|
iwillserveu -> This was taking up to much time. (7/25/2004 2:24:51 PM)
|
I apologize to all for getting things wrong, but do not apologize for what I got right.[:)] I especially apologize to dixiedumpling whose character was slurred before I got to her reply. Ditto sfgrrl (who I could not be as witty as so deleted her character) and many others omitted because I gave up. Another specific apology goes to MOD3 who at the end would close the board that had become a flamefest. iwillserveu was going to make an almost all emotiocon post but that jerk deserves no apology. (Oh, Sinergy, you don’t mind being the comic relief, right?)
MasterSirMaster:
I think slaves have no right to a safeword and are good only for licking my toilet bowl clean. What does you think slaves are good for?
January:
I bet slaves line up to lick your toilet.
(in reply to MasterSirMaster)
TallDarkAndWitty:
I believe that a safeword should always be used. Knowing she is watching out for her own safety allows me to have a freer hand. I think that anything that maximizes my power is good.
(in reply to MasterSirMaster)
Sinergy:
This reminds me of the story of the ox and the monkey. The ox lived on a farm and pulled a plow. The farmer grew barley and used some to feed the ox. The monkey ask the ox why it worked so hard. “I like to eat,” said the ox.
You sound like the ostrich that lived on the farm next to the ox.
Of course that’s just my opinion, I may be wrong.
(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Mistress Dread:
Greetings MasterSirMaster. Surely you find more uses
your girls than just
licking your toilet.
I am sure they do your laundry too <<winks>>
Some here feel they
should go lightly
on their slaves yet still
feel worthy of the title Master
although they are weak
to let a sub control them.
(in reply to Sinergy)
MizSuz
I personally would not want to take away a safeword as I want to be safe.
Of course every situation is different and all must be negotiated differently.
(in reply to MasterSirMaster)
dixiedumpling
I would not trust a Dom who would not give me a safeword.
(in reply to MastersirMaster)
atrueslaveofatrueMaster:
This one humbly requests you read His post. He said slaves, not subs.
(in reply to dixiedumpling)
SuperMaster:
I think dixiedumpling needs to be punished!
(in reply to dixiedumpling)
Proud sub:
A message board for safe words is here.
(in reply to MasterSirMaster)
topcat
Once again I agree with MizSuz, and with Taggard. Frankly I would not like a pycho who insisted I be responsible for her health. I’ll do what I can, but I think she might be closer to her state of mind/body sometimes than I am. Though that is not 100% if I’m doing things right.
(in reply to MizSuz)
Estring:
I didn’t even know SuperMaster was now dixiedumpling’s dom.[:)]
(in reply to SuperMaster)
Estrict:
I’m not Estring. I think this is a clear case of a guy thinking putting “Master” in his name thinking he is a Dom.
Sandy
(in reply to SuperMaster)
MasterSirMaster:
Do you mean me, sandy or “SuperMaster”? Also does your Master know you posted an attack upon one of your betters?
(in reply to Estring, err, Estrict)
Estrict:
First off It is “Sandy”, not “sandy”. I respect your disregard for spelling rules, Please respect my choice to use conventions about 6oo years old. Second, It is not any of your business, but he knows. He also approves.
(in reply to MasterSirMaster)
proudsub:
A board on differing definition for slave and sub can be found here.
(in reply to SuperMaster)
|
|
|
|
