Mlicious -> RE: Ruined orgasms (11/17/2007 12:11:52 PM)
|
I see it a couple of ways, depending on how I'd use it. On the one hand, the orgasm, no matter how unsatisfying, is still dependant on when, how and under what circumstances I grant it. I make my pet suffer for quite a while before I grant him a release anyway. Then, the added factor and humilation of a ruined orgasm is all the more wicked, because, I have granted him an orgasm, but it will not be satisfying. I have not tried these techniques, this form of T & D is new to me, but I certainly intend to try it (my poor pet). I do wonder, what, if any effect a ruined orgasm will have on his desire to serve me. I will share anything I find out about that. quote:
ORIGINAL: Aimtoplease101 Sorry for the inartful title, but it's someone else's phrase. I ran across another discussion group that focused on ruined orgasms-- sort of a sub-species of tease and denial with a Femdom bent. That naturally got me thinking of the users of this board, and made me wonder whether this is a practice any of you good folk engage in? It seems to me to be a bit of an odd practice-- a lot of it consists of giving a hand job (or foot job or other limb or body part of fetishistic interest), which seems to be a bit of male fantasy fulfillment. In the end, the guy is allowed to actually orgasm, in a sort of weak, dribbly way, as opposed to pure T&D in which he's kept on edge and unsatified, and which theoretically at least keeps him intently focused on serving his Domme and keeping her happy. But because he is getting release (albeit not explosively) in a ruined orgasm situation, it doesn't seem to fulfill the same role of keeping him piqued and attentive that T&D does. So a bit of "neither fish nor fowl" going on here. Do you folks (question addressed both to Dommes and subs here) engage in this form of play? If so, what do you enjoy about it (realizing that the subs might not actually enjoy it)? Regards, ATP
|
|
|
|