enforcement in this country. He was warned and did nothing. It happened on his watch. When it happened he did nothing except use it to enrich himself and his pals. Etc Etc Etc...

Did you just wake up?


Don`t blame him,it`s the cool-aid doing talking....

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:24:24 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
You're comparing Bush to the man who led the world's greatest empire to a new peak of prosperity..?  This has to be one of the strangest insults I've seen in a good while..

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:26:26 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

He's chief law enforcement in this country. He was warned and did nothing. It happened on his watch. When it happened he did nothing except use it to enrich himself and his pals. Etc Etc Etc...

Did you just wake up?


Don`t blame him,it`s the cool-aid doing talking....


You two are quite the couple of angry men..

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:37:13 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

You're comparing Bush to the man who led the world's greatest empire to a new peak of prosperity..?  This has to be one of the strangest insults I've seen in a good while..


(whushhhh)<meaning flies right over his head>

You obviously don`t see the similarities and corollaries,here.If you don`t get it,it can`t be explained.


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:38:56 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

He's chief law enforcement in this country. He was warned and did nothing. It happened on his watch. When it happened he did nothing except use it to enrich himself and his pals. Etc Etc Etc...

Did you just wake up?


Don`t blame him,it`s the cool-aid doing talking....


You two are quite the couple of angry men..



awwwww,there,there now.....

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:45:29 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

You're comparing Bush to the man who led the world's greatest empire to a new peak of prosperity..?  This has to be one of the strangest insults I've seen in a good while..


(whushhhh)<meaning flies right over his head>

You obviously don`t see the similarities and corollaries,here.If you don`t get it,it can`t be explained.


Erm, yes, noting that you're comparing Bush to a historical figure of great repute as an insult being odd is obviously a sign of missing the point you're trying to make.

Not to be a grammar nazi, but a "corollary" is a theory.  You're looking for "correlation", I think.
 
 
Edit:  Since I feel sort of guilty spamming this thread with this junk.. here's the other.. "response"..

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

You two are quite the couple of angry men..



awwwww,there,there now.....


Does being prejustice, hateful, and condescending not embarrase you, or otherwise contradict your definition of self?

< Message edited by CuriousLord -- 9/11/2007 10:48:34 PM >

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:45:53 PM   
onegoodgirl


Posts: 126
Joined: 5/6/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Today is for remembering our lost.

We have over 500 more days to point out what a failure bush has been.


/echo


_____________________________

"This aint a scene.. it's a god-damned arms race!" - Fall Out Boy

http://www.myspace.com/bellaemiliana

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:49:59 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: onegoodgirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Today is for remembering our lost.

We have over 500 more days to point out what a failure bush has been.


/echo


Well, same response to you, then, I suppose.  In his shoes, what would you have done?

(in reply to onegoodgirl)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

1.370