RE: Solutions? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


BlkTallFullfig -> RE: Solutions? (11/22/2005 3:05:10 PM)

quote:

M,
Distinguish my position from Ranger's in that I don't feel the need to close the borders to LEGAL immigration.
I'm in complete agreement there. I am all for more aggressive implementation of laws against illegal immigration, and controlling the borders... That however might piss off a lot of the president and his brothers supporters. M




Mercnbeth -> RE: Solutions? (11/22/2005 3:24:57 PM)

quote:

That however might piss off a lot of the president and his brothers supporters.


Nodding and ordering another round!




darkinshadows -> RE: Solutions? (11/22/2005 4:09:35 PM)

Two words
Dover Test.

This war wouldnt past that test - and the president and his cronies know it.

There are twice as many soldiers killed and maimed retrning than V/nam.
Bush has lied, restricted images, and national papers aren't posting the returns of their sons and daughters - check the papers - where are the mentions? Where are the grand returns of these brave and dead men and women?... and the great bush has not even honoured the return of His 'own men' in their caskets by attending. In fact, he tried to ban the images and photogrpahs and was taken to court over it.
Thats the kind of president that is running a democratic country.

Terrorism is a war of ideas, and you can't attack and kill an idea, you can only murder people.

Peace and Love


Edit to add quote:

quote:

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."
— President Theodore Roosevelt




michaelMI -> RE: Solutions? (11/22/2005 4:16:07 PM)

personally, i don't think the America should police the whole world. yes, i know we went there because of 9-11, but we failed in the mission and are staying longer than we really should. George Carlin had it right that America is a war-like country.




veronicaofML -> RE: Solutions? (11/22/2005 5:29:39 PM)

George Carlin had it right that America is a war-like country.
========
of course.......Carlin don't lie!




UtopianRanger -> RE: Solutions? (11/22/2005 7:43:52 PM)

quote:

How very convenient for you to have come to this conclusion now that your parents and you have had your opportunity to prosper in these United States on the backs of others. We can't forget history just because it's convenient at this moment


My position has nothing to do with the fact that me and mine have already prospered and we don't care about others. My post clearly says that I want to these people to be happy and successful, but I think they need to find it within themselves and do it within their own countries. When and if they finally do so, not only will they be better off as a people, but both the united states and the rest of the world will be better off.

You're absolutely correct about us not forgetting history, however, at the same time we need to be very mindful that we can't live in the past. This country is clearly not in the same position it was when they came through Ellis Island. Remember, our resources are in a state of decline and we need to be logical and pragmatic.

quote:


Barbarism! Oh Yes, that is what we need to return to so we can save these United Sates. You should know that people immigrate and emigrate into and out of the US legally all the time, and that legal movement has never broken our backs. Illegal I can agree is draining the system.


Barbarism? Again... I call it being logical and pragmatic. Many of the leading minds on the planet believe that overpopulation will ultimately lead to our demise. My analogy regards Easter Island is right on the money.

quote:


Stop people from legally migrating as they can/will, and teach them to stop reproducing, so we can all carry one with our comforts and not have to work any harder at making it better for the next generation.


I call it situational ethics. We need to make certain sacrifices in order to preserve the future.

quote:

Your logic doesn't seem brutal, it is barbaric in my opinion. I will say I don't completely disagree with everything you said. I am in agreement with completely stopping illegal immigration. Instead of guarding other countries, first guard the US.

I do agree that people should first try to help themselves, and rather that going in and taking over a country, The US/all of the worlds countries ought to help educate and empower people sufficiently so that they understand that there is no point in living without freedom to live on their terms (I'm speaking in relative terms, and understand the US itself has a long way to go on this premise).
It is not sufficient though to say we have to protect what we have when we've had no problem taking food from the mouths of babies in the past for our benefit. We have more for many (legal and illegal) reasons, and we owe more to the world for those reasons.

I believe the US can help people who are trying to overcome an injust tyrant, like Saddam; the problem is that we usually falter when we promise to help (as in at the end of Afghanistan's war against the Soviets, and as Pollux mentioned above, at the end of Gulf War), and so we end up with enormous impossible messes on our hands. M


Well.... I'm glad we agree on something! Yes... the illegal immigration situation is definitely the main problem.

In my opinion, we as a country would be much better off if Saddam were still in power. Iran was/is a far bigger supporter of state sponsered terrorismn. At least with Saddam, there was a somewhat balance of power. Now we have utter kaos and complete uncertainy. I think a large majority of the Iraqi people would now come to the same conclusion.

Saddam was no worse than the house of Saud in the way he ruled. And you don't see us trying to subvert that monarchy. In fact, I find him ten times more transparent and easier to control.




