Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

Does obedience = "doormat"?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Does obedience = "doormat"? Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 3:25:08 PM   
1RottenJohnny


Posts: 113
Joined: 11/12/2004
Status: offline
It's been a long time since I've posted on the boards but I have a question that's been eating away at me for some time now and it stems from an issue in my last relationship.

I'm not a demanding person but I put a great deal of value on simple obedience from my submissive. One day my sub was online, chatting with a couple, and they invited us to join them on a trip they had planned to Las Vegas. As much as we wanted to go, we simply didn't have the money or time to spend. I asked her to send a reply thanking them for the offer but declining. Her response to me was, "That's your responsibility.".

She wasn't going to respond because she felt it was my responsibility? Her reasoning was two fold: 1) Because two months earlier I had swapped a few e-mails with the Dom of this couple they were MY friends and therefore I was responsible for all communications with them, and; 2) She felt that because I was the Dom it was simply my place to respond to the invitation.

Now, maybe I'm just too simple minded but considering she was already sitting at the computer and chatting with them I just didn't see her logic. After a little prodding she finally responded as I asked but that wasn't the end of it.

She was so upset that I asked her to respond to the invitation that she decided to ask other Doms what they thought about it. A couple of days later she called me to tell me that everyone she talked to agreed with her and that I was wrong.

Personally, I don't care what another Dom thinks. I'm her Dom, not them. Why couldn't she have just done as I asked?

Anyway, this little issue snowballed and I was eventually accused of wanting a "doormat".

Hence, my question:

Does wanting obedience from your sub mean you're treating them as a 'doormat'? I realize everyone lives this lifestyle differently but I've always thought obedience comes with the choice of being a sub or slave.

And while we're on the subject...

Can someone define just what 'doormat' means anyway? I'm sure there's a legitimate reason for the existence of the term but I'm beginning to get the impression that many subs use it as an escape hatch to prevent from having to perform up to the expectations of their Dom. It made me feel like I was being accused of being a rapist or pedophile. I guess I could have just as easily thrown her on the floor and wiped my feet on her but that isn't really my style. As far as my relationships go, I take great pride in treating my submissive with respect and patience and I felt I didn't deserve the attack.

This wasn't the only reason I ended our relationship. It really came down to the fact that our outlooks on the lifestyle were very different. But now I'm wondering how much more of this I'm going to have to deal with simply because I want an obedient woman.

_____________________________

Compassion is a wonderful thing...taken in moderation!
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 3:38:39 PM   
EmeraldSlave2


Posts: 3645
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
Um, wow.

quote:

ORIGINAL: 1RottenJohnny
She wasn't going to respond because she felt it was my responsibility? Her reasoning was two fold: 1) Because two months earlier I had swapped a few e-mails with the Dom of this couple they were MY friends and therefore I was responsible for all communications with them,

A reasonable enough thing actually. However, the invitation was extended towards you both so either of you could have responded just fine.

quote:

and; 2) She felt that because I was the Dom it was simply my place to respond to the invitation.

Which essentially means she's telling you how you have to behave and what the rules are.

Fun.

quote:


She was so upset that I asked her to respond to the invitation that she decided to ask other Doms what they thought about it. A couple of days later she called me to tell me that everyone she talked to agreed with her and that I was wrong.

A sure sign that she KNOWS somethings not quite right- rounding up the cavalry. If she cares what they think so much, why doesn't she submit to them? I support subs asking for advice, but this is pretty obvious that she wanted to prove herself right more than actually consider the issue.

quote:

Anyway, this little issue snowballed and I was eventually accused of wanting a "doormat".

Well my guess is this involves more than this little incident and perhaps other things. Based on this alone however, it sounds pretty typical of a sub not obeying, on something that obviously didn't violate any limits, but not liking the whole "submitting when I don't feel like" bit.

quote:


Does wanting obedience from your sub mean you're treating them as a 'doormat'? I realize everyone lives this lifestyle differently but I've always thought obedience comes with the choice of being a sub or slave.

If you're ordered to be a doormat, then absolutely. But expecting submission within the consented parameters of the relationship is perfectly fine. Even if she DID have a problem with the order, the real issue here is not her flawed logic, it's her continued fighting against you by going to others to prove you wrong. That's not how you deal with problems, that's how you try and run.

