Wheldrake
Posts: 477
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Away4Awhile Actually it isn't his fantasy which has made me question it...really he wants to use the concept as an introduction for a film project. He knows that in History...slavery was not by choice but believes in the BDSM and D/s context it is by choice in this day and age and wants to link the two together. I am still trying to see the link. This seems much more straightforward. Modern people who become consensual slaves in a BDSM sense are choosing to put themselves in a situation that parallels historical, non-consensual slavery in some respects. Slaves in history had to obey their masters and mistresses, work hard for them, and accept the possibility of being punished by them. Sometimes, at least, they had to endure being used sexually by their owner, or tortured just for the owner's pleasure. All those things happen, by consent, in BDSM relationships. Many details are different, and the distinction between consensual and non-consensual is important, but it's not illogical to make a movie that draws attention to the similarities. And from the fantasy point of view, historical slavery was typically stricter and harsher than modern BDSM slavery, at least in the sense that slaves were legally recognised as the literal property of their masters and mistresses and typically had no easy way of changing their lowly, vulnerable status. They were very much at the mercy of their owners because - unlike modern, consensual slaves - they had no recourse to the wider society if they decided they wanted to emancipate themselves. That level of helplessness can be fun to contemplate, even if it might not be so much fun in reality.
|