Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

"Wannabe", "Badly trained" or just not "My" kind of sub


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or just not "My" kind of sub Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
"Wannabe", "Badly trained" or just ... - 6/12/2008 12:40:41 AM   
darkeangelique


Posts: 23
Joined: 5/25/2008
Status: offline
I know there has been, and will continue to be, lively discussion about "labels" within the forum. So, with respect, i ask that, for convenience, common labels are used just a point of general comparison without debating their validity.

So my question is: How would you describe the "sub" in the following scenario: "wannabe", "badly trained" or "just not my kind"

There has been some tension in BDSM Manor between the Master and his sub. Over a number of days he has been deliberately spiteful in his requests of the sub (as the result of her honesty with Him over another issue). One morning, in a particularly cranky mood, Master sends an insulting and hurtful sms to sub, then another sms directly after telling her not to respnd to Him. Throughout the day His emails are curt and short and sub found them quite threatening, as she knows Master has a temper. Sub expressed these feelings of hurt and distress to Master who tells her that she is not a "real 24/7 sub" . sub then expresses her opinion that she doesnt think a D/s relationhip is about a sub having to take deep insults on the chin just because Master is in a bad mood. Fear turns to anger over the course of the evening and sub thinks it best to have an early night on her own and calm down.

Disclaimer: All characters depicted in this story are fictitious and any likeness to any one, living or dead, is purely coincidence

Thanx in advance

Darke

Two things are infinite : the universe and human stupidity; I’m not sure about the universe.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 2:20:46 AM   
julietsierra


Posts: 1841
Joined: 9/26/2004
Status: offline
Wow... I don't think I could describe the "sub" in any real way. There's virtually no information regarding her. On the other hand, your scenario tells me volumes about the "master."

juliet

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 2:37:21 AM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline
When everthing is the sub's fault, the dom is out of control - not exactly how a control based dynamic is meant to function....
 
Since there's no information explaining the dom's moods, I'm left thinking it's everything from his immaturity to a serious need for some anger management intervention.  Whatever, she shouldn't be spending her nights in the same house with him....  Maybe not her days, either!
 
Focus.

_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 3:05:55 AM   
adorableisotope


Posts: 13
Joined: 6/10/2008
Status: offline
Yeah, even with my super human intuition skills, I'd need to know a little more background about the unfolding soap opera!

But from what you've written, it sounds like the sub is the one in the clear here.

_____________________________

By unpopular demand, I will now gladly proof and edit your profile. Compensation accepted, but not demanded. :3

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 4:17:30 AM   
Wantstocontrolu


Posts: 127
Joined: 4/11/2008
Status: offline
sounds like another "on-line" relationship that is not real on one side or the other, when trust is lost due to a indescression it is LOST, gone. time to move on.. On the other hand the "master" may just be another wannabe.

A coller of anykind does go both ways

_____________________________

wantstocontrolu

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 4:40:29 AM   
darkeangelique


Posts: 23
Joined: 5/25/2008
Status: offline
I would love to provide more information from the opera, but feel that it would be too intimate for our little sub and could cause her great grief in future chapters.

From this chapter though, would you say she was not being  a "sub" by recognising she was angry and deciding to be alone? Was she out of order (showing herself up as a wannabe) by questioning His idea of 24/7 (ie. do as you are told no matter what)? Would you say her questioning is due to poor training, poor judgement or her own (really) dominant personality?

Can a real D/s relationship exist and survive  if it is based on fear?

Darke

_____________________________

Two things are infinite: the universe and human studity; I'm not sure about the universe

(in reply to adorableisotope)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 4:44:04 AM   
darkeangelique


Posts: 23
Joined: 5/25/2008
Status: offline
For the sake of the scenario, lets assume this was a real life relationship, one that had lasted say 4 years to this point?

Darke

_____________________________

Two things are infinite: the universe and human studity; I'm not sure about the universe

(in reply to Wantstocontrolu)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 4:51:42 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
Going on the assumption that in the past he told her to respond to him with her honest emotions, I'd call her a human being in touch with herself and him an insecure ass. Now if he told her he didn't give a damn about her, that it was all about him, and to hell with her being happy, then I'd call her stupid for getting into that situation in the beginning.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 5:08:32 AM   
sambamanslilgirl


Posts: 10926
Joined: 2/5/2007
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
the "master" is an egotistical jerk who cannot master himself and his bad moods. the "sub" lacks self-esteem for being in this abusive relationship.

_____________________________

...2011 - year of the fabulous rock star life ...and i do it so well...


...announcing Mr. & Mrs. British Petrol ...yeah, marrying into oil is slick business...

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 5:44:02 AM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
I feel the one sided fault scenario depicted is false and designed to suport an opinon already held and looking only to be supported. Writtrs bias is so plainly obvious.

(in reply to sambamanslilgirl)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 6:07:32 AM   
antipode


Posts: 1787
Joined: 4/19/2004
Status: offline
Subs are described on personality and structure, not on a paragraph. Useless exercise, in my view.