That's a serious relationship issue, submissive or otherwise.
quote:


Can someone define just what 'doormat' means anyway? I'm sure there's a legitimate reason for the existence of the term but I'm beginning to get the impression that many subs use it as an escape hatch to prevent from having to perform up to the expectations of their Dom.

More often it's used to make subs feel more secure because they "aren't a doormat." There's no universal term, but generally it's someone who obeys without respect and understanding of the order.

quote:

This wasn't the only reason I ended our relationship. It really came down to the fact that our outlooks on the lifestyle were very different. But now I'm wondering how much more of this I'm going to have to deal with simply because I want an obedient woman.

None if you get with a woman who understands and actually obeys. :) Again the issue wasn't so much her disobedience, but her inability to understand what submission meant to her, and her need to get some cavalry on her side rather than deal with the relationship issue directly.

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 3:46:26 PM   
MstrssPassion


Posts: 2444
Joined: 1/1/2004
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Status: offline
Seems to me someone just got their panties in a twist because she wanted to go to Vegas.

quote:

One day my sub was online, chatting with a couple, and they invited us to join them on a trip they had planned to Las Vegas. As much as we wanted to go, we simply didn't have the money or time to spend. I asked her to send a reply thanking them for the offer but declining. Her response to me was, "That's your responsibility."

Now, maybe I'm just too simple minded but considering she was already sitting at the computer and chatting with them I just didn't see her logic.


Maybe I am simple minded as well...

You mentioned you made an email swap a couple months prior & obviously she was familiar enough with them to be chatting. I see no problem with you asking her to respectfully decline.

If she wants to toss 'protocols' in your face... well yes you are the Dominant & most often invites & decisions will fall upon you, but you did instruct her to decline & by all means, she should have followed through with that.

quote:

She was so upset that I asked her to respond to the invitation that she decided to ask other Doms what they thought about it. A couple of days later she called me to tell me that everyone she talked to agreed with her and that I was wrong.


Drama...

It would seem your girl is too focused on her cyber community. Ever hear the phrase.. Airing your dirty laundry... tacky.

The communication should have started & stopped with the two of you. Especially over something a simple as what you described.

As to doormat... pretty much what it suggests... someone that you would consider to be a thing you walk over & wipe your dirty boots on. Asking a person to decline an invite hardly suggests that you were treating her as a doormat.

MstrssPassion

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 3:46:37 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

Does wanting obedience from your sub mean you're treating them as a 'doormat'? I realize everyone lives this lifestyle differently but I've always thought obedience comes with the choice of being a sub or slave.


Is a person a submissive if they "submit" to what they want to do in the first place? It seems to me that the "doormat" phrase is used when a sub is required by her Dom to do something that isn't on her "play-list". Akin to the "brat-sub" who is bad because he/she isn't getting the "attention" he/she craves. But why re-stir the pot of "topping from below"?

Are people abused - yes. But from the perspective you gave I wouldn't say your actions treated her as a door-mat. Unless a lot of other factors coagulated with the snowball on it's way down the mountain that you didn't mention, I wouldn't say you asked for anything from her that was unreasonable.

If two people get together and enter into a relationship with defined roles I don't know how acting upon those rules creates a "doormat". The exception in this case seems to be that the performance of the role by your sub wasn't generating the sensation or gratification that she demanded. Obedience by a sub is not required if it is outside her defined parameters. Obedience from a slave is not just required, but expected, and defines their role. Behaving consistently as you define yourself is not being a doormat, it's something to be proud.

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 3:53:04 PM   
junecleaver


Posts: 1145
Joined: 4/6/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Behaving consistently as you define yourself is not being a doormat, it's something to be proud.


Well said.

As to the OP...I don't really know what to tell you except that it sounds like she was incredibly immature.

_____________________________


"No one will ever win the battle of the sexes; there's too much fraternizing with the enemy. "
--Henry A. Kissinger

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 4:17:42 PM   
NakedOnMyChain


Posts: 2431
Joined: 11/29/2004
From: Indiana
Status: offline
I'd like to say that it's usually rude to go behind someone's back and repeat things they'd obviously not want others to know. We've all done it at some point, but it doesn't make it any nicer. Anyway, no, being a sub does not make you a doormat unless you want to be. Your sub simply sounds a bit manipulative. As to the definition of a doormat, well, I'm not going to be snide, but Webster's has it about right. It would appear that she was looking to say something that would bring you around to her point of view quickly...and that she didn't care how much it would hurt you.
Lastly, you're probably going to have to deal with at least a fair portion of people acting in a like manner to your sub. Not all people are the wonderful, perfect persons we'd like them to be. They all have their flaws. However, please don't assume, because your past sub was manipulative, that we are all like that. You'd be very mistaken. There are many emotional "children" on this site, but I like to think that the adults outnumber them.

