RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Gwynvyd -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:18:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Irishknight

It was mentioned earlier in this thread that there was a provision in the constitution for secession.  Maybe you came in a bit late to see that.  Aggression does not always have to be military.  It can be through political action.  Since many of you have said and agreed that the election just changed the timing of an event that was going to happen anyway, there is no need to argue about the election. I, in fact, didn't mention it.
The southern states believed that their established way of life was under attack.  They moved to defend their way of life.  The moment they did, everyone on all sides knew that war was inevitable.
It was a big political game of "You can't tell me what to do," that caused alot of American deaths.  If we erase every physical reminder, then we are likely to repeat it again.  The flag serves as one such reminder.


actualy in the orig. 13 colonies when Washington was General.. and having a hell of a time routing out the British.... We as well as the Brits knew Washingtons Army was freezing in the winter of 1780 with no supplies.. not even shoes nor food to march South.

Gen. Howe sailed South to S. Carolina and Laid Seige to Charleston. (3rd largest town in us at the time, greatest sea port)
The locals~ Here being the Great State of S. Carolina could not be bothered to help enforce the Southern divison of Washingtons Army. They would not even lend Slaves to help support the army. They were too bloody busy with thier balls and such. ( here the war for Indepandance rarely touched them)

Not wishing to be put out they refused every request for help.. and the city fell to the Brits.

This was basicaly the mindset of many Southern states. They set themselves apart from the Revolutionary war.. wanted no part in it, they would take the spoils from it.. but no work would be had by them.

As far as slaves go.. RI had more slaves then any other colony at the time of the civil war, and the war for indepandance. ( it was industrailized as far as things go back then, and had farm lands)

The South always set herself a part. Only when she was *required* to take action by the est. govt did she wake from slumber.

Gwyn 




slvemike4u -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:21:43 PM)

Irishknight I'm still confused here what actual rights were threatened other than the economic impact of containing slavery to only those areas where it presently existed.Lincoln took an oath to protect and defend the very rights southern extremists claimed were imperied.Further promising in his inaugeration speech to uphold all the tenets of the constitution including those of slaveholders..what more Lincoln could have done to avoid armed conflict short of expanding slavery to all the territories is unclear to me




Gwynvyd -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:24:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice


quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Rights to do what?

To enjoy sovereignty within their boundaries, with minimal interference from the Federal government.

Something guaranteed every state under the 10th Amendment.



On what issues other than slavery were the feds interfering?


I'm not a Southerner, so I don't have much of a stake in the issue, but even I remember from basic history classes that there were numerous issues, mainly economic, that started the war.  If ending slavery had been the goal then why wasn't the Emancipation Proclamation not issued until long after the war began.  People also conveniently forget that five slave-holding states were part of the Union. 


The Emancipation proc. was a *huge* concession on all sides.

Lincon was beset from all angles by people who *hated* him and what he was doing.

A large group of Democrats ( who at this time would now be comparable to your very right wing Reps. ) didnt want the war at all. Wanted it back the way it was.

then you had a Rep group called the Copperheads who wanted no war at all but a peaceful soultion.

he fought more with congress then just about anybody. It is amazing it got passed or put through at all.

Gwyn,
who lives with a Revolutionary history professor. *smiles* and we just went over this durring this past weekend!




SubRefuge -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:24:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gwynvyd
Words and symbols carry weight.  At some point we do have to say enough is enough. But when a symbol is activily being used for hate.. it should have no place in the public realm. Esp. one known to be devisive. Gwyn 


One could say that the Christian cross is used for hate and is devisive (think the Spanish Inquisition, the Crusades and Jerry Falwell), yet we allow it displayed in public at the top of tall buildings called churches and even on TV on Sundays.  Why do we allow some symbols of "hate", but not others?




Moloch -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:26:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Rights to do what?


You live in America maybe you should look it up.




Moloch -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:28:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

Archer, are you honestly saying the South seceded over tariffs?

That was a huge part of it exlisping the issue of slavery.




Alumbrado -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:28:06 PM)

quote:

One could say that the Christian cross is used for hate and is devisive (think the Spanish Inquisition, the Crusades and Jerry Falwell), yet we allow it displayed in public at the top of tall buildings called churches and even on TV on Sundays.  Why do we allow some symbols of "hate", but not others?