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 6:18:41 AM   
chamberqueen


Posts: 1597
Joined: 10/25/2007
From: Kalamazoo, MI
Status: offline
There seems to be a mistaken impression that the sub is "bad" for thinking or feeling.  Subs, and slaves, still get their feelings hurt.  They always have the right to wonder about their relationship and whether or not it is fulfilling to them.  It is what they choose to do with those emotions and thoughts that makes the difference.

For instance, some people are very needy and constantly want to be reassured, and when the top really needs some space to just chill a bit the bottom can't seem to leave them alone.  (I have been guilty of this in past relationships; the more distance I feel from the person needing space the more I want to try to please them and receive positive attention.  I had to learn when it was best to just leave them be, let them give themselves an attitude adjustment, and just be patient.) 

I think that for subs/slaves there is generally SOME amount of fear - mainly fear in being displeasing.  Sometimes that fear drives one to stretch their boundaries, to try things that they might never have otherwise because there is a little fear of either being displeasing, not exciting enough, or perhaps even that they will lose the interest of the top. 

Labels are used differently in various relationships.  My Master considers me to be a 24/7 slave even though we don't live together because He wants me to have Him on my mind 24/7.  We are comfortable using that label within our relationship, but wouldn't apply it in the same way to anyone else's.  If someone in a live in relationship is suddenly being told that they aren't really 24/7 it could be that the Dom is frustrated, but the sub should also check themselves to see if they are really showing submission at all times or just when it is convenient.  Maybe they are great during session times but then immediately take back control of the remote, or demand to be taken to dinner.  There are so few facts to go on.  In your scenario it is obvious that the sub feels hurt - and has every right to - but shows absolutely nothing about whether they relate in a healthy way to their Dom.


_____________________________



(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 6:36:46 AM   
Quin


Posts: 37
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
I don't think any of those labels fit. Instead I would call her "human". I think everyone here can agree that communication is essential to any relationship and, from the scenario you've given, the Master is both retaliating for communication he didn't like and preventing further communication by telling her not to respond. Given similar situations, I've told my slave "I'm angry about what you've told me, but I don't want to hold it against you. Give me some time to cool down and then we'll talk".

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 6:37:11 AM   
wanderingstray


Posts: 26
Joined: 6/11/2008
Status: offline
quote:

So my question is: How would you describe the "sub" in the following scenario: "wannabe", "badly trained" or "just not my kind"

None of the above. Ignoring a man when he is on the rag doesn't reflect badly on the sub's submissiviness. He can learn to control his temper and then she won't be off avoiding him.

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 6:41:21 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
Hey, guys, note - all communbication is online.  This is an online relationship.

The first red flag was the "honesty" issue - the sub lied to her Master.

Second red flag is that the Master did not have a single session and then reconcile.  Or, alternatively, walk away.  Note that a punishment session could not be done RL!

Third red flag is that the sub then posted this "hypothetical" situation here.





_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to chamberqueen)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 7:05:25 AM   
edana


Posts: 594
Joined: 10/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Over a number of days he has been deliberately spiteful in his requests of the sub (as the result of her honesty with Him over another issue).


That's rather telling.  If your "dom" is making "requests" of you I'd guess that whatever power dynamic exists between you is negligable.  The rest reads like a regular old couple having a spat, which would make sense if you're both just in it for mutually "requested" play.  So, seems to me you should just approach it as any couple would who are having a fight.  Here's to hoping for good "makeup sex".

< Message edited by edana -- 6/12/2008 7:06:38 AM >


_____________________________

In service,

edana

"Discipline turns talent into ability"

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 7:25:22 AM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
The most likely thing is that he's tired of the fun and games and doesn't know how to be strong enough to be honest about it, and/or that he's found someone else and hopes he can just shake you off and make it your fault that it ends, and/or that you've just been too clingy and not listening and he's resorting to curtness to get his points across.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to edana)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 7:40:19 AM   
Dnomyar


Posts: 7933
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
4 years. Sounds like someone is tired of their sub and wants her to move on. A moronic way of going about it.

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 7:49:47 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14414
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: darkeangelique



From this chapter though, would you say she was not being  a "sub" by recognising she was angry and deciding to be alone? Was she out of order (showing herself up as a wannabe) by questioning His idea of 24/7 (ie. do as you are told no matter what)? Would you say her questioning is due to poor training, poor judgement or her own (really) dominant personality?

Can a real D/s relationship exist and survive  if it is based on fear?

Darke


I wouldn't say the submissive is any of those things. A "good" submissive doesn't "do as told no matter what". A "good" submissive questions a Dominant when the Dom's behavior may be damaging or can do harm to the submissive or the relationship. In this case the Dom is doing damage by not being able to communicate and control himself.

Our feelings are our feelings, we can't be told not feel them and we shouldn't be told that our feelings are invalid. The Doms reaction to be angry about a submissive telling him her feelings is doing a poor job of being in a relationship. The proper thing is to sit down and talk it out.

So, from the brief sketch of the story, I would say that they both have an issue with communication and the Dom is at fault for continuing to throw a temper tantrum. The sub did the adult thing by removing her self from the situation to regroup.

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or j... - 6/12/2008 10:09:42 AM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
I hate sub victim threads.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to darkeangelique)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> "Wannabe", "Badly trained" or just not "My" kind of sub Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.047