_____________________________

"Oh, it's torture, but I'm almost there."
~The Cure

"I ask for so little. Just fear me, love me, do as I say, and I will be your slave."
~The Labyrinth

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 4:17:50 PM   
1RottenJohnny


Posts: 113
Joined: 11/12/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2

Um, wow.


Yeah, that sums up how I've been feeling pretty well.

quote:


A sure sign that she KNOWS somethings not quite right- rounding up the cavalry.


Could you explain what you mean by "she KNOWS something's not quite right"?

quote:


Well my guess is this involves more than this little incident and perhaps other things.


And you would be correct. There were many misunderstandings on both sides about each others opinions regarding the lifestyle.

_____________________________

Compassion is a wonderful thing...taken in moderation!

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 4:48:29 PM   
Delvin


Posts: 151
Joined: 8/23/2005
From: Texas
Status: offline
working on your question and reading some of the responses, I would have to agree with the information given...

your slave wanted to go to Las Vegas, and, not going, for the reasons given, still made it "a bad idea to NOT go". She then wanted to give you the protocal to tell them instead of her, because again, she wanted to go, you said no. You asking her to politely tell them no we can't make it, is not treating her as a doormat, she simply wanted to go, was mad you didn't, and didn't want to say anything to the couple asking, in hopes her temper tantrum would sway you to change your mind.

Her going to other Doms for this was manipulative. She wasnt' asking them if what "she" did was right or wrong, she asked them if what YOU did was right or wrong. ie gathering up the cyber troops to her side to tell you, you were wrong.

Perhaps a few days of no internet migh sway her back. Though I do agree as well that this snowballed from a simple demand (You asked her to reply to someone... she should of done just that....end of story)....to this currently going on..

Good luck with her

D

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 5:23:51 PM   
MstrHellsFury


Posts: 388
Joined: 1/5/2005
Status: offline
not knowing all the dynamics within your relationship...what I observe from you indicates this...you have a submissive who really gets into the cyber submissive mentality...( hense her need to "ask other Doms" about your actions)...I have found..and I'm sure most here have too...going into the chat about everything rooms can be a source of amusment to some..but serious they must know better then me or my(fill in the role) attention getting places for some...bottom line is she had a different view than you did of her role in the relationship...even by your own account..you didn't see eye to eye about the lifestyle...in that alone I can clearly see why she had the actions toward you that she displayed...there was not meeting of the minds within the core dynamics...thus the major meltdown...if it is ended...count your blessings and move on having gained the experience of lack of communication...wish her well on her other journey..as that road may lead back to you ifin fact that day comes when she may realize it's a very big..wild..and reckless world she's in...( I make this statement under the assumption you did the best YOU could within this framework)...look at it like this...if it's just a cut finger..use a bandaid...if infection sets in..get the correct treatment so the whole arm isn't lost do to neglect...

Fury

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 5:49:39 PM   
happypervert


Posts: 2203
Joined: 5/11/2004
From: Scranton, PA
Status: offline
quote:

this little issue snowballed and I was eventually accused of wanting a "doormat".

That's cute; it's manipulative bullshit, but cute. I see this as similar to dominants saying "you're topping from the bottom" when a submissive has the gall to voice an opinion.

edited to add:
quote:

This wasn't the only reason I ended our relationship.

She sounds like a real pain in the ass. Good riddance!

< Message edited by happypervert -- 8/24/2005 8:18:16 PM >


_____________________________

"Get a bicycle. You will not regret it if you live." . . . Mark Twain

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 5:50:29 PM   
Kinkypupper


Posts: 713
Joined: 9/26/2004
From: Portland oregon
Status: offline
Ok this whole post is a paradox...

She want you to treat her like a doormatt and to do everything and make all decisions ..
Then She plays "DOM" with you and wants YOU to do it..
THEN she says you are treating her as a door mat...

