Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Clinton on NAFTA


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Clinton on NAFTA Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 6:24:35 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		Clinton has always opposed NAFT according to her campaign but it appears that White House Documents from Her Husband's administration indicate otherwise.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080320/cm_thenation/1300860_1

Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 6:29:59 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline 		Politicians are funny that way, aren't they? For twenty years they can preach this way, then they decide to run for president and 'that way' becomes inconvenient for their campaign, so they change their tune like you or I might change hats... and the gullible so willingly buy in to it.


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

Clinton has always opposed NAFT according to her campaign but it appears that White House Documents from Her Husband's administration indicate otherwise.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080320/cm_thenation/1300860_1




< Message edited by Sanity -- 3/21/2008 6:30:24 AM >

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 6:32:29 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		umm -on NAFTA  we need Canada.    In fact we need them more then we know.   [natural resources]

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 6:36:30 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		I think this could just finish Hilary for good.   Labor will have to withdraw their support or their membership will have cows - herds and herds of cows.   LOL

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 6:38:11 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline 		No, it's different for people like Hillary. It will go almost unnoticed.


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

I think this could just finish Hilary for good.   Labor will have to withdraw their support or their membership will have cows - herds and herds of cows.   LOL


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 6:42:01 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		Sanity   I am not so sure this time.  It was brocast to largely.   To hard to blow off after the remarks of a 3rd party minister made such a stink.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 6:44:52 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline 		http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080321/pl_nm/usa_politics_obama_richardson_dc_6

Seems that former Clinton people are evening shying from Hilary. 

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 6:52:58 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline 		I think people like Richardson are only coming out of the woodwork to endorse Obama now because it looks like he's sure to get the Democratic nomination. It's pretty much sealed up. For it to really have meant anything it needed to come earlier on. To say that was tied specifically to the NAFTA thing seems like a reach to me... were Hillary the clear party nominee, nary an ill word would be spoken of her amongst the Left, for any reason.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 7:41:34 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

Clinton has always opposed NAFT according to her campaign but it appears that White House Documents from Her Husband's administration indicate otherwise.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080320/cm_thenation/1300860_1




Well I've always opposed "NAFTA" and I'm sure I'm not alone.
Six months after it was passed they were closing plants and shipping the machinary from those plants to Mexico and according to The Boston Globe; "The Clinton Admin. was counting that machinary as "exports" to Mexico."
Unbelievable.
This "NAFTA" thing has been a *disaster* right from the gitgo.
Why do we need to wait for a new president to get rid of it?

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Clinton on NAFTA - 3/21/2008 7:45:26 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

when you start looking at these candidates it makes ron pauls short comings look insignificant dunnit?

I mean near angelic!  (cant have nayone like that runnin the country!




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 10
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Clinton on NAFTA Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078