- The Ranger






Chaingang -> RE: Solutions? (11/22/2005 7:48:29 PM)

Commentary:

Basically, Iraq's leaders want us out, and they seem to have just endorsed Congressman Murtha's proposal for a timed withdrawal, a real beefing up of the Iraqi armed forces, and stronger protection at the borders. Even wilder, and something that's not in Murtha's proposal, Iraq's leaders now say it's not terrorism if you attack Americans. It's only terrorism if you attack Iraqi citizens or Iraqi "institutions."

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/11/iraqi-leaders-adopt-murtha-proposal.html

--------------------------------------

Source article:

The final communique, hammered out at the end of three days of negotiations at a preparatory reconciliation conference under the auspices of the Arab League, condemned terrorism, but was a clear acknowledgment of the Sunni position that insurgents should not be labeled as terrorists if their operations do not target innocent civilians or institutions designed to provide for the welfare of Iraqi citizens.
...
"Though resistance is a legitimate right for all people, terrorism does not represent resistance. Therefore, we condemn terrorism and acts of violence, killing and kidnapping targeting Iraqi citizens and humanitarian, civil, government institutions, national resources and houses of worships,'' the document said.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5431131,00.html

--------------------------------------

Open season on Americans I guess...

Gee, where's that big welcome we were promised? Have we overstayed our welcome? What gives?




sub4hire -> RE: Solutions? (11/22/2005 8:28:35 PM)

quote:

Commentary:

Basically, Iraq's leaders want us out, and they seem to have just endorsed Congressman Murtha's proposal for a timed withdrawal, a real beefing up of the Iraqi armed forces, and stronger protection at the borders. Even wilder, and something that's not in Murtha's proposal, Iraq's leaders now say it's not terrorism if you attack Americans. It's only terrorism if you attack Iraqi citizens or Iraqi "institutions."


How is this news? They have been echoing the same sentiments since we set foot on their ground.
The only difference at the moment I see is the American media is saying it out loud.




Chaingang -> RE: Solutions? (11/22/2005 10:31:28 PM)

Well, timing is everything. And since when is newsworthiness a criteria in an open discussion?

My only point is that it cannot easily be proven that the Iraqi people even want us there, and that's certainly part of what the White House wants to continue pretending. And if they don't want us there, why make the effort?

Of course, I well realize there are other largely unreported reasons as to why the U.S. is in Iraq at this moment in time.




darkinshadows -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 1:12:59 AM)

quote:

In my opinion, we as a country would be much better off if Saddam were still in power. Iran was/is a far bigger supporter of state sponsered terrorismn. At least with Saddam, there was a somewhat balance of power. Now we have utter kaos and complete uncertainy. I think a large majority of the Iraqi people would now come to the same conclusion.


And a large section of the - now - Iraqi parliment is made up from Iran zealots....
Hows that for irony?

Peace and Rapture




UtopianRanger -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 5:36:46 AM)

No doubt Angel. I think the neocons saw that one coming a long time ago and knew they screwed up.

From a secular government with one ruling tyrant, to a government filled with a bunch nutty fanatics ready to strap on a vest full of c-4 and nails and walk on a crowded bus or into shopping mall at the drop of a hat.

And while we're speaking of Iran.....I wonder how it is that a bunch of fanatics, armed with nothing more than rocks and a few small arms, were able to overthrow another tyrant like the Shaw, when they had no ability to communicate on a mass scale.

The revolution was initiated by small groups of people slowly passing out cassette tapes to the masses and spreading the word.

The people have it within them; They can either reach down deep inside and feel their hearts, or lower their eyes and forever cower in fear.


- The Ranger




sub4hire -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 7:50:44 AM)

quote:

My only point is that it cannot easily be proven that the Iraqi people even want us there, and that's certainly part of what the White House wants to continue pretending. And if they don't want us there, why make the effort?

Of course, I well realize there are other largely unreported reasons as to why the U.S. is in Iraq at this moment in time.


I agree with you. I am not one who watches a single news program and belives it. The person I am is inquisitive so I search out more.

Bottom line is as Americans in Iraq we are the terrorists. Nothing more, nothing less.
The only difference between Bin Laden and US is we stand out in the open and dare people to kill us. While he does it a bit more intelligently and hides so he can kill more people.

Will it take us out of Iraq? Doubtful, even if all of the truth came out today.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 9:09:52 AM)

quote:

The only difference between Bin Laden and US is we stand out in the open and dare people to kill us.


Pity that you aren't living and basking in the freedom of life under bin Laden, perhaps then you'd be able to appreciate the differences. Every purple finger in Iraq on it's election day is an indication of the difference. Other differences; no one in the US or Iraq expects the US to be there forever, we didn't dictate the terms of the Iraqi constitution, we didn't allow only one party or one person to run for election.

Better to be out in the open as a beacon than hidden in a "spider hole" as Saddam, or in a cave as bin Laden. Truth isn't meant to be hidden or kept a secret. It's meant to stand out in the open. Confronting the issues head on and being committed to integrity are reasons to stand in the open if you truly believe in them.

