laurell3
Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: carlie310 FR--I am sorry for having derailed this into a CPS debate thread. My response in general is to hope that those who hold better opinions of CPS than I do are right, and I am wrong. But having met several people who had quite different experiences, my comments were mainly in hopes that the next time you see a CPS case on television, that you pause to think. Before this happened to my friends (and meeting others who have had through-the-looking-glass experiences with CPS), I would assume that there was something that needed to happen. Having friends get their child snatched from them in mid-winter, against the orders of the court, without needed medication or a coat. . .that did make me a little biased. This is one discussion that I genuinely hope that I am in the wrong in, because we would be better off to have a functioning system. I don't think it's so, at least in my state, but YMMV. As I stated previously, I do believe there are horror stories that are true, I've witnessed a few. I don't believe, here at least, they are the norm. The problem is the system that we have in place is underfunded resulting in undereducated, overworked and undersupported people making important life decisions on behalf of families. I'm not sure how we address that. The states systems receive annual evaluations every year. Our state foster care system got a very low rating last year, as a result, the department, judges and politicians are looking at ways to revamp the system. The bottom line seems to always come down to money and how much is allocated for something that is very important but often underfunded. I think it's important to note that while an ex may have some say in what happens with the children depending on how your divorce/custody decree is worded, that alone should not be controlling with regard to the government as whether they dislike your actions and whether your actions constitute a true risk for harm for the children are two different things. Adults do things all the time that may have risks; we smoke, we drink, we speed, we go mountain climbing, we bungee jump, we participate in bdsm...that alone shouldn't be an issue unless it effects the um's. Then again, how conservative your area is and which person you're dealing with whether it be judge, prosecutor or case worker/cps can determine how the definition of a risk of harm is interpreted.
_____________________________
I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence. When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.
|