quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

Every woman who would be my slave starts out as a virgin, regardless of how many kids she has or how many penises have penetrated her in the past.

I sort of consider it that way with rapes. Sadly, a lot of girls I've known have been raped. Some of them, several times over a period of time by the same person. So those never count against a person. Not that.. it's attractive to consider, by any means, just.. it doesn't seem right to hold that against someone.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: weneedyourhelp

Man whore? No. Through omission you proclaimed yourself to be that, quotes or no quotes. Hypocrit? Yes, I admit to accusing you of that, but by your own admission, and proclamation of wanting unsullied partners, just possibly, maybe, been a little hypocritical? As for malicious intent? You may be reading more into my responses than intended, because I am not a very malicious person, unless you piss me off. And it takes a hell of alot more than a simple dissagreement in a chat forum to get a rise out of me.

Ah, forgive me.  Somewhere between being called an "attention whore", a "whore", a "man whore", a hypocrit, and.. well, fogive me if I lose track.. I began to believe there was some sort of malicious intent.  How silly of me.

Well, if there was none, I'll let you off the hook and explain it in even more simplistic terms.  I acted like a man whore for an afternoon; this isn't a statement of lifestyle.  (Which I suppose you haven't been keeping up to have missed.)

I'll accept that you missed things, and I'll humor that you weren't just calling me names to be mean (mostly for lack of concern :P).  Still, how might one "proclaim" to be something "through omission"?  Sort of an interesting claim you've made, after all.

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

Every woman who would be my slave starts out as a virgin, regardless of how many kids she has or how many penises have penetrated her in the past.

I sort of consider it that way with rapes. Sadly, a lot of girls I've known have been raped. Some of them, several times over a period of time by the same person. So those never count against a person. Not that.. it's attractive to consider, by any means, just.. it doesn't seem right to hold that against someone.

Ummm.....

What in the HELL are you talking about?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissMagnolia

Well I like whores!! Hooray for the whores!

Who gives a fuck as long as they, and you, are happy in their/your own world?

Who has the right to judge or put a number on anything? Especially on a fucking BDSM site.

quote:

ORIGINAL: weneedyourhelp

First off,I never said that the term "whore" in any context, was an insult, or a bad thing. My past is filled with scores of partners. Secondly, I have been reading to keep up. And I was of the same misunderstanding.
Thirdly, You came into a conversation at a particular point, and made a statement. You left out certain details that would have clearly cancelled said statement by pointing out the fact that that "afternoon" in no way would have classified you as any type of whore. (hence the omission part) Yet you still made the statement you did. (the proclamation part)
So I hope you can understand how I have come to the conclusions that I have, and see that they are in no means malicious.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

Every woman who would be my slave starts out as a virgin, regardless of how many kids she has or how many penises have penetrated her in the past.

I sort of consider it that way with rapes.  Sadly, a lot of girls I've known have been raped.  Some of them, several times over a period of time by the same person.  So those never count against a person.  Not that.. it's attractive to consider, by any means, just.. it doesn't seem right to hold that against someone.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

Every woman who would be my slave starts out as a virgin, regardless of how many kids she has or how many penises have penetrated her in the past.

I sort of consider it that way with rapes. Sadly, a lot of girls I've known have been raped. Some of them, several times over a period of time by the same person. So those never count against a person. Not that.. it's attractive to consider, by any means, just.. it doesn't seem right to hold that against someone.

Ummm.....

What in the HELL are you talking about?

It was an offshoot from what you were talking about.

Was the.. point confusing, or just how it connected?

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

What was confusing was the lack of a point. Along with the lack of coherency. The lack of relevance was also a contributing factor.

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

it was the lack of tact that got me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

Every woman who would be my slave starts out as a virgin, regardless of how many kids she has or how many penises have penetrated her in the past.

I sort of consider it that way with rapes.  Sadly, a lot of girls I've known have been raped.  Some of them, several times over a period of time by the same person.  So those never count against a person.  Not that.. it's attractive to consider, by any means, just.. it doesn't seem right to hold that against someone.

wow, i do believe that might be one of the most naive and upsetting things i have heard on this subject, as a rape survivor (and a lot of people say a lot of naive and upsetting,  however well meant, things about rape). because i was forcibly raped and beaten against my will, it's okay, but if i chose to do it with different people before i chose to do it with you, it's not okay? it just feels extremely patronizing, and while i can understand the intention, it's the most backward reasoning i've heard recently. if i'm a victim, i'm not damaged goods, but if i wanted it to happen, i am. (if i've experienced both, what does that make me? semi-acceptable? mediocre? /sarcastic musing.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

What was confusing was the lack of a point. Along with the lack of coherency. The lack of relevance was also a contributing factor.

I'd encourage you to consider that you may be missing the connection more than there being a lack of one.

You brought up a situation (joining you) in which the "count" (to be clear, a count of previous sexual partners) was absolved in your eyes. This caused me to think of an instance in which I broke from the empical count, being the rape exception, so I mentioned it on my part.

While I may be teasing one poster, I assure you, I'm not flamming you nor any of the others. There's no hidden message. :P

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

Friendly advice: Stop now. The most generous characterization of your parallel between sex and rape is asinine.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

Friendly advice: Stop now. The most generous characterization of your parallel between sex and rape is asinine.

However you may find my thought process, it is honest. I'll take whatever criticism you have for my personal belief system.

Still, I would perfer criticism in the form of a logical point; to lose such an oppurtunity to find out something new would strike me as distasteful.