RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:56:27 PM

Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: onegoodgirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Today is for remembering our lost.

We have over 500 more days to point out what a failure bush has been.

/echo

Well, same response to you, then, I suppose. In his shoes, what would you have done?

1) Not invaded Iraq.

2) Not saddled a bunch of toothless poor people with 485 million dollars in debt after their lives were flushed
by a hurricane named Katrina.

3) Gone in to Afghanistan, used the information culled from Al Qaeda computers to allow the law enforcement arms of our country to silence Al Qaeda (wait, they did do that).

3a) Not continued to try to frighten the American people with the Al Qaeda boogy man I knew was silenced.

4) Done my best to maintain the US position as a benevolent superpower by treating other countries as equals.

5) Not borrowed trillions of dollars from countries like China to support my disasterous policies.

Need me to go on? Or are we good for the moment.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 10:58:21 PM

Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

While this is an interesting enough list, the context of "[in] his shoes, what would you have done differently?" was referring to Bush's alleged responsiblity for 9/11.

Edit: Used the Italics tag inadvertantly.

< Message edited by CuriousLord -- 9/11/2007 11:00:15 PM >

(in reply to Sinergy)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:01:26 PM

Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

While this is an interesting enough list, the context of "n his shoes, what would you have done differently?" was referring to Bush's alleged negligance contributing to 9/11.

For those playing the home game, almost all of the examples I gave were rationalized by Bush as being necessary because of 9/11.

CuriousLord, feel free to play again.

Sinergy

Edited to ask CuriousLord if it is his contention that Bush may have lied to us about his responses to 9/11?

< Message edited by Sinergy -- 9/11/2007 11:02:16 PM >

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:01:37 PM

Posts: 17
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline

sounds like simianboy and his cronies have done all the best for god, country, and the world...any other choices? maybe he will change the laws and run again? it's been soooo successful so far, how about 4 or 12 more years of this?

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:02:52 PM

Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

While this is an interesting enough list, the context of "n his shoes, what would you have done differently?" was referring to Bush's alleged negligance contributing to 9/11.

For those playing the home game, almost all of the examples I gave were rationalized by Bush as being necessary because of 9/11.

I still don't see how these contribute to 9/11 happening..

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

CuriousLord, feel free to play again.

Not another bloated ego..

(in reply to Sinergy)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:03:51 PM

Posts: 17
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

While this is an interesting enough list, the context of "[in] his shoes, what would you have done differently?" was referring to Bush's alleged responsiblity for 9/11.

Edit: Used the Italics tag inadvertantly.

oh, and bush is totally innocent of any alleged responsibility for anything having to do with 9/11 and its repercussion, yes?

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:05:13 PM

Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergysdarlin

sounds like simianboy and his cronies have done all the best for god, country, and the world...any other choices? maybe he will change the laws and run again? it's been soooo successful so far, how about 4 or 12 more years of this?

While I realize you're probably just trying to help your mate in his.. well, I suppose his ego.. Bush and his career aren't the subject, outside of the parts related to the cause of 9/11..

Please, not another "I hate Bush" thread.

(in reply to Sinergysdarlin)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:06:18 PM

Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergysdarlin

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

While this is an interesting enough list, the context of "[in] his shoes, what would you have done differently?" was referring to Bush's alleged responsiblity for 9/11.

Edit: Used the Italics tag inadvertantly.

oh, and bush is totally innocent of any alleged responsibility for anything having to do with 9/11 and its repercussion, yes?

Ah.. so.. um.. how does this answer the question? Not that I won't answer this one, but I'm tired of people trying to change the subject to get out of a question.

(in reply to Sinergysdarlin)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:07:21 PM

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

now who`s angry?lol

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:08:50 PM

Posts: 17
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline

sorry, that was my OWN bit of idiocy, not any addition nor to anyone's defense. if you've an issue with my posting, please bring it up to me directly. thank you.

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:10:50 PM

Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

I still don't see how these contribute to 9/11 happening..

Fair enough.

I dont either, yet Anencephalyboy has wasted a vast amount of time and effort to convince us that they had everything to do with it.

So, to answer your question:

Clinton, on his "Im leaving the White House now" briefing to Bush, made a large number of recommendations about Al Qaeda and how to deal with them. The Bush administration ignored all of these and did nothing until
a couple of buildings spread asbestos waste all over New York, and insurance paid one of Bush's friends for two buildings he could not rent out or pay to have torn down.

Sinergy

p.s. Sinergysdarlin has a mind of her own, it is a rather boorish tactic to try to minimize what she has to say as "rushing to my defense." If you cannot play in the big pool, perhaps you should stay in the kiddie pool where you will feel safe in sharing your opinions.