If you can find examples of those African nations holding generations of white Americans in slavery, or of mainstream Christian churches firing artillery at US military bases (as opposed to individual extremists co-opting such symbols), I'm sure folks would be really, really, really impressed.




SubRefuge -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:32:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado
If you can find examples of those African nations holding generations of white Americans in slavery, or of mainstream Christian churches firing artillery at US military bases (as opposed to individual extremists co-opting such symbols), I'm sure folks would be really, really, really impressed.


Oh, it has to be directed at the US to be wrong, eh? Against anyone else and it is ok?  Nice thinking.




Alumbrado -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:32:41 PM)

Another straw merchant...[8|]




Moloch -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:34:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

so when will they ban the rainbow flag?


This is the second time the rainbow flag has surfaced in this thread, and this gay guy has to object.

The rainbow flag was not flown by slaveowners, nor by people turning firehoses and attack dogs on unarmed civil rights marchers. The rainbow flag was not the battle emblem of people who waged literal war against the United States. Comparing it to the Confederate flag is completely boneheaded.


confederates fought for state rights.
so the rainbow flags stands for bunny farts and not LGBTA  rights?




Alumbrado -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:34:42 PM)

I WIN!!!!!!!!




Moloch -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:38:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

I WIN!!!!!!!!


My flag can beat up your flag!




Gwynvyd -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:40:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubRefuge

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gwynvyd
Words and symbols carry weight.  At some point we do have to say enough is enough. But when a symbol is activily being used for hate.. it should have no place in the public realm. Esp. one known to be devisive. Gwyn 


One could say that the Christian cross is used for hate and is devisive (think the Spanish Inquisition, the Crusades and Jerry Falwell), yet we allow it displayed in public at the top of tall buildings called churches and even on TV on Sundays.  Why do we allow some symbols of "hate", but not others?


that is actualy incorrect... the cross was not the symbol of the Inquistion. ( the red Cardinal robes were seen as a bad sign if you had them in your town.. you knew the shit hit the fan. ) as for the Crusades.. well that was this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Crusaders.gif not a simple cross alone. Nothing to be feared unless you were a Muslim.

Crosses for the most part in the worlds view mean hope, and Christ.

Crosses are not seen to be an evil or negative symbol...

Gwyn




Alumbrado -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:40:40 PM)

quote:

My flag can beat up your flag!



Not if I use my level 85 Flag Of Invisibility[;)]




Gwynvyd -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:44:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moloch

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Rights to do what?


You live in America maybe you should look it up.



Um.. She is French... so our shuffling here is a bit alien to her.

it is also prob. why someone got all pissy with her earlier...

someone must have lit the fuse on her tampon. ( not kittin's.. she is a doll )

Gwyn




slvemike4u -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:44:29 PM)

I'm not a Southerner, so I don't have much of a stake in the issue, but even I remember from basic history classes that there were numerous issues, mainly economic, that started the war.  If ending slavery had been the goal then why wasn't the Emancipation Proclamation not issued until long after the war began?  People also conveniently forget that five slave-holding states were part of the Union                                        Rulemylife slavery was economy in the south.Preserving the union was the goal as far as Lincoln was concerned he was quoted to the effect that if by freeing all slaves he could preserve the union he would,but if not freeing one slave would preserve the union so be it.The emancipation Proclamation wasn't passed prior to the war because Lincoln had no such constitutional power to do so....The five slave holding states that remained in the Union still had the protection of the very constitution the confederate states had abandoned




SubRefuge -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:55:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gwynvyd

that is actualy incorrect... the cross was not the symbol of the Inquistion.

Umm...you are saying the Catholic church didn't use the cross as their symbol in the Inquisition?
The Spanish Inquisition was used for both political and religious reasons. Spain is a nation-state that was born out of religious struggle between numerous different belief systems including Catholicism, Islam, Protestantism and Judaism. Following the Crusades and the Reconquest of Spain by the Christian Spaniards the leaders of Spain needed a way to unify the country into a strong nation. Ferdinand and Isabella chose Catholicism to unite Spain and in 1478 asked permission of the pope to begin the Spanish Inquisition to purify the people of Spain. They began by driving out Jews, Protestants and other non-believers.
In 1483 Tomas de Torquemada became the inquisitor-general for most of Spain. He was responsible for establishing the rules of inquisitorial procedure and creating branches of the Inquisition in various cities. He remained the leader of the Spanish Inquisition for fifteen years and is believed to be responsible for the execution of around 2,000 Spaniards.
The Inquisition was run procedurally by the inquisitor-general who established local tribunals of the Inquisition. Accused heretics were identified by the general population and brought before the tribunal. The were given a chance to confess their heresy against the Catholic Church and were also encouraged to indict other heretics. If they admitted their wrongs and turned in other aggressors against the church they were either released or sentenced to a prison penalty. If they would not admit their heresy or indict others the accused were publicly introduced in a large ceremony before they were publicly killed or sentenced to a life in prison. Around the 1540s the Spanish Inquisition turned its fire on the Protestants in Spain in an attempt to further unify the nation. The Spanish Inquisition's reign of terror was finally suppressed in 1834.
http://www.thenagain.info/webchron/WestEurope/SpanInqui.html