Am I the only one confused here ???

_____________________________

Phil Moulton
A Sensual Touch
Locopony Racing
Portland Oregon

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 5:56:19 PM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Does obedience = "doormat"?
Absolutely not!
"Obedience=#

1. The quality or condition of being obedient.
2. The act of obeying."
It's what someone does when he agrees/chooses to submit to another's authority or dominance, in my opinion. M


Wanted to add a link; I'll probably say more later.
http://www.collarchat.com/m_66572/mpage_1/key_doormat/tm.htm#66572

< Message edited by BlkTallFullfig -- 8/24/2005 5:59:46 PM >


_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 6:39:14 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2

Um, wow.

quote:

ORIGINAL: 1RottenJohnny
She wasn't going to respond because she felt it was my responsibility? Her reasoning was two fold: 1) Because two months earlier I had swapped a few e-mails with the Dom of this couple they were MY friends and therefore I was responsible for all communications with them,

A reasonable enough thing actually. However, the invitation was extended towards you both so either of you could have responded just fine.

quote:

and; 2) She felt that because I was the Dom it was simply my place to respond to the invitation.

Which essentially means she's telling you how you have to behave and what the rules are.

Fun.

quote:


She was so upset that I asked her to respond to the invitation that she decided to ask other Doms what they thought about it. A couple of days later she called me to tell me that everyone she talked to agreed with her and that I was wrong.

A sure sign that she KNOWS somethings not quite right- rounding up the cavalry. If she cares what they think so much, why doesn't she submit to them? I support subs asking for advice, but this is pretty obvious that she wanted to prove herself right more than actually consider the issue.

quote:

Anyway, this little issue snowballed and I was eventually accused of wanting a "doormat".

Well my guess is this involves more than this little incident and perhaps other things. Based on this alone however, it sounds pretty typical of a sub not obeying, on something that obviously didn't violate any limits, but not liking the whole "submitting when I don't feel like" bit.

quote:


Does wanting obedience from your sub mean you're treating them as a 'doormat'? I realize everyone lives this lifestyle differently but I've always thought obedience comes with the choice of being a sub or slave.

If you're ordered to be a doormat, then absolutely. But expecting submission within the consented parameters of the relationship is perfectly fine. Even if she DID have a problem with the order, the real issue here is not her flawed logic, it's her continued fighting against you by going to others to prove you wrong. That's not how you deal with problems, that's how you try and run.

That's a serious relationship issue, submissive or otherwise.
quote:


Can someone define just what 'doormat' means anyway? I'm sure there's a legitimate reason for the existence of the term but I'm beginning to get the impression that many subs use it as an escape hatch to prevent from having to perform up to the expectations of their Dom.

More often it's used to make subs feel more secure because they "aren't a doormat." There's no universal term, but generally it's someone who obeys without respect and understanding of the order.

quote:

This wasn't the only reason I ended our relationship. It really came down to the fact that our outlooks on the lifestyle were very different. But now I'm wondering how much more of this I'm going to have to deal with simply because I want an obedient woman.

None if you get with a woman who understands and actually obeys. :) Again the issue wasn't so much her disobedience, but her inability to understand what submission meant to her, and her need to get some cavalry on her side rather than deal with the relationship issue directly.



In a nutshell WOW ES2. You covered all the points I was going to so there is no point in my reitterating what has been said. Were a slave of mine to do what that one did we would be having a long and serious discussion and if I wasn't satisfied with her attitude and answers either she would be undergoing some major attitude changes or she would be out of the door with all her possessions pronto. I'll go to the wall for one of mine but there are limits. If she challanged my authority and did a survey with other Doms, then she is being manipulative unless she can justify her transgresion and even then I will not tolerate such interference. (This is dependent of course as to what the issue is like if I'm being bloody minded about saying "stuff it" regarding looking after my health, then she has a vested interest in my well being, I can understand her seeking help from my friends/family ~ that is love, care and consurn)

_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to EmeraldSlave2)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 7:46:27 PM   
MistressDidi


Posts: 61
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
It seems that everyone here is in agreement that your former sub was, in My opinion, trying to top from the bottom.

I do not accept that behavior in any way, shape or form.

I think you did the right thing to toss her, tho literally may have been more satisfying...