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:12:13 PM

Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

Not another bloated ego..

Must suck when you are not the only bloated ego in town.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:12:34 PM

Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

now who`s angry?lol

Yeah.. I'm steamed.

(in reply to Owner59)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:13:00 PM

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

Ahhhh,<remembers "Eat a Peach",and Ain`t waist`n time no more">

Going to bed,night all.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:14:36 PM

Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergysdarlin

sorry, that was my OWN bit of idiocy, not any addition nor to anyone's defense. if you've an issue with my posting, please bring it up to me directly. thank you.

Alright, excuse me if I mistakenly assumed a connection when you and your mate both happened to start responding to me at the same time. I'll take your word for it at the two are unrelated events.

What part made it seem like I was upset about it? And.. didn't I respond to you, and only you, directly about it?

(in reply to Sinergysdarlin)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:18:41 PM

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

While this is an interesting enough list, the context of "n his shoes, what would you have done differently?" was referring to Bush's alleged negligance contributing to 9/11.

For those playing the home game, almost all of the examples I gave were rationalized by Bush as being necessary because of 9/11.

I still don't see how these contribute to 9/11 happening..

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

CuriousLord, feel free to play again.

Not another bloated ego..

I still don't see how these contribute to 9/11 happening..

For starters,how about demoting Terrorism Czar Richard A. Clarke?

Run along now....

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:19:22 PM

Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

I'm not entirely sure why you took two posts to respond to one, but I'm combining them in this post.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

I still don't see how these contribute to 9/11 happening..

Fair enough.

I dont either, yet Anencephalyboy has wasted a vast amount of time and effort to convince us that they had everything to do with it.

So, to answer your question:

Clinton, on his "Im leaving the White House now" briefing to Bush, made a large number of recommendations about Al Qaeda and how to deal with them. The Bush administration ignored all of these and did nothing until
a couple of buildings spread asbestos waste all over New York, and insurance paid one of Bush's friends for two buildings he could not rent out or pay to have torn down.

So, please.. in his shoes, what would you have done differently that may have mitigated 9/11?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
Sinergysdarlin has a mind of her own, it is a rather boorish tactic to try to minimize what she has to say as "rushing to my defense." If you cannot play in the big pool, perhaps you should stay in the kiddie pool where you will feel safe in sharing your opinions.

Erm.. please excuse me if thinking your mate joining the debate at the same time on the same thread may've been more than a coincidence. I can assure you, no offense was intended.

I'll do my best to.. erm, withstand the 'big pool'.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

Not another bloated ego..

Must suck when you are not the only bloated ego in town.

My apologies for all the unreasonable insults I've been making.

(in reply to Sinergy)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:19:52 PM

Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

Well, same response to you, then, I suppose. In his shoes, what would you have done?

Keep the Taliban pinned in the Afghan hills and cut off from Pakistan. Turn Afghanistan into a Democratic Wonderland with satellite internet and TV in every school, village and home. Pay farmers to grow food, workers to build roads, schools, hospitals etc etc... Bomb with chocolate.

Continued to squeeze Saddam until he bolts or until the people of Iraq string him up from a lamp post. Let them sort out their internal differences.

Ease back US foreign policy so that it is merely annoying rather than insufferable.

Heed the constitution.

People dying at the hands of a madman is a tragedy. People dying at the hands of elected officials exceeding their authority is a crime.

Z.

< Message edited by Zensee -- 9/11/2007 11:22:20 PM >

_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to CuriousLord)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:23:20 PM

Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

I've included the backquote, which is somewhat excessive in length, to just ask this. Why did you include the full backquote of the post you were responding to, then quote a single sentence of it to respond to?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

While this is an interesting enough list, the context of "n his shoes, what would you have done differently?" was referring to Bush's alleged negligance contributing to 9/11.

For those playing the home game, almost all of the examples I gave were rationalized by Bush as being necessary because of 9/11.

I still don't see how these contribute to 9/11 happening..

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

CuriousLord, feel free to play again.

Not another bloated ego..

I still don't see how these contribute to 9/11 happening..

For starters,how about demoting Terrorism Czar Richard A. Clarke?

How would this have prevented 9/11?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
Run along now....

Please, spare me the ego drive. If you'd like a discussion, then, please, you're invited. If not, you're free to block and/or ignore me, as you see fit.

(in reply to Owner59)

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:25:18 PM

Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

In order stay on topic (and avoid another "I hate Bush" rant of a thread), the "In his shoes, what would you have done?", in context, referred to what one might have done to prevent 9/11, in Bush's shoes.

(in reply to Zensee)

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.227