MercTech
Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kiss0fpoison i had a Master who was alot older than me and i, to this day, blame myself for being a bad slave in this relationship. i was wondering if anyone could help me in seeing if i was in the wrong. This man got angry so fast! It was like a fuse that was pre-lit! He would never enforce any rules, he would just set them and whenever he felt like it.. he'd tell me to do..whatever. I told him various times that He needs to enforce the rules for me to understand that He is serious or i wouldn't expect to have to follow it. Of course, he would get mad at that and blow it way out of proportion and for the next 4 hrs he spent making my life miserable to prove a point. He would tell me that I am not a good slave and that he must be such a horrible Master... so a guilt trip. This would happen at least once a week. The reason why i stayed was because i was financially dependent on Him and had a baby with Him and didnt want Him to have to miss out on her growing up like he did His others. I stayed for the longest time until i just shut down everytime he would go into his craziness... So, am i just a really bad slave and should look into becoming vanilla or ... was He a fake? `rain` I cannot tell your mindset or his from what is here. But, a question that you can only answer yourself pops to mind. In service, do you want and need a "Top Sargent" that will bark orders and physically enforce all regulations? Or, do you need a dominating man who will set boundaries and expect them to be followed without constant supervision? The way you worded your question reminded me of one of the check boxes in the troop evaluation forms I had to fill out in the military: "Does good work under constant and direct supervision." I always preferred, "Follows instructions with zeal and competance. Able to work independently to achieve directed goals." Stefan
|