On a final note, on June 28, 2004 the sovereignty of Iraq was given by the US to the, at the time, interim Iraqi government. Should that existing government ask us to leave, we are obligated to do so, as we and other NATO forces are currently doing in Uzbekistan.




AAkasha -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 9:18:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

The only difference between Bin Laden and US is we stand out in the open and dare people to kill us.


Pity that you aren't living and basking in the freedom of life under bin Laden, perhaps then you'd be able to appreciate the differences. Every purple finger in Iraq on it's election day is an indication of the difference. Other differences; no one in the US or Iraq expects the US to be there forever, we didn't dictate the terms of the Iraqi constitution, we didn't allow only one party or one person to run for election.

Better to be out in the open as a beacon than hidden in a "spider hole" as Saddam, or in a cave as bin Laden. Truth isn't meant to be hidden or kept a secret. It's meant to stand out in the open. Confronting the issues head on and being committed to integrity are reasons to stand in the open if you truly believe in them.

On a final note, on June 28, 2004 the sovereignty of Iraq was given by the US to the, at the time, interim Iraqi government. Should that existing government ask us to leave, we are obligated to do so, as we and other NATO forces are currently doing in Uzbekistan.


I'm in no way a political buff and I stay out of this stuff. But isn't the existing gov't that could ask us to leave the gov't we personally put in place?

Akasha




sub4hire -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 9:29:35 AM)

quote:

I'm in no way a political buff and I stay out of this stuff. But isn't the existing gov't that could ask us to leave the gov't we personally put in place?


Yes, it is Aakasha.





darkinshadows -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 9:55:06 AM)

quote:

I'm in no way a political buff and I stay out of this stuff. But isn't the existing gov't that could ask us to leave the gov't we personally put in place?

Akasha


Yes Akasha. It is also as I said above, consists of Iranian supporters and ministers.


quote:

Truth isn't meant to be hidden or kept a secret. It's meant to stand out in the open. Confronting the issues head on and being committed to integrity are reasons to stand in the open if you truly believe in them.


Then why is bush and his administration trying to cover up the tragic deaths, injuries and lied through their back teeth over this war if honesty is such an important concept? The is no integrity - only lies and coverups. Terrorism is an idea - not a person.


quote:

Better to be out in the open as a beacon than hidden in a "spider hole" as Saddam, or in a cave as bin Laden.


I think you will find bush is usually on holiday, rather than out in the open.

Peace and Rapture




Mercnbeth -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 10:32:44 AM)

quote:

I'm in no way a political buff and I stay out of this stuff. But isn't the existing gov't that could ask us to leave the gov't we personally put in place?


No it was elected by the people with the purple fingers.




darkinshadows -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 12:21:04 PM)

quote:

No it was elected by the people with the purple fingers.


Who have been influenced by the government of attending 'peacekeepers'

Peace and Love




Mercnbeth -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 12:43:16 PM)

Here's a link to a article from the "World Socialist Web Site". I don't think they are regarded by anyone as "pro-American", who would use the election results to prove how much the Iraqi hate America. Regardless of their agenda skewed opinion, they report 58% of the people voted. Considering that the percentage is comparable to US National elections and far exceeds the US "off year" election percentages I say the percentage is quite high. In very few areas of the US do you run the risk of encountering a suicide bomber.

Based upon the article the results were not pro-American. It would seem to indicate that armed US solders only guarded the polling places and didn't make them vote pro-American.

It doesn't appear that the "influence" influenced the voting or the results.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/feb2005/iraq-f16.shtml

Of course there are other reports which show the US slanted "success" of the elections, but I thought you'd be more comfortable and give more credibility to a source with information reporting the failure of American influence. In Saddam's time he won 99% of the votes and the other 1% were hunted down and killed. I find the access to options an improvement, even if they reportedly don't support my side of the argument.




darkinshadows -> RE: Solutions? (11/23/2005 2:34:21 PM)

For every link You could pull up from a alledgedly 'reputable' source - I could double it. In turn, You could double me... the list would go onwards.

I prefere to focus on the facts as I see them.
Bush Lied.
America is not as efficiant as its government would like the world to believe.
Not all muslims follow Bin Laden.
The majority of Islamic people are peace loving.
Blair lied
Bush does not have His troops best interests foremost in His thoughts.
Bush has and also wanted to attack non millitary instilations.
The council now holding control in Iraq has Iran input.
Bin Laden is still free.
Saddam was a scapegoat.
Mugabe is still allowed to commit atrocities.
The whole Israel/Palestine mess is not helped by US interference and support of the Israelies and pretty much blocked any UN resolution(and no matter what people think about the UN, blocking such is still not good) against them.(Selfish interests)
American governments ignorance concerning Global warming is intolerable.
Americas human rights atrocities are not to be ignored.

Do not get me wrong. I love america. I just do not love the lies that are perpetuated in the name of so called 'democracy'... in the name of 'freedom'. Lets just be honest here - freedom for whom?

Peace and Love




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875