When you give a command, it should be followed. The only times a question or comment is welcome is if the sub does not understand the command or if You are generous in Your training, as I am, to allow the submissive to express her/his "issues" that may come up. If that is the case, the discussion can happen, yet the command is to be executed to My liking.

And no, submissive does not mean doormat. I believe Your former was not really a submissive at all -- how long was the relationship? I get a lot of those "wannabes" - meaning, they "wanna be" in control of how they will decide they are submitting. I cut them loose, but always find a way for them to serve Me in the future - just differently than if they were Mine - and they always do so gladly.


_____________________________

Always MY Pleasure.
The Mistress Didi*


(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 8:01:01 PM   
sanita


Posts: 338
Joined: 1/30/2005
Status: offline
Just because a Dom says "Because I said so." when a sub asks why, or begs to differ, does not mean that that Dom wants a doormat.

I would expect a doormat type of submissive to say "Because He[or She] said so" without ever asking why, or applying it to their own decision process. a non-doormat might not ask "why should i do it?" Rather, they might ask "why AM i doing it?"

when my Master gives me an order, i will obey it as fast as i can, but i do like to wrap my head around it. sometimes it helps me take initiative and do it without being ordered the next time. sometimes, i don't ask or question until days later, when the thought occurs... but there is the point. thought occurs.

some people WANT to have every decision taken from them, they WANT to be little more than a rag at the door that has bootcleaning responsibilities. they do not want to think for themselves. that is their kink. that is who they are. they are doormats, and happy to be doormats. and there are Dom/mes that want just that. i don't get the impression that You are one of them.

i agree with "happypervert" that saying You want a doormat was an attempt to blame You for the problem.

1RottenJohnny, i read Your profile, and i wonder:

(understanding You are not looking at the moment, i am referring to the rest of the profile) what type of obedience do You want? do You want obedience where the sub puts thought into her actions, and applies her own experience and knowledge to the actions taken to obey Your orders? or do You want someone to "just do it" and not question, ever? what do You want Your potential sub to bring into the relationship, aside from loyalty and obedience, and a thirst for pain? do You mind being challenged a little, so long as the respect is present? *grin* nosey minds want to know.

anyway, to each their own. if the worst thing she could accuse You of is wanting a doormat, You are going to rise above this pretty easily.


_____________________________

Sometimes, He calls me "subbie." Sometimes, i call me "subbie." And if someone wants to call me a BBW, its flattering. Just don't call me false.

"Please do not show me your ass and expect me to read your mind." -Opencollar

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/24/2005 11:15:50 PM   
1RottenJohnny


Posts: 113
Joined: 11/12/2004
Status: offline
I appreciate everyone's input. I would only like to say that I'm not attempting to bash her. That wasn't the point of this post. There's fault on both sides for the "meltdown" (as Fury put it) and communication (or lack thereof) played an important role. My real interest is wanting to know what defines a "doormat" and whether or not I'm being unrealistic in my wants from a sub (or slave, as the case was here).

Merc: I always appreciate your perspective. Thanks.

happypervert: You know, I thought about exactly what you describe regarding "topping from the bottom" for a long time. I've wondered if I had been a little selfish about the whole incident but maybe I wasn't.

Didi: It was a repeat relationship. We split once before after about six months (her decision) and a year later tried again for about another six months. I doubt it will happen again.

sanita: Your question is a little difficult to answer but I would say I'm looking for a little of both types of obedience (if I understand you correctly from what you describe). I like having an intelligent partner that knows how to use their head but there are occasions when I just want things done. We spent time discussing that before we decided to get together but apparently not enough.

As far as a "challenge" goes...I don't mind explaining myself to clarify my reasoning but I would prefer to have someone that was more interested in complimenting me instead of challenging me.

_____________________________

Compassion is a wonderful thing...taken in moderation!

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/25/2005 4:09:08 AM   
floorkitten


Posts: 50
Joined: 4/28/2005
Status: offline
I know this is not alot to add to this topic - but... I agree with the majority that she simply should have done as she was asked/told.

as a side note - Master frequently has me write and/or respond to comments, invitations, etc - in his behalf - and yes, there are times I may even be a bit uncomfortable in doing so - but.... i do not argue, nor pout... I do as instructed.

