Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Solutions?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Solutions? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Solutions? - 11/21/2005 11:11:15 PM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

Problem is...as much as I really hate the fact that we are in Iraq, the questionable circumstances that put us there, and the way it's being handled... an immediate withdrawl of troops would really fuck things up for years to come.


Fighting , winning and trying to control the middle east is futile. There are far too many nuts and fanatics that have absolutely nothing to lose. This quote that I read the other day is one of the most succinct and accurate truism's I've read to date ''The only way you "win" a war of occupation is the old-fashioned way, the way Rome finally defeated the Carthaginians: kill all the fighters, enslave everyone else, raze the cities and sow the fields with salt. Otherwise the occupied people will fight you to the last peasant''

quote:


How can we get out of Iraq honorably?

Since you asked and not one to skirt a question; my unpopular but pragmatic solution would be, (SURPRISE) to withdraw. Not only from Iraq and the middle east but the rest of the world too. I'd call for the US to eliminate all military presence throughout the world. South Korea would fall within weeks, Taiwan within the hour. A few more soon after. All returning troops would serve two functions. First to find capture and deport all illegal aliens, while fining the companies who hired them and placing the corporate officers in prison. Then I'd put entire military on border patrol. I remove all the "quality" airport security personnel and replace them with armed military personnel. For security I would adopt the Israeli versio of swift and brutal retaliation for any act perpetrated on US soil by a foreign power, or a foreign based terrorist group. Before I get the argument of "how will you be sure who did it and know who to go after?"; I'll take my "best guess" and deal with the consequences of "mistakes".


Before I read this paragraph, I would have written something very similar. I concur completely.

I would further encourage our brothers and sisters in Canada, the UK and throughout the EU, to systematically end all immigration, both legal and illegal. And that includes any and all types political asylum, regardless of the reasoning.

My strategy would fall under the simple premise that whether it be the Ukraine, Mexico or any part of the Middle East, there are more good and ethical people living in those places than corrupt tyrants.

By forcing the unhappy, good, ethical people to remain in their countries of origin {Because there is no other possible place to immigrate to }, it would eventually foment a revolution from within. The only choice would be to live in misery or fight for change.



- The Ranger





< Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 11/21/2005 11:12:21 PM >


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to MrThorns)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Solutions? - 11/21/2005 11:29:09 PM   
veronicaofML


Posts: 1317
Joined: 11/19/2005
From: from iowa..now in wisconsin
Status: offline
i am REALLY sorry but as "I" see it???????????????

ALL politicians are liars n thieves and oughta be shot on shot.


i hate politics, race, religion, sex and little green men for topics........

none of it is valid information.

take care



_____________________________

drugs sex and rock n roll,...drugs are good and so is the rock n roll, sex is over rated"
=============
"go straight to hell, do not pass go and do not collect $200"



(in reply to MrThorns)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Solutions? - 11/21/2005 11:33:01 PM   
michaelMI


Posts: 421
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: veronicaofML

i am REALLY sorry but as "I" see it???????????????

ALL politicians are liars n thieves and oughta be shot on shot.


i hate politics, race, religion, sex and little green men for topics........

none of it is valid information.

take care




my opinions on the subject of war would probably upset the balance of nature...so i take the 5th on this subject and hope it goes away...

(in reply to veronicaofML)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 12:16:46 AM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I would further encourage our brothers and sisters in Canada, the UK and throughout the EU, to systematically end all immigration, both legal and illegal. And that includes any and all types political asylum, regardless of the reasoning.
Say what? I didn't realize you were American Indian Ranger? I thought you said Italian/Immigrant? End legal immigration? M

_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 1:38:35 AM   
brightspot


Posts: 3052
Status: offline
I think that the current Presidential conglomerant should Own that they were Wrong!
I think that there is no sense going on with a war that will ONLY kill more of our young innocent, the majority being of 19-25 year old poor kids, with out settling anything, it could go on for years!.

I think that this war will Never be over with contentment filled, it will continue with wasted blood everywhere and for a long time, and if any of you have had the real visualization of the Vietman War Memorial Wall, you would say bring are young people home now!

Then promise to always be politically aware and Vote!!!!!


