RE: chicken doms? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message

Focus50 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 2:47:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: candystripper

quote:

Good. Then perhaps we can agree that we have absolutely nothing to say to each other. I wish you well.

IronBear


Such a graceful send-off. i have much to learn from You, Sir.

candystripper

Crikey, will you go and have a cold shower or something! lol Or get on a plane then get a room.... I swear, you're almost incorrigible! [:)]

Focus.



subaltern1 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 3:26:50 AM)

This is all very lame. I think what Iron Bear and Jacques have been trying to point
out is that you have to act with a certain amount of decorum and integrity. The F-Master is clearly in need of some desemenating. I'd quit mate as some people are looking pretty foolish, and you're claiming to a be a D? Really ? My Master
would not be wailing on about someone blocking them, especially if they were idiots.

If you have allegations against someone why not make them directly to the person politely. Purely from what I have read here, it seems to me IB and J have much the greater credibility, and I will be following up with both of them offline to see what the situation is for myself. I think IB is the only Dom who has shown true leadership here.

Peace





Jacques1000 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 3:46:31 AM)


Hi subaltern,

Very cool name. So really have I encountered acolytes of Ranajit Guha et al who are involved in the BDSM Scene too !. Welcome--nice to have more antipodeans here.

One think you have to understand is that some people look outward for confidence and self-esteem, a characteristic (though not exclusive) of the older man in the midst of mid-life crisis. If either of those making allegations were worthy of a public debate then I might have be persuaded to enter into it--however, as it stands, it would be a rather one sided joust for the all the fey jouissance of dear Mr. F and Mr. M. They seem to think crude insults are both effective and witty.

I agree with you regarding the Bear--I wish I had the wisdom to disengage as well.
I look forward to your message, as as I have only ever blocked 3 people, it will be fine. (One of the protagonists here kids himself that he is one of them !).

Yours chortling with laughter,

J.




subaltern1 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 3:59:42 AM)


fanks ! Not many pick up on the name. :D

I hope the email about Theses in Sydney was helpful and if you ever over this way....I am sure Master and I could buy ya a coffee !

<<waves angelically>>



MrThorns -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 5:02:47 AM)

Maybe I'm paranoid, but isn't it odd that subaltern has appeared suddenly? Joined today (18 Nov)..and yet has posted to virtually every post where Jacques's credibility has been questioned.

Just met...and yet after an email about a thesis on BDSM is able to know enough about him, his job, and details as to why he is unable to use University equipment to do his own research.

Even the profile says that she is "Just here for the messageboards at the moment."

I've seen more than my share of virtual people show up just in time to support someone else's story and this seems to be no different.

Just something to think about...

~Thorns




candystripper -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 5:31:08 AM)

quote:

Crikey, will you go and have a cold shower or something! lol Or get on a plane then get a room.... I swear, you're almost incorrigible!

Focus.


*sigh* i used to argue with people like You, and i am trying to learn it's not worth it. Better to drop the matter once personal attacks have been made. IB has taught me a way to do so, and i am grateful to Him. Just because i admire Him (and lust after Him) is no reason to attack me. i have only said : i find Him to be of Great Character and Honor. So far, i cannot say the same about You. i was particularly put-off that You would publish on the boards anything Jacques said or did on the other side, in private. Emails and such are by their nature private. People generally expect and deserve to have their privacy respected.

Focus, i cannot understand why You're so upset, but it's obvious something on this thread pushed Your buttons. i can tell You from experience, posting while angry is not good for You or for the boards.

candystripper



Jacques1000 -> ChickenDom--How d'yall like ya chickin' out there in New Mexico, boss (11/18/2005 5:37:05 AM)



You may very well be paranoid, but as I understand she is a new member.
She emailed regarding my Thesis request as she herself is conducting research
on "alternative lifestyles" and I told her why I am reluctant to use my Office computer or the Uni network.

I have since had an email from her Master, and is similarly pleasant. I don't think she was defending my credibility as much as expressing the point that the whole exchange above is facile. If so, I agree with her. Indeed, if I had the time to be a conspiracy theorist I 'd say she was a Cheerleader for the Beenleigh Bear cos he came out out of it far better than me....and she lives in Australia too

cue * X-Files Theme Music*

And for the record:
1. I did not shoot JFK
2. I have never even been to New Mexico
3. And America really is the home of the free and land of the brave.