It is part of my committment to him.

kitten


(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/25/2005 9:26:53 AM   
Veav


Posts: 150
Joined: 8/1/2005
Status: offline
I'd like to recognize the fact that she was the one at the computer. It would've been faster and more convenient for her to reply, period. Hell, if the roles were reversed I'd expect her to ask you to do the same - it's just common sense, you're already there! Stupid, stupid thing to try and champion.

Submissive = choosing to obey another's will and proactively meet their expectations. Doormat = passively accepting dominance. It's the decision, the will of the sub that makes it a power exchange; a doormat exerts no will, or more aptly assimilates the will of the dominant. Which isn't healthy. A doormat makes d/s a parasitic equation instead of a symbiotic one.

This is just my understanding, though, and it ties into my own beliefs regarding d/s and exchanges. I imagine you'll get different answers from different beliefs, which makes "doormat" just another buzzword to be endlessly dissected... what I can say is this, that it was a stupid, pointless thing to champion and a petty thing to even bother with in the first place. I wouldn't lose sleep over it - the real issues at stake must have had nothing to do with this point sample.

_____________________________

Yes, I am Gordon Freeman. Accept this, and move on with your life.

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/25/2005 9:43:09 AM   
LadyAngelika


Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Submissive = choosing to obey another's will and proactively meet their expectations. Doormat = passively accepting dominance.


I like this as a starting point. I'd like to add my perspective. To me, a doormat is one who just lays there and takes it, like a doormat would. You walk all over it and it doesn't have an opinion or voice any preference. With a doormat, you have one sided communication and never get any feedback.

Seems to me, though I really have no idea of your former dynamic, that you weren't telling her that she couldn't give her opinion. I might be wrong, I wasn't there. To me, when someone wants a doormat, they essentially don't care what their submissive wants and are only looking to get their own needs fulfilled in the most selfish way possible. I doubt there are many who totally fit that bill. Just like I don't think there are many that fit the total doormat bill.

There are definitely dominants that are more controlling and submissives that are more challenging but in the end, it's about finding a dynamic with 2 personalities that mesh well together.

- LA

_____________________________

Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove

(in reply to Veav)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Does obedience = "doormat"? - 8/25/2005 3:23:37 PM   
ShiftedJewel


Posts: 2492
Joined: 12/2/2004
Status: offline
I honestly don't see that there is enough of the story told here to base an opinion on...

quote:

She was so upset that I asked her to respond to the invitation that she decided to ask other Doms what they thought about it. A couple of days later she called me to tell me that everyone she talked to agreed with her and that I was wrong.


Where in the world can anyone get that she was angry over not going to Vegas from this statement? Perhaps she was upset over a continued and or repeated action instead?

quote:

Can someone define just what 'doormat' means anyway? I'm sure there's a legitimate reason for the existence of the term but I'm beginning to get the impression that many subs use it as an escape hatch to prevent from having to perform up to the expectations of their Dom. It made me feel like I was being accused of being a rapist or pedophile.


And I'm sure that many dominants use this same reasoning to justify their behavior as well. I can't figure out though how you can be made to feel like a pedophile... was she of legal age?

quote:

But now I'm wondering how much more of this I'm going to have to deal with simply because I want an obedient woman.



Each relationship is different so your personal definition of "obedient" may differ from others... My suggestion would be to be patient.

quote:

Drama...

It would seem your girl is too focused on her cyber community. Ever hear the phrase.. Airing your dirty laundry... tacky.


Similar to what is happening here? No one knows for sure what happened or how she got the opinions she got... it could have easily been the same way he is getting opinions now... could even have been from some of the same people?

quote:

I'd like to say that it's usually rude to go behind someone's back and repeat things they'd obviously not want others to know. We've all done it at some point, but it doesn't make it any nicer.


Excellent point.... is this in regard to the OP or to the sub?

quote:

Her going to other Doms for this was manipulative. She wasnt' asking them if what "she" did was right or wrong, she asked them if what YOU did was right or wrong. ie gathering up the cyber troops to her side to tell you, you were wrong.


I would have to agree... if that is indeed what happened... it's similar to a dominant going to other subs and/or dominants and doing the same thing... isn't it?

I think I've made my point... but just in case... there is a lot more going on then has been shared with us .... a little clarity would be nice.

Jewel

_____________________________

Don't ask, trust me, you won't like the answer... no one ever does.

(in reply to 1RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Does obedience = "doormat"? Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141