candystripper -> RE: Background Check (3/3/2006 3:53:00 PM)
|
quote:
So here's the bottom line, candy. You're no ones mommy here so why don't you just post on things either directed to you or are just general statements and not single out mine that were made back to someone that posted directly to me. Got it, love? MrDiscipline i apologise if i inadvertently "bumped" this thread. i used "Most Active Thread" as a search today for the first time, perhaps that is why. However, i do not feel my replies were directed solely to You, nor one-sided. i feel simply that captianspet should get background checks on any Man she intends to become involved with, at a a proper time, with proper protection for Him against identity theft. i feel this precaution is a poor cousin to intuition and just plain old listening, but neverthelesss, with as much at stake as happens when a couple decides one will relocate or they will cohabitate or both, anything that reduces risk is not untoward. i realise that You, and SirKenin, and Lam, and Focus, and others have taken the position that checks are bad and should never be done. i find that extreme, but i also said "reasonable people can disagree". i find all of You to be reaasonable people, and on this, we disagree. Remember, i feel Doms should get checks on submissives as well. candystripper
|
|
|
|