*Brightspot

< Message edited by brightspot -- 11/22/2005 1:41:41 AM >


_____________________________

"Comedy is NOT Pretty!" ~Peter Nelson

But..."May at Least One person have a sense of Humor!" ~KML.

http://360.yahoo.com/my_profile-TD4TwEw8crWS3GHFDcs_DK1rHmW6Dq_E;_ylt=Av2PfG9gH0wkQrMPivuMCivGAOJ3

(in reply to MrThorns)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 1:49:28 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL:

quote:

I would further encourage our brothers and sisters in Canada, the UK and throughout the EU, to systematically end all immigration, both legal and illegal. And that includes any and all types political asylum, regardless of the reasoning.
Say what? I didn't realize you were American Indian Ranger? I thought you said Italian/Immigrant? End legal immigration? M


HAR! Yup, you read me right.

In a nutshell : Think of the United States as just a larger version of Easter Island. The island has a limited amount of resources to sustain a certain level of population. The population is increasing at an exponential rate; while the resources needed to sustain the population are dwindling.

Not only should this country end legal and illegal immigration, it should also put an emphasis on depopulation. {Meaning : to encourage the current population to not to repopulate}

Now here's what true : There may be many reasons why people want to immigrate to the United States, but it's my guess that the number one reason is ''opportunity.''

Lets just take Mexico as example. With everything from an abundance of oil and natural gas, to timber, Mexico for it's stake, is a country of vast natural resources.
So why does the average Mexican citizen have so little opportunity? I tell you why! Because the people that run the country are greedy, evil and corrupt. The Mexican citizens with little to no opportunity have it within their power to enact change for their betterment.

So if the United States continues to open it's doors to both legal and illegal immigration, not only is it hurting itself because it's using up it's own resources, but in the long run it's essentially doing a great disservice to those poor Mexican citezens that have no opportunity. And at the same time, encouraging the evil, greedy and corrupt who are responsible for that lack of opportunity.

Now.... I know my logic my seem brutal, but we can't keep coddling these people! We've gotta make them stand on their two feet and fight back! And the best way to do that is, force them to remain in misery, amongst the evil, greedy and corrupt, as one day{Hopefully soon} they will get tired of it.



- The Ranger

< Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 11/22/2005 1:56:33 AM >


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to BlkTallFullfig)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 1:58:50 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

I would further encourage our brothers and sisters in Canada, the UK and throughout the EU, to systematically end all immigration, both legal and illegal. And that includes any and all types political asylum, regardless of the reasoning.

My strategy would fall under the simple premise that whether it be the Ukraine, Mexico or any part of the Middle East, there are more good and ethical people living in those places than corrupt tyrants.

By forcing the unhappy, good, ethical people to remain in their countries of origin {Because there is no other possible place to immigrate to }, it would eventually foment a revolution from within. The only choice would be to live in misery or fight for change.


I can understand your reasoning, unfortuantely, it just wouldn't work.
And the world would be a sadder place for not allowing immigration to continue, especially on the basis of political asylum.

Many people who are there in jails right now, fighting for freedoms. Fighting for the rights to express themselves. Fighting to be allowed to do and study in freedom. Turning our back on immigration would take away peoples interest in what is happening outside their own, safe little country. People only care (sadly) when it effects them. Like 9/11... like Bali... when it hits closer to home thats the only time when people stand up and help.

Demons best friend lived in SA during and before the whole apartied discussion ocured. He was raided, beaten, tortured. And why? For being a white person standing by His fellow black SA and taking a stand. He left, eventually, when His Life was in danger. Not to do so would have meant His death as a martyr, but what good does that help a cause?

When a popular christian artist like Helen Berhane from Eritrea is told to sign a document which says she pledges to give up practising her faith and because she refuses, is 'detained' and then 'disappears'...

Holding the hand of an indian woman raped god knows how many times just for being a hindu kinda puts things into perspective.

Looking into the eyes and at the scars of an african woman who has been sexually mutilated kind of makes immigration more important than whether they should stand up for their own rights. There are people standing firm for their beliefs and for their country - but sometimes, standing isn't enough and when children are involved also, that kind of puts things into perspective.