Jacques1000 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 5:38:59 AM)

Stands up and joins the rest of the standing ovation.

succinct, sincere and straight to the heart of the matter.



subaltern1 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 6:53:29 AM)

Only a chickendom would ask such a question of me.
are you going to apologise for the slur ?



IronBear -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 8:36:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subaltern1

Only a chickendom would ask such a question of me.
are you going to apologise for the slur ?



I may well be wrong, but I didn't see Thornes attacking you, but rather pointing out one of lifes little anomalities and the similarity of other events he has seen. probably others have seen the same thing but have held their silence. If its any concelation lass, I had the same sort of statement made against me on another and now defunct site because I had encouraged several frienmds to join because it should have bood great for them to be involved with the local pagan scene. the flaming got so bad with the moderator sitting by and sharing coffee wioth the main instigators. If you and your Master visit Brisbane, Neets and I would love to coffee with you both. I have little doubt that sone time in the future Jacques and I will meet for coffee.



Aileen68 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 8:38:05 AM)

I think that anyone following this thread will see the writing on the wall. Thank God I'm not the only one thinking this same thing. Check it out yourselves...just look at their forum post times and where they've chosen to post...and come to your own conclusions. I think that someone here likes to have conversations with themselves just a little too much...but I'm just a lowly little sub so what do I really know? *smile* Coincidence? I think not.



Jacques1000 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 8:57:19 AM)

well, it is hardly surprising now is it given Iron Bear, Myself and subaltern1, Master Taipan, and even dear old Focus are very close to each other geographically speaking. However, the trainspotters have been busy.

Yes, Bear Coffee would be nice, and her Master Anjali seems a nice chap too as I have met him in person in Sydney. But please Go, no-one from Australia post, all these multiple identities are getting to hard to juggle and Aileen will have an apoplexy trying to work it all out. :D



Aileen68 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 9:05:45 AM)

Trust me Hun...I'm not giving you... or you a second thought.



Jacques1000 -> Chicken Doms and Random Stupidity--who are you defending ? (11/18/2005 9:10:01 AM)

you keep coming back though don't you ?

now...run along.

>>>Other random Stupidity 13kms.



Aileen68 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 9:13:03 AM)

Wow You disappointed me. No eight syllable words in this post. You're slipping.



Jacques1000 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 9:15:59 AM)


But then, you are so easily disappointed, I suspect. And you also seemed to see yourself placed at the centre of a holist metonymy and me. I am very keen to disabuse any casual readers of the existence of such an association.....



Aileen68 -> RE: chicken doms? (11/18/2005 9:30:17 AM)

Then maybe you shouldn't have placed me on your list of people that you felt the need to send private emails to once upon a time. You are the perfect one for this thread. You do peck and run. Since you seem to like to do this also...why don't you change the name of the thread to something more appropriate for you...capon Doms? Now follow your own advice and run along.



Jacques1000 -> RE: chicken doms--their supporters get weirder and weirder (11/18/2005 9:40:45 AM)


Poor deluded thing. I have NEVER and would NEVER send you personal mail. It is a very troubled personality who would publically claim that I have. And I suppose I have blocked you too have I ? This thread is putrefaction enough without another ChickenDom in drag weighing anchor and drifting off....



Aileen68 -> RE: capon Doms...if the shoe fits wear it (11/18/2005 9:57:36 AM)

Polls and other Random Stupidity...Intellectual Masters, Intellectual slaves.



IronBear -> RE: chicken doms--their supporters get weirder and weirder (11/18/2005 10:04:59 AM)

Cant help myself (4am and just back from the hospital after Neets fell out of a tree and has a suspect fracture of a couple of bone in her foot, so the cafine is flowing and the cigarettes are chain smoking (good diet for a diabetis heh [:-])

When I see Chicken Doms, I have to wonder if this is a subtle advertisment for KFC's latest creation................



Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
2.929688E-02