The cross as a Christian symbol or "seal" came into use at least as early as the second century (see "Apost. Const." iii. 17; Epistle of Barnabas, xi.-xii.; Justin, "Apologia," i. 55-60; "Dial. cum Tryph." 85-97); and the marking of a cross upon the forehead and the chest was regarded as a talisman against the powers of demons (Tertullian, "De Corona," iii.; Cyprian, "Testimonies," xi. 21–22; Lactantius, "Divinæ Institutiones," iv. 27, and elsewhere). Accordingly the Christian Fathers had to defend themselves, as early as the second century, against the charge of being worshipers of the cross, as may be learned from Tertullian, "Apologia," xii., xvii., and Minucius Felix, "Octavius," xxix. Christians used to swear by the power of the cross (see Apocalypse of Mary, viii., in James, "Texts and Studies," iii. 118).

quote:

as for the Crusades.. well that was this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Crusaders.gif not a simple cross alone. Nothing to be feared unless you were a Muslim.

Well, if it is on Wikipedia, it MUST be true!  Once again, since Christianity was driving the Crusades ANY cross probably brought fear to the middle eastern people.  And once again, your last comment is telling "Nothing to be feared unless you were a Muslim. "   Spoken like a true Christian. 
 
I guess Muslims don't count?  It doesn't matter if they were raped, maimed and killed by Christians because "God was on their side"?  Nice thinking.

quote:


Crosses for the most part in the worlds view mean hope, and Christ.

Crosses are not seen to be an evil or negative symbol...
Gwyn

Only to Christians is this a positive symbol. 
 
To me, a Christian cross indicates closed minded thinking by people who can't think for themselves and need to be told what to think.



 




SubRefuge -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 8:58:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado
Not if I use my level 85 Flag Of Invisibility[;)]


Ahh...that explains everything!   You do win!




Hippiekinkster -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 9:28:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

I thought it said Canadian flag at first and I thought that'll be funny. I thought it was a Canadian separatist group in the U.S.[8|]


Are they from Montreal?
 
I'm..... leery everytime I see a Stars and Bars. I know far too many who see it as a "fuck you" to black people.
Exactly right. Now, in the words of the Polish mathematician Count Alfred Korzybsky, "inventor" of General Semantics, "The map is not the territory" or, in this case, the symbol is not the thing it represents. However, the symbol is imbued with meaning when it is taken up by those with an ideological axe to grind; in this case, racists in Tampa.




Hippiekinkster -> RE: Tampa to erect a huge Confederate flag (6/2/2008 9:33:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

quote:

Do you mean that some Southerners are attached to the flag as a symbol the same way the Académie française is preventing the French language from evolving?


We are attached to it.  The South has been losing it's uniqueness for a long time now.  A lot of Yankees have moved down here in the past 50 years.  We have a great climate, and it's much cheaper to live here than it is in New York or Boston.  I get snickers and cute little remarks all the time about my accent from people that live in the South.  Honestly, imagine getting picked at in your native land for having your native accent.  It's unbelievably annoying. 

I don't even consider Dallas, Atlanta, Nashville, or the entire state of Florida to be culturally Southern anymore because of all the Yankees that live there.  I am not hung up on it, but it is a bit annoying.  I have to watch these people as they order sugar for their grits!  You don't eat grits like oatmeal, dammit.  It just irritates the shit out of me.  The Confederate Battle Flag is harmless.  It's a way for Southernors to keep a connection to our roots.  What is wrong with wanting to preserve your culture and history?
I eats my grits with tomatoes, bell peppers, onions, and hot sauce.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125