Peace and Love




_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 2:15:48 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
Angel.....


I usually agree with the logic in your writings, but I really think if people get to the point that they are hurting bad enough and can identify the root cause of that hurt, they will rise up and take care of the problem. It's an inherent trait in every human, they've just gotta find it within themselves.



- The Ranger

_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 2:36:21 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger

Angel.....


I usually agree with the logic in your writings, but I really think if people get to the point that they are hurting bad enough and can identify the root cause of that hurt, they will rise up and take care of the problem. It's an inherent trait in every human, they've just gotta find it within themselves.



- The Ranger


'' but I really think if people get to the point that they are hurting bad enough and can identify the root cause of that hurt, they will rise up and take care of the problem''

Exactly Ranger - which is why immigration HAS to exist.
Without it - countries will continue on with the way they are. They will murder, rape, torture, attack and grow stronger. Its not until outsiders become affected will the pain stop. The mass immigrations of asylum seekers places huge amounts of strain on wefare, housing, jobs and hospitals... then people notice - then the outside world pays attention. Without outside help and involvement - these butchers, torturers, rapists WILL persist.
The logic You are using is akin to say that let the victim deal with the rapist by themself - and thats never going to work, because the rapist will just move onto another victim unless the previous victim kills the rapist. And in that - the victim will then feel no better... some do - but the majority need and desire help...

Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 3:37:52 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

Exactly Ranger - which is why immigration HAS to exist.
Without it - countries will continue on with the way they are. They will murder, rape, torture, attack and grow stronger. Its not until outsiders become affected will the pain stop. The mass immigrations of asylum seekers places huge amounts of strain on wefare, housing, jobs and hospitals... then people notice - then the outside world pays attention. Without outside help and involvement - these butchers, torturers, rapists WILL persist.
The logic You are using is akin to say that let the victim deal with the rapist by themself - and thats never going to work, because the rapist will just move onto another victim unless the previous victim kills the rapist. And in that - the victim will then feel no better... some do - but the majority need and desire help...


First let me just say that I think it's an erroneous argument {I'm not saying you're making this argument, but I think many have this perception} when someone thinks that the reasoning behind the United States turning a blind eye towards both legal and illegal immigration is in essence an attempt to help the disadvantaged, poor. I believe instead, it's actually an opportunity for greedy politicians and corporations to exploit that worker and hurt our current workforce, by driving down wages in the name of profits for corporations. If the opposite were really true, both your country and mine would have seriously helped the Rwandans when such great numbers were being slaughtered. Our governments didn't do a thing and stood by and let hundreds of thousands of innocent people perish. Why? Because there was little or no opportunity for anyone to profit. Profit and profit only, is the culprit behind the illusion.

As far as the other part of your post, I actually do think the victim is the best one to deal with the rapist. My case in point would be drunk drivers. The biggest single factor in the reduction of offenses and stiffer sentences for the perpetrators, are the victims themselves and those directly related to the victims. Look at MAD. I can't think of any one entity that's had a single bigger effect. I think the victims of rape and their families have functioned much in a similar manner. Same with missing and exploited children.

And in the case of immigrants that live within corrupt governments? I don't think we're talking about individuals, I think we're talking about a very large collective that has a lot more power to promote change than people give it credit for.



- The Ranger






< Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 11/22/2005 3:57:17 AM >


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 6:23:47 AM   
MrThorns


Posts: 919
Joined: 6/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger

Angel.....


I usually agree with the logic in your writings, but I really think if people get to the point that they are hurting bad enough and can identify the root cause of that hurt, they will rise up and take care of the problem. It's an inherent trait in every human, they've just gotta find it within themselves.



- The Ranger


About 5 years ago, I would have agreed with this statement. Nowadays, I'm not too sure. I mean, a large portion of Iraqis could have identified Saddam as the root of their strife, yes? Why then, didn't they rise up against him? No revolution...no real resistance. I know that fear can be used effectively to control a population (ie. Terror Alert Levels), but if the suffering is so great, wouldn't the population be able to overcome that fear and do what they felt was necessary?

Our forefathers started the American Revolution over taxation without representation. Over TAXES! They weren't being executed en masse, tortured, or enduring any of the things that many of the Iraqi people endured whilest under Saddam.. what does it take to get a population to stand up and fight for itself?

Either things weren't as bad as it seemed for those living under Saddam, the use of fear was so effective as to quell all resistance, or people have just become too lazy to take an interest in their own existance.

As much as I may like the Draconian approaches offered by Merc and Ranger...and would like to add to the plan that all felons (white collar crimes included) be sent to a Turkish-pound-me-in-the-ass prison and stripped of all rights as a US citizen...I just don't think it will happen. Isolationism didn't work for China, isn't working for N Korea and won't work for the U.S. either. We are just too dependant on other countries for support.

quote:


Not to simplify the whole thing as I know it's more complicated as this but I think it's good that we haven't had anymore attacks like 9/11 since we've begun our attacks against terrorist and liberating impoverished people.


Honestly, I think this is due to logistics. Why would Al Qaeda spend all the money and effort to sneak terrorists into the U.S. to kill Americans, when there are plenty of Americans to kill in their own back yard?

I would like to see a gradual withdrawl of forces over the next 2 years. I think a small contingent, (15-25,000) needs to stay in support of the Iraqi forces as a Quick Reaction Force...based in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, or some logical place other than Iraq. We continue to train their forces over the next 2 years and then...they're on their own. All forces go on border patrol, stricter immigration laws, removal of water points in the desert, reinstatement of the term "Illegal Immigrant", (as opposed to "undocumented"), a chicken in every pot, a responsible environmnental policy, socialized health care, and a partridge in every pear tree.
Vote Thorns in '08

(I'm MrThorns and I approved this message)

~Thorns

_____________________________

~"Do you know what the chain of command is? Its the chain I beat ya with when ya don't follow my command."

"My inner child is a mean little fucker"

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 7:00:51 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
Hi Ranger...

Man - fish - rod - etc... usual analagy.

Of course there is reasonable thoughts that say that immigration doesn't help and that the vunerable should be able to fight for themselves. But when the vunerable are people who are women, minorities, children - they need support. Otherwise, they disappear and never return. Rwanda is a case in point. What happens is genocide. If it wasn't for people opening their boarders, with the ability to return - there would not be the jewish community there is today still thriving in germany because they would all be dead.
People only help when it effects them. It's natural human nature to protect ones own boarders and secure ones own environment. But you cannot seriously say you would close your door on a family who came knocking, who has been beaten, mother and daughters waiting to be raped, sons tortured, husband and bread winner murdered and hung up in the street to be made an example of. They lose their land - their rights - there privilages. Their freedom. Where would the black community be today in the USA if only the black population had fought? Why is it that the native americans have little land to what they should? Why is it that people like you and me are subjected to prison, just for holding paintings or pictures of consensual control?

It's very very easy to say 'let them eat cake' - but this isn't just issues that effect a single country, or minority - its a global issue of global importance that has everything to do with your back garden, your home and your individual freedoms.

Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 7:16:33 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrThorns


I mean, a large portion of Iraqis could have identified Saddam as the root of their strife, yes? Why then, didn't they rise up against him? No revolution...no real resistance. I know that fear can be used effectively to control a population (ie. Terror Alert Levels), but if the suffering is so great, wouldn't the population be able to overcome that fear and do what they felt was necessary?



That's not correct.

The Shiites and Kurds both rebelled against Saddam in 1991, after the first Gulf War. They were encouraged to do so by statements made by the US which led them to believe the US would support them. Of course, the US didn't support them in any significant way, and Saddam was able to crush both movements. The Kurds were eventually relatively successful in carving out some degree of autonomy from Saddam; the Shiites weren't. Both groups remained resistant to Saddam through the 90s -- that's why the Northern and Southern No-Fly Zones were imposed -- to prevent Saddam's Republican Guard and security forces from moving into those areas and slaughtering people.

There was no effective in-country political resistance in the central part of the country (Baghdad & Sunni triangle) because, well, any Sunnis who resisted politically were killed. All of the Iraqi political opposition was effectively located overseas in the Iraqi National Congress and whatever the competing group was (can't remember the acronym). INA -- Iraqi National Accord.

Link to Congressional Research Service Report on Iraq Opposition Movements

(in reply to MrThorns)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 7:28:45 AM   
MrThorns


Posts: 919
Joined: 6/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrThorns


I mean, a large portion of Iraqis could have identified Saddam as the root of their strife, yes? Why then, didn't they rise up against him? No revolution...no real resistance. I know that fear can be used effectively to control a population (ie. Terror Alert Levels), but if the suffering is so great, wouldn't the population be able to overcome that fear and do what they felt was necessary?



That's not correct.

The Shiites and Kurds both rebelled against Saddam in 1991, after the first Gulf War. They were encouraged to do so by statements made by the US which led them to believe the US would support them. Of course, the US didn't support them in any significant way, and Saddam was able to crush both movements.


Excellent point...I stand corrected.

So what about now? If we left tomorrow, I'm sure someone would try and establish a new dictatorship. With Saddam out of power, are the Iraqi people able and willing to stand up for themselves without the US against the next opressor that presents itself??

~Thorns

_____________________________

~"Do you know what the chain of command is? Its the chain I beat ya with when ya don't follow my command."

"My inner child is a mean little fucker"

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 8:18:30 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrThorns


So what about now? If we left tomorrow, I'm sure someone would try and establish a new dictatorship. With Saddam out of power, are the Iraqi people able and willing to stand up for themselves without the US against the next opressor that presents itself??

~Thorns


Is that a rhetorical question?

(in reply to MrThorns)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 10:03:04 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

They were encouraged to do so by statements made by the US which led them to believe the US would support them. Of course, the US didn't support them in any significant way, and Saddam was able to crush both movements.


Pollux,
And therein lies the primary cause of where we are today in Iraq. I think it has more to do with US "credibility" than any other. It can also be sighted as contributory to 9/11. The big difference about internal revolution in Iraq and the historical example of the US and England, is that for the most part, the sides were evenly matched regarding firepower. Of course England had the ability to put more trained manpower against the US "terrorists" in 1776, but a consequence of that act would have been jeopardizing their homeland against an invasion by France. The US "won" the revolutionary war in the same manner as the Vietnamese "won"; attrition and an attitude that "it just wasn't worth the effort" by the stronger adversary. How else can you explain the US success in the revolution against the fact that, for those keeping score, we only won one battle? (Bonus if you can identify that battle.) In Iraq, Saddam had a free hand in putting down any adversary or potential adversary without fear once he knew we weren't really going to support these revolutionary forces as he killed them in mass. I'm sure it was his rationalization for not surrendering prior to our invasion. US credibility was already low enough that until the first bombs fell there was reasonable doubt that they wouldn't.

The other point that your post raises is no less important. Like the break up of USSR, there is no one faction. The Soviet Union served a purpose of keeping all the factions in check. We expected universal peace on earth after the fall of the Soviet Union, instead we have more war based upon vendettas and issues that go back hundreds if not thousands of years. I think this factor is very contributory to the issues of leaving Iraq. There is no homogeneous environment, no common cause that would override centuries old hatred between the various factions. As of yet, I see no politician or political party who considers this issue.
quote:

Thorns: Isolationism didn't work for China, isn't working for N Korea and won't work for the U.S. either. We are just too dependent on other countries for support.

Not to hijack the thread, but US isolationism was my senior thesis in college. I am more convinced it's possible now. The difference between those countries and the US is that we aren't dependent on any other country. However, those countries sited NEED the US as a market. We don't need them. We are a market unto ourselves. This could be a very long post to flesh it out, but it is not difficult to create an economic model to prove that it could work, in conjunction with the immigration program. The drain of illegal immigration on the job market in the US along with the siphoning off of tax dollars for the associated social services is a HUGE number which would come off the top of any budget.

Hell with it, I give up - the reasons are impossible to document or address in a short paragraph or two.

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 11:59:11 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
Saratoga.

But I'm embarassed to say I had to look it up.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 1:14:55 PM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

HAR! Yup, you read me right.
In a nutshell : Think of the United States as just a larger version of Easter Island. The island has a limited amount of resources to sustain a certain level of population. The population is increasing at an exponential rate; while the resources needed to sustain the population are dwindling.

Not only should this country end legal and illegal immigration, it should also put an emphasis on depopulation. {Meaning : to encourage the current population to not to repopulate}
How very convenient for you to have come to this conclusion now that your parents and you have had your opportunity to prosper in these United States on the backs of others. We can't forget history just because it's convenient at this moment.
quote:

it should also put an emphasis on depopulation
Barbarism! Oh Yes, that is what we need to return to so we can save these United Sates. You should know that people immigrate and emigrate into and out of the US legally all the time, and that legal movement has never broken our backs. Illegal I can agree is draining the system.
quote:

bar·ba·rism Audio pronunciation of "Barbarism" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (bärb-rzm)
n.

1. An act, trait, or custom characterized by ignorance or crudity.
2.
1. The use of words, forms, or expressions considered incorrect or unacceptable.
Stop people from legally migrating as they can/will, and teach them to stop reproducing, so we can all carry one with our comforts and not have to work any harder at making it better for the next generation.

quote:

Now.... I know my logic my seem brutal, but we can't keep coddling these people! We've gotta make them stand on their two feet and fight back! And the best way to do that is, force them to remain in misery, amongst the evil, greedy and corrupt, as one day{Hopefully soon} they will get tired of it
Your logic doesn't seem brutal, it is barbaric in my opinion. I will say I don't completely disagree with everything you said. I am in agreement with completely stopping illegal immigration. Instead of guarding other countries, first guard the US.

I do agree that people should first try to help themeselves, and rather that going in and taking over a country, The US/all of the worlds countries ought to help educate and empower people sufficiently so that they understand that there is no point in living without freedom to live on their terms (I'm speaking in relative terms, and understand the US itself has a long way to go on this premise).
It is not sufficient though to say we have to protect what we have when we've had no problem taking food from the mouths of babies in the past for our benefit. We have more for many (legal and illegal) reasons, and we owe more to the world for those reasons.

I believe the US can help people who are trying to overcome an injust tyrant, like Saddam; the problem is that we usually falter when we promise to help (as in at the end of Afghanistan's war against the Soviets, and as Pollux mentioned above, at the end of Gulf War), and so we end up with enormous impossible messes on our hands. M

< Message edited by BlkTallFullfig -- 11/22/2005 1:50:59 PM >


_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 1:21:30 PM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

pollux
They were encouraged to do so by statements made by the US which led them to believe the US would support them. Of course, the US didn't support them in any significant way, and Saddam was able to crush both movements.

Mercnbeth,
And therein lies the primary cause of where we are today in Iraq. I think it has more to do with US "credibility" than any other. It can also be sighted as contributory to 9/11.
Richard Clark's book "Against All Enemies" would disagree with this part at least of your argument as it relates to 9/11 at least. M

_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Solutions? - 11/22/2005 2:56:41 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

How very convenient for you to have come to this conclusion now that your parents and you have had your opportunity to prosper in these United States on the backs of others. We can't forget history just because it's convenient at this moment.


M,
Distinguish my position from Ranger's in that I don't feel the need to close the borders to LEGAL immigration.

You know there is a distinction. Immigration was solicited in the US until shortly after WWII. People came here legally for an opportunity. There was work to be done, mostly menial, but because they were legal, they paid taxes on their income. Businesses took advantage of them in mines, factories, and sweat shops, but they eventually were able to achieve personal growth and success for themselves and their children because they were LEGAL. Their goals were goal for the United States. Proud of their history and background, but not to the point of excluding themselves from the society of their adopted country.

Every immigrant passed through checkpoints. Immigrants assimilated into society. Immigrants forced their children to assimilate into the school system without requiring or expecting costly, and counter productive bi-lingual education. I don't believe that the current immigrants and their children are any less intelligent or less capable than my grand parents were. Why should we treat them as inferior and assume they are incapable of the same assimilation?

The lower end of the income spectrum are the very people who are hurt the worst from illegal immigration. It's very apparent here in SoCal but more insidious and deeper in places like Arkansas, where large corporations like Tyson hide behind toothless paperwork verification to employ thousands in an area of deeply impoverished US citizens.

(in reply to BlkTallFullfig)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Solutions? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094